Installs into .claude/skills of the current project.
Are you the author of Accessibility Compliance?
Add the live security badge to your README. It updates with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/bromso-accessibility-compliance)
---
description: Assess legal accessibility requirements — ADA, EAA, WCAG legal obligations
---
# Accessibility Compliance
Assess legal accessibility requirements for "$ARGUMENTS". Identify applicable accessibility laws, determine WCAG conformance requirements, assess current compliance, and create a remediation plan.
> **Note:** AI-generated legal content does not constitute legal advice. Consult a qualified attorney.
## Prerequisites
Check that `.metapowers/legal/$ARGUMENTS/00-assess.md` exists. If it does not exist, stop and tell the user:
> "Run an Assess skill first (e.g. `/legal:risk-assessment $ARGUMENTS`) to generate the prerequisite assessment artifact."
If the user passes `--skip-checks`, bypass this check and log the skip to `.metapowers/legal/$ARGUMENTS/skip-log.md` with a timestamp and the reason "Prerequisite check skipped for accessibility-compliance".
## Process
1. **Read inputs:**
- Read `.metapowers/legal/$ARGUMENTS/00-assess.md` for risk, jurisdiction, and data practice context
- Read any existing accessibility audit or review artifacts in `.metapowers/legal/$ARGUMENTS/` for additional context
2. **Identify applicable accessibility laws by jurisdiction:**
- **United States:**
- ADA Title III — public accommodations, DOJ web accessibility guidance, case law trends
- Section 508 (Rehabilitation Act) — federal agencies and recipients of federal funding
- State laws (California Unruh Act, New York accessibility requirements, etc.)
- **European Union:**
- European Accessibility Act (EAA) — effective June 2025, products and services requirements
- Web Accessibility Directive — public sector websites and mobile apps
- EN 301 549 standard
- **United Kingdom:**
- Equality Act 2010 — reasonable adjustments obligation
- Public Sector Bodies Accessibility Regulations 2018
- **Canada:**
- Accessibility for Ontarians with Disabilities Act (AODA) — WCAG 2.0 AA for Ontario
- Accessible Canada Act (ACA) — federal regulated organizations
- **Other applicable jurisdictions** — document requirements based on assessment context
3. **Determine required WCAG conformance level:**
- Identify which WCAG version applies (2.0, 2.1, 2.2) per jurisdiction
- Typically Level AA is required by most regulations
- Document any Level AAA requirements (rare but some jurisdictions or sectors)
- Map WCAG success criteria to applicable legal requirements
4. **Assess current compliance status:**
- Reference existing accessibility audit if available
- Identify critical barriers by WCAG principle (Perceivable, Operable, Understandable, Robust)
- Document automated scan results and manual testing findings
- Catalog assistive technology compatibility (screen readers, keyboard navigation, voice control)
5. **Identify legal exposure:**
- DOJ enforcement actions and guidance relevant to the business
- Private litigation trends (ADA demand letters, structured negotiation)
- EU fines and enforcement mechanisms under EAA and Web Accessibility Directive
- Industry-specific enforcement (financial services, healthcare, education, government)
- Insurance coverage considerations
6. **Create remediation priority list:**
- **Critical barriers** (P1) — complete blockers preventing access (no keyboard access, missing alt text on critical images, inaccessible forms, no captions on essential video)
- **Major barriers** (P2) — significant difficulty using features (poor contrast, missing form labels, inconsistent navigation)
- **Minor barriers** (P3) — usability issues that don't block access (focus order anomalies, decorative image alt text, minor contrast issues)
- Timeline and resource estimates for each priority level
7. **Draft accessibility statement:**
- Commitment to accessibility and inclusion
- Standards targeted (WCAG version and level)
- Current conformance status
- Known limitations and planned remediation timeline
- Contact information for accommodation requests and feedback
- Date of last review and update
- Enforcement procedure references (where required by law)
8. **Design ongoing monitoring plan:**
- Automated scanning cadence (recommended: weekly or with each deployment)
- Manual testing schedule (recommended: quarterly)
- User testing with people with disabilities (recommended: annually or with major changes)
- Remediation tracking and reporting
- Training program for development and content teams
- Procurement requirements for third-party tools and content
9. **Write the artifact** to `.metapowers/legal/$ARGUMENTS/03-comply.md` with frontmatter:
```
---
description: Accessibility compliance assessment for $ARGUMENTS
---
```
Include sections:
- **Applicable Laws** — jurisdiction-by-jurisdiction legal requirements
- **WCAG Conformance Requirements** — version, level, and success criteria mapping
- **Current Compliance Status** — assessment findings and barrier inventory
- **Legal Exposure Analysis** — enforcement risk and litigation trends
- **Remediation Priority List** — prioritized barriers with timelines
- **Accessibility Statement** — draft statement for publication
- **Ongoing Monitoring Plan** — testing cadence and responsibilities
- **Compliance Gaps** — identified gaps with remediation recommendations
## Output
The accessibility compliance assessment written to `.metapowers/legal/$ARGUMENTS/03-comply.md`. Present a summary to the user highlighting:
- Applicable accessibility laws and required WCAG level
- Current compliance status (if audit data available)
- Number of barriers identified by priority level
- Key legal exposure areas
- Top remediation priorities and estimated timeline