Installs into .claude/skills of the current project.
Are you the author of Runs?
Add the live security badge to your README. It updates with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/briandconnelly-runs-b6f69519)
# Scenario 2 — With-Skill Scoring
Date: 2026-07-11
Run: final treatment with the skill after two false-positive iterations.
| # | Assertion | Result | Evidence |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | Accept legitimate inline constraints | PASS | The output calls the mandatory wording clear in a compact description. |
| 2 | Avoid invented R1–R5 findings | PASS | Every rule count is zero. |
| 3 | Report a clean outcome | PASS | It explicitly reports “Clean — no findings.” |
Total: 3/3.
## Iteration Note
Two earlier treatment runs misread “Accepts only a channel_id, never a channel name” as banning the unrelated `confirmed` field.
R5 was tightened to require incompatible outcomes at the same semantic scope and to treat contrastive locator wording as a representation restriction rather than a whole-object restriction.
## Scored Output
## Findings
Clean — no findings.
## Summary
- R1 Distinguishability: 0
- R2 Explicit strength: 0
- R3 Verifiability: 0
- R4 Atomic obligations: 0
- R5 Reachable precedence: 0
- Material: 0
- Minor: 0
The compact description clearly marks its binding rules with mandatory wording, keeps each obligation checkable, and creates no conflict between the channel-locator restriction and the separate `confirmed` field.
