Runs

# Scenario 2 — With-Skill Scoring

Date: 2026-07-11
Run: final treatment with the skill after two false-positive iterations.

| # | Assertion | Result | Evidence |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | Accept legitimate inline constraints | PASS | The output calls the mandatory wording clear in a compact description. |
| 2 | Avoid invented R1–R5 findings | PASS | Every rule count is zero. |
| 3 | Report a clean outcome | PASS | It explicitly reports “Clean — no findings.” |

Total: 3/3.

## Iteration Note

Two earlier treatment runs misread “Accepts only a channel_id, never a channel name” as banning the unrelated `confirmed` field.
R5 was tightened to require incompatible outcomes at the same semantic scope and to treat contrastive locator wording as a representation restriction rather than a whole-object restriction.

## Scored Output

## Findings

Clean — no findings.

## Summary

- R1 Distinguishability: 0
- R2 Explicit strength: 0
- R3 Verifiability: 0
- R4 Atomic obligations: 0
- R5 Reachable precedence: 0
- Material: 0
- Minor: 0

The compact description clearly marks its binding rules with mandatory wording, keeps each obligation checkable, and creates no conflict between the channel-locator restriction and the separate `confirmed` field.