Extend `/ll:align-issues` to support aligning issues against a specific skill (e.g., `/ll:align-issues skill capture-issue`). Currently the command aligns issues against key documents in configured categories. This feature adds a parallel path that uses a skill's `SKILL.md` as the alignment reference, so users can check whether an issue is well-scoped for a particular skill to implement.
Pro scans all 21 files and shows the line behind each finding
Scanned 10/6/2026
npx -y skills add BrennonTWilliams/little-loops --skill features --agent claude-codeInstalls into .claude/skills of the current project.
Are you the author of Features?
Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/brennontwilliams-features-936fd649)More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page. Keep it an A: scan every change in CI with Pro.
---
discovered_commit: ce1f6277bf5cf527716a37cb7d0bb8a3bc22a638
discovered_branch: main
discovered_date: 2026-03-04T17:00:33Z
discovered_by: capture-issue
confidence_score: 95
outcome_confidence: 75
status: done
completed_at: 2026-03-21T00:00:00Z
priority: P3
---
# FEAT-565: Add skill-based alignment option to `align-issues`
## Summary
Extend `/ll:align-issues` to support aligning issues against a specific skill (e.g., `/ll:align-issues skill capture-issue`). Currently the command aligns issues against key documents in configured categories. This feature adds a parallel path that uses a skill's `SKILL.md` as the alignment reference, so users can check whether an issue is well-scoped for a particular skill to implement.
## Current Behavior
`/ll:align-issues` only aligns issues against key document categories (e.g., `architecture`, `product`, `roadmap`). There is no way to align an issue against a specific skill's documented scope, interface, or behavior. Users who want to verify an issue is correctly described for a particular skill must manually inspect the skill's `SKILL.md` alongside the issue file.
## Motivation
Users sometimes want to verify that an issue is correctly described relative to what a specific skill is capable of — for example, checking that a `capture-issue` issue accurately references the skill's input handling, duplicate detection logic, or template behavior. Key documents cover architecture and specs, but skills represent executable capability; aligning issues to skills gives a tighter feedback loop for issue-to-implementation readiness.
## Use Case
A user has an issue that will be implemented via `/ll:manage-issue` using a specific skill. Before scheduling it, they run:
```
/ll:align-issues skill capture-issue P3-FEAT-565-align-issues-to-specific-skill.md
```
The command loads `skills/capture-issue/SKILL.md`, extracts the skill's purpose, phases, inputs, and outputs, then evaluates whether the issue accurately describes work the skill can perform.
## Expected Behavior
- **New invocation form**: `/ll:align-issues skill <skill-name> [issue-id-or-glob]`
- The command resolves `skills/<skill-name>/SKILL.md` (or `commands/<skill-name>.md` as a fallback)
- Alignment checks evaluate:
- Does the issue describe work within the skill's documented scope?
- Are inputs/outputs referenced in the issue consistent with the skill's interface?
- Are any issue steps or acceptance criteria contradicted by the skill's documented behavior?
- Output follows the same format as document-based alignment (aligned / partially aligned / misaligned + rationale)
## Implementation Steps
1. Parse the new `skill` subcommand in the align-issues command entrypoint (`commands/align-issues.md`)
2. Resolve skill path: check `skills/<name>/SKILL.md`, fallback to `commands/<name>.md`
3. Extract relevant sections from `SKILL.md` (summary, phases, inputs, outputs, examples)
4. Reuse or adapt existing document-based alignment scoring logic with skill content as the reference
5. Emit alignment report in the existing format
## API/Interface
```
/ll:align-issues skill <skill-name> # align all active issues
/ll:align-issues skill <skill-name> <issue-id> # align specific issue
```
The `skill` subcommand is mutually exclusive with category-based alignment (e.g., `architecture`, `product`).
## Acceptance Criteria
- [ ] `skill <name>` subcommand is documented in the command's help/examples
- [ ] Skill file is resolved correctly; error surfaced if skill does not exist
- [ ] Alignment report matches format of existing document-based alignment output
- [ ] Works for both individual issues and batch (all active issues)
- [ ] Fallback to `commands/<name>.md` when `skills/<name>/SKILL.md` is absent
## Integration Map
- **Modified**: `commands/align-issues.md` — add `skill <skill-name>` subcommand parsing and resolution logic
- **Reads**: `skills/<name>/SKILL.md` or `commands/<name>.md` (fallback) as alignment reference document
- **Reused**: existing document-based alignment scoring logic in `align-issues.md`
## Impact
- **Priority**: P3 - Useful quality-of-life improvement for issue readiness workflows; does not block other work
- **Effort**: Small - Extends existing `align-issues` command with a new `skill` subcommand; reuses existing document-based alignment scoring logic
- **Risk**: Low - Additive change with no modifications to existing alignment paths; existing behavior unchanged
- **Breaking Change**: No
## Labels
`feature`, `align-issues`, `captured`
## Status
**Won't Do** | Created: 2026-03-04 | Closed: 2026-03-21 | Priority: P3
## Blocked By
## Blocks
- ENH-493
- ENH-494
## Verification Notes
- **2026-03-05** — VALID. `commands/align-issues.md` exists; no `skill` subcommand present. `skills/*/SKILL.md` files exist and are resolvable at the paths described.
## Session Log
- `/ll:capture-issue` - 2026-03-04T17:00:33Z - `~/.claude/projects/-Users-brennon-AIProjects-brenentech-little-loops/`
- `/ll:format-issue` - 2026-03-04T00:00:00Z - `~/.claude/projects/-Users-brennon-AIProjects-brenentech-little-loops/6acf223f-9180-496e-98d5-4870ad746dc8.jsonl`
- `/ll:verify-issues` - 2026-03-05T00:00:00Z - `~/.claude/projects/-Users-brennon-AIProjects-brenentech-little-loops/6acf223f-9180-496e-98d5-4870ad746dc8.jsonl`
- `/ll:confidence-check` - 2026-03-05T00:00:00Z - `~/.claude/projects/-Users-brennon-AIProjects-brenentech-little-loops/6acf223f-9180-496e-98d5-4870ad746dc8.jsonl`
- `/ll:map-dependencies` - 2026-03-05T00:00:00Z - `~/.claude/projects/-Users-brennon-AIProjects-brenentech-little-loops/`
- `/ll:verify-issues` - 2026-03-05T00:00:00Z - `~/.claude/projects/-Users-brennon-AIProjects-brenentech-little-loops/7e4136f8-62b5-4ca5-a35a-929d4c59fd71.jsonl`
- `/ll:verify-issues` - 2026-03-06T00:00:00Z - `~/.claude/projects/-Users-brennon-AIProjects-brenentech-little-loops/f8de0c26-1ae9-4a68-b489-a58a6458da2f.jsonl` — VALID: no skill subcommand in align-issues
- `/ll:verify-issues` - 2026-03-07T00:00:00Z - `~/.claude/projects/-Users-brennon-AIProjects-brenentech-little-loops/cb0f358f-581f-41c1-aedf-c51ecbc7de35.jsonl` — VALID: `commands/align-issues.md` still has no `skill` subcommand
- `/ll:format-issue` - 2026-03-13T01:15:27Z - `f103ccc2-c870-4de7-a6e4-0320db6d9313.jsonl`
Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!