Create a PR to the main branch for feature/fix changes in this pnpm + Changesets monorepo. Use when the user says "PRを作成", "mainにPR", or wants to submit changes for review. Always run this in the monorepo-aware way — identify the affected package(s) and make sure a changeset exists, because the release pipeline is Changesets-driven.
Scanned 9/5/2026
Install to Claude Code
npx -y skills add breaking-brake/cc-wf-studio --skill pr-to-main --agent claude-codeInstalls into .claude/skills of the current project.
Are you the author of Pr To Main?
Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/breaking-brake-pr-to-main)More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page.
---
name: pr-to-main
description: Create a PR to the main branch for feature/fix changes in this pnpm + Changesets monorepo. Use when the user says "PRを作成", "mainにPR", or wants to submit changes for review. Always run this in the monorepo-aware way — identify the affected package(s) and make sure a changeset exists, because the release pipeline is Changesets-driven.
---
# PR to Main Branch
Create a PR for a feature/fix branch targeting `main` in the cc-wf-studio monorepo.
This is a **pnpm monorepo with four packages** (`packages/core`, `packages/mcp`, `packages/cli`, `packages/vscode`) and versioning is driven by **Changesets**, not commit messages. Two monorepo facts shape this workflow:
- A release-worthy change must ship with a `.changeset/*.md` file in the same PR. Without it, the change merges but **never gets released** — and pending changesets later block promotion to production.
- Knowing *which package(s)* changed drives the changeset target, the PR scope, and the commit scope (e.g. `fix(vscode):`).
So the job here is not just "open a PR" — it's "open a PR that the release pipeline can actually act on."
## Workflow
1. **Gather context** (run in parallel):
- `git status` (no `-uall`)
- `git diff` (staged + unstaged) and `git diff origin/main...HEAD` for the full branch delta
- `git log origin/main..HEAD --oneline` for every commit on the branch
- Check whether the branch tracks a remote and needs pushing
- `ls .changeset/*.md` to see whether a changeset already exists
2. **Identify scope and type**:
- **Affected package(s)**: map changed paths to packages — `packages/core` → `@cc-wf-studio/core`, `packages/mcp` → `@cc-wf-studio/mcp`, `packages/cli` → `@cc-wf-studio/cli`, `packages/vscode` → `cc-wf-studio` (the VSCode extension). Changes outside `packages/` (root config, `.github/`, docs) usually need no release.
- **Type**: read the commit prefix, allowing an optional scope — `fix:` / `fix(vscode):` → fix, `feat:` / `feat(core):` → feat, `improvement:` → improvement. Review **all** commits on the branch, not just the latest.
3. **Ensure a changeset exists** (the monorepo-critical step):
- If a `.changeset/*.md` already covers this change, confirm it names the right package(s) and bump level, and move on.
- If the change should be released and no changeset exists, create one with `pnpm changeset` — select the affected package(s) from step 2, choose patch/minor/major, and write a one-line summary (this becomes the CHANGELOG entry). Note: bumping `@cc-wf-studio/core` auto-bumps its dependents, so you don't author separate changesets for `cli`/`mcp`.
- If the change genuinely needs no release (CI-only, tooling, docs), record that intent explicitly with `pnpm changeset add --empty` so the pipeline isn't left guessing.
- Why this matters: releases are cut later by manually opening the Release PR (which consumes the accumulated changesets) and merging it — that merge auto-publishes. A PR that lands without the right changeset silently never gets released. (See `docs/release-flow.md` for the release side — releasing is a human-only action, not something to self-trigger.)
4. **Verify the build is green** before opening the PR:
- Run `pnpm check && pnpm build` from the repo root (Biome + type-checks, then full compilation). Reviewers and CI expect a clean tree, and catching breakage now is cheaper than after review.
5. **Select the PR template** based on type (from step 2):
- `fix:` → `assets/fix-template.md`
- `feat:` → `assets/feat-template.md`
- `improvement:` → `assets/improvement-template.md`
6. **Create the PR**:
- Push the branch with `git push -u` if it has no upstream.
- Open it with `gh pr create --base main`, filling the chosen template.
## PR Format
- **Language**: always write the PR title and body in English (repo rule).
- **Title** — `main` merges via **squash**, so the PR title *becomes* the squash commit subject. It must therefore follow the commit convention: `<type>(<scope>): <description>`.
- `<type>`: matches the change type from step 2 — `fix` / `feat` / `improvement` / `docs` / `refactor` / `chore` / `ci`.
- `<scope>`: the affected package/area from step 2 — `vscode`, `cli`, `mcp`, `core` (use the directory name, not the npm name). List several as `(cli, mcp)`. **Omit the scope** for repo-wide changes (root config, `.github/`, top-level docs), e.g. `ci: guard against pending changesets`.
- `<description>`: imperative mood, no trailing period, concise (aim ≤50 chars per the commit guideline; GitHub appends a `(#NN)` suffix, with a leading space, on squash — so don't pad it).
- Examples (from this repo's history): `fix(vscode): parse Changesets-format CHANGELOG`, `feat(cli): ccwf install-skills subcommand`, `docs: add root README for the monorepo`.
- **Body**: in the **Changes** section, write real monorepo paths (`packages/vscode/src/...`, `packages/core/...`), not generic placeholders.
- Mention the changeset in the body so reviewers can see the intended release effect — e.g. "Adds a `patch` changeset for `cc-wf-studio`" or "No release needed (empty changeset)".
## Templates
- **fix:** `assets/fix-template.md` — Problem/Solution with Current vs Expected behavior.
- **feat:** `assets/feat-template.md` — Summary/Motivation/Changes.
- **improvement:** `assets/improvement-template.md` — Before/After comparison.
Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!