Skip to content
Back to skills

Codex First

BSecurity

Route implementation work-orders to GPT-5.6 lanes via Codex; Claude specs, orchestrates, reviews, verifies. Use when a task is a frozen-spec build, mechanical migration, test fill, bulk sweep, or CI fix — anything that reads as a work order rather than a design problem.

  • 47 stars
  • 0 votes
  • 0 copies
  • 1 view
  • Added September 3, 2026
ai-agentsgobashsqlgit

Works with

  • claude code
  • mcp

Security analysis

B85/100
  • highPerforms destructive filesystem operations

Pro shows the line behind each finding and how to fix it

Scanned September 20, 2026

npx -y skills add boringmarketer/kimi-first --skill codex-first --agent claude-code

Installs into .claude/skills of the current project.

Are you the author of Codex First?

Add the live security badge to your README. It updates with every re-scan.

Security grade badge for Codex First
[![Security: B — Skills Directory](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/api/skills/boringmarketer-codex-first/badge)](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/boringmarketer-codex-first)

More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page. Keep it an A: scan every change in CI with Pro.

Download with Pro
SKILL.md
---
name: codex-first
description: "Route implementation work-orders to GPT-5.6 lanes via Codex; Claude specs, orchestrates, reviews, verifies. Use when a task is a frozen-spec build, mechanical migration, test fill, bulk sweep, or CI fix — anything that reads as a work order rather than a design problem."
---

# Codex First

Claude Code sessions only. Rationale: GPT-5.6 lanes run flat-rate on the ChatGPT plan and
top the coding index; Fable's edge is judgment, specs, orchestration, review. Codex types,
Claude thinks and verifies. (Adapted from steipete/agent-scripts for James's rig.)

## Route

**Delegate to Codex** (default for hands-on volume):
- implementation from a frozen spec; refactors; mechanical migrations/sweeps
- bug fixes with a known repro; test writing; coverage fills
- CI fixes, dependency bumps, scripts/tooling
- bulk exploration where raw reading ≫ the answer

**Keep in Claude (never delegate):**
- design, architecture, naming, product judgment — tasks where writing the spec IS the work
- tiny edits (<~20 lines, single obvious change) — delegation overhead loses
- anything needing session tools: MCP, browser, PostHog, memory
- **prod operations, always**: prod DB (psql), Railway env/deploys, Stripe, DNS, customer
  emails, anything reading `.env`/secrets. Codex never touches prod credentials or runs
  with them in reach.
- destructive/irreversible ops, releases, pushes, merges — Claude-side per repo protocol
- review of Codex output — never delegated, never skipped

Heuristic: prompt reads as a work order → delegate; writing it forces decisions → design,
keep it. Mixed task: Claude designs, freezes spec, delegates build-out.

## Model/effort routing (updated Aug 26 — James's strategic-loop topology)

- IMPLEMENTATION lanes: `gpt-5.6-terra`, effort **ultra** — big, BOLD, atomic
  work orders (whole migrations, whole screens, whole adapters). Clear frozen
  spec in, commits out. Claude reviews at the seams, not over the shoulder.
- REVIEWER / THINKING PARTNER: `gpt-5.6-sol`, effort high→max→ultra —
  adversarial passes, certification reads, design attacks, strategy
  pressure-tests. Sol is no longer escalation-only; it is the standing
  second brain in loops (build: terra → attack: sol → synthesize: Claude).
- Routine/cheap orders: `gpt-5.6-luna`, effort high. When the 5.6 weekly limit is out, `gpt-5.3-codex-spark` runs on a SEPARATE quota — use it for routine/mechanical lanes only; judgment and class-1 review stay on Claude seats.
- Opus 5 subagents (via Claude's Agent tool): completeness reads, design
  rulings, funnel/product craft — the divergent-thinking seat in loops.
- NAMED SEATS (Sep 1, `~/.claude/agents/`, load at session start): `designer`
  (Opus xhigh, gating design verdict), `completeness-reader` (Opus xhigh,
  scope/journey/doc-truth + overengineering strip list, before any merge or
  "live" claim), `explorer` (Sonnet low, read-only sweeps — file dumps never
  enter Fable's context), `verifier` (Sonnet xhigh, browser/MCP/walkthrough
  films with evidence, never verdicts). Fable keeps: WO authoring, prod ops,
  merges, final gate. Hands-on reading in the Fable seat is the priciest seat
  doing the cheapest work — delegate it. Skip Haiku (200K, a generation back).
- Escalate effort on failure; choose SEAT by role (terra builds, sol
  attacks, opus designs, Claude gates + synthesizes + ships).
- Every lane must COMMIT its work (atomic commits per tripwire/feature);
  Claude verifies commits exist + runs the repo's own proof set before any
  merge (for TS repos typically: lint, typecheck, unit tests, build, plus
  any disposable-infra verifier the repo carries).

## Invoke

Prompt via temp file in the scratchpad, never inline quoting:

```bash
P=$(mktemp "$SCRATCHPAD/codex-XXXXXX"); cat >"$P" <<'EOF'
<goal · repo + key paths · constraints ("don't touch X") · non-goals ·
 proof expected (exact test command) · output shape ("report files changed + test output")>
EOF
codex exec --yolo -C <repo> \
  -c model="gpt-5.6-terra" -c model_reasoning_effort="ultra" \
  -o "$SCRATCHPAD/codex-last.md" - <"$P" 2>/dev/null
```

- run long jobs with Bash `run_in_background`; read the `-o` file on completion
- `--yolo` only when the working dir is a repo without prod secrets in reach; otherwise
  default sandbox and review the command requests
- follow-ups: `codex exec resume --last` from the repo dir (cheaper, keeps context)
- parallel independent orders OK: separate worktrees/dirs, separate `-o` files
- PRUNE worktrees after each lane lands: `rm -rf /private/tmp/<repo>-*` + `git worktree prune`
  (Jul 30 incident: 219 accumulated worktrees filled the disk to 0 bytes mid-review)
- alternatively spawn the `codex:codex-rescue` subagent (plugin) for shared-runtime jobs

## Prompt contract

Codex starts with ZERO session context. Every prompt: goal, exact repo/paths, constraints,
non-goals, proof expected, output shape. Spec quality decides success.

## Verify (Claude, always)

- `git status -sb` + read the FULL diff; judge like a hostile contributor-PR review
- run the focused tests yourself or demand proof output; Codex claims are advisory
- iterate via resume; after 2 failed rounds, take over and do it directly
- ship through normal repo protocol (commit/create-pr skills, CI watch) — Claude's hands
  on the merge button, never Codex's
- substantive results feed [[adversarial-review]] before merge

Attribution

Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.

Comments

Loading comments…

Newsletter

Get the weekly list of safe new skills, and the ones we pulled.