Installs into .claude/skills of the current project.
Are you the author of Brand Strategist?
Add the live security badge to your README. It updates with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/borghei-brand-strategist)
---
name: brand-strategist
description: >
Brand strategy covering positioning, identity, brand architecture, messaging
frameworks, and governance. Use when developing brand positioning, creating
messaging frameworks, auditing brand health, or building brand architecture.
license: MIT + Commons Clause
metadata:
version: 1.0.0
author: borghei
category: marketing-growth
updated: 2026-03-31
tags: [brand, strategy, positioning, identity, messaging]
---
# Brand Strategist
The agent operates as a senior brand strategist, delivering actionable brand positioning, identity systems, messaging frameworks, and governance structures for market differentiation.
## Clarify First
Before developing the strategy, confirm these inputs. If any is unknown or vague, ASK — do not assume:
- [ ] **Target audience** — who the brand is for, in their own words (drives the "For [target]" line of the positioning statement)
- [ ] **Category frame + key benefit** — what space you compete in and the core value you deliver (drives positioning + messaging pillars)
- [ ] **Competitive set** — the named rivals to differentiate from (drives the "only-we" test and positioning map)
- [ ] **Business objective** — launch, rebrand, extension, or audit (sets scope and which deliverables matter most)
Stop rule: ask only the 2-3 that most change the output. If the user says "just draft it," proceed and list your assumptions at the top of the artifact.
## Workflow
1. **Assess brand context** - Identify the brand's category, competitive landscape, and target audience. Validate that a clear business objective exists (launch, rebrand, extension, or audit).
2. **Develop positioning** - Apply the positioning framework to define target, category frame, key benefit, and proof points. Checkpoint: the positioning statement must pass the "only-we" test (no competitor could make the same claim).
3. **Build identity system** - Define visual identity (logo, color, typography), verbal identity (voice, tone, messaging), and experiential identity. Checkpoint: every element must trace back to the positioning.
4. **Construct messaging architecture** - Create master narrative, pillar messages, and audience-specific variants. Checkpoint: each pillar must have at least two proof points.
5. **Select brand architecture model** - Choose Branded House, House of Brands, Endorsed, or Hybrid. Validate alignment with corporate strategy.
6. **Establish governance** - Define brand guidelines structure, approval process, and measurement cadence. Checkpoint: brand health dashboard covers awareness, perception, and consideration.
7. **Measure and iterate** - Set up brand tracking (NPS, unaided awareness, share of voice). Review quarterly against baselines.
## Brand Positioning Framework
### Positioning Statement Template
```
For [target audience]
Who [need or opportunity]
[Brand] is the [category]
That [key benefit]
Unlike [competitors]
We [unique differentiator]
```
### Positioning Map
```
High Price
|
PREMIUM ----+---- LUXURY
* Quality | * Status
* Performance | * Exclusivity
|
Low Innovation -----+----- High Innovation
|
VALUE ----+---- DISRUPTOR
* Accessibility | * New approach
* Affordability | * Category change
|
Low Price
```
### Competitive Positioning Matrix
| Attribute | Us | Comp A | Comp B | Comp C |
|-----------|-----|--------|--------|--------|
| Price | $$$ | $$ | $$$$ | $ |
| Quality | High | Medium | High | Low |
| Innovation | High | Low | Medium | High |
| Service | High | High | Low | Medium |
## Brand Identity System
```
BRAND IDENTITY SYSTEM
+-- Visual Identity
| +-- Logo (primary, secondary, icon)
| +-- Color palette
| +-- Typography
| +-- Imagery style
| +-- Graphic elements
+-- Verbal Identity
| +-- Brand voice
| +-- Tone guidelines
| +-- Messaging framework
| +-- Vocabulary
+-- Experiential Identity
+-- Customer experience
+-- Physical environments
+-- Digital experiences
```
### Voice Framework
| Context | Tone Adjustment |
|---------|-----------------|
| Marketing | More enthusiastic |
| Support | More empathetic |
| Legal | More formal |
| Social | More casual |
## Brand Architecture Models
| Model | Structure | Example |
|-------|-----------|---------|
| Branded House | Master Brand > Products | Google (Maps, Drive, Cloud) |
| House of Brands | Parent > Independent Brands | P&G (Tide, Pampers, Gillette) |
| Endorsed | Sub-brand by Master Brand | Marriott (Courtyard by Marriott) |
| Hybrid | Mix of above | Amazon (Prime, AWS, Whole Foods) |
## Example: Brand Positioning for a SaaS Startup
```markdown
# Brand Strategy: FlowMetrics
## Positioning Statement
For data-driven product managers
Who need real-time user behavior insights without engineering support
FlowMetrics is the self-serve analytics platform
That delivers actionable funnels in under 5 minutes
Unlike Amplitude and Mixpanel
We require zero SQL and zero instrumentation code
## Brand Values
1. Clarity: Complex data, simple answers
2. Speed: Insights in minutes, not days
3. Autonomy: No engineering dependency
## Brand Voice
- Confident but not arrogant
- Technical but accessible
- Direct and concise
## Proof Points
- 90-second median time-to-first-insight
- 4.8/5 satisfaction from non-technical PMs
- 50% reduction in analytics engineering tickets
```
## Brand Health Measurement
**Awareness:** unaided awareness, aided awareness, top-of-mind awareness
**Perception:** brand attribute association, NPS, brand sentiment
**Consideration:** purchase intent, preference vs. competitors, recommendation likelihood
```
Brand Health Dashboard - Q1 2026
Awareness: 68% (+5%) NPS: 45 (+8) Consideration: 72% (+3%)
Brand Attributes (% association)
Innovative: 78% Trustworthy: 82% Quality: 75%
Share of Voice: 32% (+2%) Sentiment: 85% positive
```
---
## Troubleshooting
| Symptom | Likely Cause | Resolution |
|---------|-------------|------------|
| Positioning statement passes internally but customers do not repeat it | Positioning built on company perspective, not customer language | Rerun April Dunford methodology with 10+ customer interviews; use verbatim customer phrases |
| Brand architecture confusion after acquisition | No decision framework for integrating acquired brands | Evaluate using brand_architecture_analyzer.py; score audience overlap and category fit to choose model |
| NPS declining despite product improvements | Brand perception lagging behind product reality | Run brand health dashboard; invest in rebranding or brand awareness campaign targeting perception gap |
| Multiple sub-brands competing for same audience | House of Brands model applied when Branded House was appropriate | Consolidate overlapping brands; use brand architecture analyzer to validate optimal model |
| Competitive positioning feels generic | Differentiators are category requirements, not unique advantages | Apply "only-we" test: if a competitor could make the same claim, it is not a differentiator |
---
## Success Criteria
- Positioning statement passes the "only-we" test — no competitor could make the same claim
- 7+ out of 10 customers describe brand value unprompted in interviews
- Brand health index scores 65+/100 across awareness, perception, consideration, and loyalty
- Brand architecture model validated by lowest churn and fastest close among A-fit segments
- Share of voice increases 5+ percentage points within two quarters of brand strategy execution
- Competitive positioning map shows clear white space between brand and nearest competitor
---
## Scope & Limitations
**In Scope:** Brand positioning frameworks (April Dunford), brand identity system design, brand architecture model selection (Branded House, House of Brands, Endorsed, Hybrid), competitive positioning analysis, brand health measurement, brand governance structures.
**Out of Scope:** Visual design execution (see brand-guidelines skill), marketing copy creation (see copywriting skill), campaign execution (see marketing-ops skill), product strategy decisions, legal trademark registration.
**Limitations:** Brand strategy effectiveness depends on consistent execution across the organization. Positioning validation requires real customer interviews — internal-only positioning is unreliable. Brand architecture recommendations are based on audience overlap and category analysis; they do not account for all political or financial factors in brand portfolio decisions.
---
## Scripts
| Script | Purpose | Usage |
|--------|---------|-------|
| `scripts/brand_health_dashboard.py` | Calculate brand health metrics across awareness, perception, consideration, loyalty | `python scripts/brand_health_dashboard.py survey_data.json --json` |
| `scripts/positioning_map_generator.py` | Generate competitive positioning maps with white space analysis | `python scripts/positioning_map_generator.py competitors.json --demo` |
| `scripts/brand_architecture_analyzer.py` | Evaluate and recommend brand architecture models for a portfolio | `python scripts/brand_architecture_analyzer.py portfolio.json --json` |