Back to skills
SKILL.md
Wiki Debunker
ASecurityUse when wiki content contains factual claims about decisions, timelines, who-said-what, or technical facts that could be fabricated. Verifies against git history, issue tickets, meeting transcripts, and PRs. Invoked by wiki-orchestrator as ADVISORY gate.
- 8 stars
- 0 votes
- 0 copies
- 0 views
- Added October 6, 2026
Works with
Security analysis
100/100Pro scans all 3 files and shows the line behind each finding
npx -y skills add bordenet/superpowers-plus --skill wiki-debunker --agent claude-codeAre you the author of Wiki Debunker?
Add the live security badge to your README. It updates with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/bordenet-wiki-debunker)---
name: wiki-debunker
disable-model-invocation: true
source: superpowers-plus
triggers: ["verify these claims", "fact-check this", "is this accurate", "cite sources for", "find evidence for"]
anti_triggers: ["write wiki page", "edit wiki", "update wiki content"]
description: Use when wiki content contains factual claims about decisions, timelines, who-said-what, or technical facts that could be fabricated. Verifies against git history, issue tickets, meeting transcripts, and PRs. Invoked by wiki-orchestrator as ADVISORY gate.
summary: "Use when: posting comments or updates to wiki pages. Evidence before assertion."
composition:
consumes: [markdown-content]
produces: [verified-facts]
capabilities: [validates-facts]
priority: 30
optional: true
coordination:
group: wiki
order: 2
requires: []
enables: []
escalates_to: ['wiki-orchestrator']
internal: false
---
# wiki-debunker
Fact-check wiki claims about decisions, timelines, who-said-what, and task
ownership. **NO CLAIM WITHOUT CITATION.** Wrong skill? Version / config /
file-path drift → `wiki-verify` · Edit pipeline → `wiki-orchestrator` · Links
→ `link-verification`.
## When to Use
- When asked to fact-check, verify claims, or find evidence for a wiki page's assertions
- Triggered by: `verify these claims`, `fact-check this`, `is this accurate`, `cite sources for`
- Wrong skill? Version/file-path drift → `wiki-verify` · Edit pipeline → `wiki-orchestrator` · Links → `link-verification`
## Source authority matrix
| Claim type | Authoritative | NOT authoritative |
|------------|---------------|-------------------|
| Task ownership | Issue tracker assignee | Wiki plan tables, meeting notes |
| Code authorship | `git blame`, PR author | Wiki mentions, verbal claims |
| Decision made | Issue ticket, PR, meeting transcript | Wiki summaries, secondhand accounts |
| Timeline / date | Git tags, deploy logs | Wiki roadmap tables |
| Current state | Live config, API response | Wiki architecture docs (may be stale) |
**Source laundering:** Wiki plan tables describe *intent*; issue tracker
describes *current state*. Always verify ownership claims against current state.
## Procedure
### 1 — Fetch and extract claims
```bash
tools/wiki-read.sh get "$PAGE_ID" | jq -r '.text' > page.md
# Extract candidate lines: dates, names, "decided", "caused", quotes, %
grep -nE '[0-9]{4}-[0-9]{2}-[0-9]{2}|\b(decided|caused|owns|authored|[0-9]+%)\b|"[^"]{10,}"' page.md
```
### 2 — Verify each claim against authoritative source
| Claim pattern | Verification command |
|---------------|----------------------|
| Date `YYYY-MM-DD` decision | `git log --after=<date-1> --before=<date+1> --all` |
| "We decided to ..." | `gh issue list --search "<keywords>" --state all` |
| "X owns Y" | Issue tracker assignee query (`gh`, Linear, Jira) |
| "PR #NNN did X" | `gh pr view NNN` |
| "Reduced by N%" | Find the measurement commit or ticket |
| "Caused the outage" | Incident report + postmortem |
Per `references/verification-commands.md` for platform-specific recipes.
### 3 — Mark each claim
`✅ VERIFIED` · `⚠️🔄 SOURCED BUT UNVERIFIED` · `⚠️ UNCITED` · `❌ CONTRADICTED`.
### 4 — Report (template in `references/report-format.md`)
Every citation must include a verifiable URL, commit SHA, or ticket ID. No
prose-only citations. `❌ CONTRADICTED` findings → halt Stage 6 and ask user
before publish.
## Hallucination red flags
| Red flag | Example | Verify via |
|----------|---------|------------|
| Precise date, no evidence | "Decided on Jan 15" | Git log bracketed by that date |
| "We decided" without reference | "We decided to use Redis" | Ticket / PR search |
| Possessive attribution from wiki | "Junyi's queries" | Issue tracker assignee |
| Exact percentage, no data source | "Reduced errors by 43%" | Measurement ticket / commit |
| Causal language without evidence | "This caused the outage" | Incident report |
## Failure modes
| Failure | Fix |
|---------|-----|
| No authoritative source found | Mark UNVERIFIED + `citation-needed` tag; do not guess |
| Git history too shallow | Fall back to meeting transcripts, ticket history, PR comments |
| Fabricated plausible citation | Every citation MUST carry URL, commit SHA, or ticket ID |
## Companion skills
wiki-verify · link-verification · wiki-content-coherence ·
issue-comment-debunker · wiki-orchestrator (invokes this as Stage 6)
Files in this skill
- references/report-format.md
- references/verification-commands.md
- skill.md
Attribution
Comments
Loading comments…