Skip to content
Back to skills

Optimize

ASecurity

Optimize a measurable metric with bounded iterations, guardrails, and regression gates.

  • 28 stars
  • 0 votes
  • 0 copies
  • 0 views
  • Added May 27, 2026
data-aipythongorailsgitperformance

Works with

  • cli

Security analysis

A100/100

Scanned October 7, 2026

npx -y skills add Borda/AI-Rig --skill optimize --agent claude-code

Installs into .claude/skills of the current project.

Are you the author of Optimize?

Add the live security badge to your README. It updates with every re-scan.

Security grade badge for Optimize
[![Security: A — Skills Directory](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/api/skills/borda-optimize/badge)](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/borda-optimize)

More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page. Keep it an A: scan every change in CI with Pro.

Download with Pro
SKILL.md
---
name: optimize
description: Optimize a measurable metric with bounded iterations, guardrails, and regression gates.
---

> Before asking, read [User Questions](../../shared/codex-user-questions.md). Waits, plan updates, and test runs follow [Agent Waits](../../shared/native-skill-contract.md#agent-waits), [Plan Updates](../../shared/native-skill-contract.md#plan-updates), and [Sandboxed Test Runs](../../shared/native-skill-contract.md#sandboxed-test-runs).

# Optimize

> Task-size routing follows [Proportional Execution](../../shared/native-skill-contract.md#proportional-execution); this skill's specialized lifecycle and acceptance checks remain authoritative.

Metric-driven optimization with explicit guards, rollback criteria, experiment log.

## Input Schema

```json
{
  "goal": "required measurable improvement objective",
  "mode": "single|campaign",
  "metric_cmd": "required command that emits or validates the target metric",
  "metric_direction": "higher|lower",
  "guard_cmd": "required command that must continue to pass",
  "max_iterations": "optional integer, default 1",
  "min_delta": "optional practical significance threshold",
  "scope_files": [
    "paths the optimization may edit"
  ],
  "done_when": "metric improves without guard regression"
}
```

## Workflow

### 01: Create run directory

Run `create_run.py --skill optimize` per `../../shared/helper-cli-contract.md`.

### 02: Validate metric and guard commands

Require:

- Repeatable `metric_cmd` producing comparable value or pass/fail.
- Known `metric_direction`.
- `guard_cmd` fails on unacceptable regressions.
- Bounded `scope_files`.
- Explicit, bounded `max_iterations` for `campaign`.
- Protect files/scripts used by `metric_cmd`/`guard_cmd` unless user explicitly scopes them and accepts measurement-integrity risk.

Dry-run both before edit:

Execute configured `metric_cmd` and `guard_cmd` separately with host-native command runner. Write complete combined output to `<run-directory>/metric-baseline.txt` and `<run-directory>/guard-baseline.txt`; retain both exit codes and stop before editing if either command cannot run.

### 03: Record baseline and hypothesis

Write `<run-directory>/hypothesis.md`:

- metric to improve
- expected mechanism
- files allowed to change
- guard risk
- rollback condition

For `campaign`, noisy metrics, GPU/ML performance, or correctness-sensitive code, read and apply `../../shared/specialist-orchestration.md`; otherwise do not load it. Write `<run-directory>/specialist-optimization-plan.md` with narrow context packs for:

- `squeezer`: profiling mechanism, bottleneck hypothesis, measurement plan.
- `qa-specialist`: guard coverage and regression risk.
- `data-steward`: data pipeline or reproducibility impact.
- `scientist`: metric validity, ablation design, statistical noise.
- `challenger`: overfitting to metric or weakening guard checks.

No fan-out for one small measured change with stable metric/guard. Never let specialist change metric/guard scripts unless explicitly in `scope_files` and measurement-integrity risk recorded.

**Structural context (optional)**: when `scope_files` resolves to Python module/symbol, select one task-neutral route and probe codemap-py once before first iteration: `PLUGIN_ROOT/bin/python PLUGIN_ROOT/shared/codemap_adapter.py context --category implementation --query-kind <kind> [--target <qname>] --out <run-directory>/codemap-context.json`. Use `skip` for exact localized optimization with no unresolved structural fact, matching single route (`central`, `callers`, `blast`, `dependencies`, `test-impact`, or `coupling`) for one unresolved fact, `standard` for broad or unknown scope. Map direct, all, or production caller questions to `callers`; use `blast` only for explicitly transitive caller questions. An explicit user or tool request for structural evidence overrides `skip`. Per `../../shared/codemap-contract.md`, absence/incompatibility is non-fatal — continue with hypothesis above. Persist result once here, before step 04 applies any change; any triggered specialist consumes `<run-directory>/codemap-context.json`, never fresh query.

Initialize machine-readable iteration log:

Create empty `<run-directory>/experiments.jsonl` with filesystem tool before first iteration.

### 04: Apply one minimal optimization change per iteration

One independent hypothesis per iteration. Never optimize unmeasured paths. Before each, write `<run-directory>/iteration-<n>-before.patch` with scoped-file diff. If iteration fails and only its patch is present, revert with `git apply -R` against iteration diff; otherwise fail run when clean reversal cannot be proven. Never use `git reset --hard`.

### 05: Re-measure

Re-run same retained `metric_cmd` and `guard_cmd` separately with host-native command runner. Write complete combined output to `<run-directory>/iteration-<n>-metric-after.txt` and `<run-directory>/iteration-<n>-guard-after.txt`; retain both exit codes.

### 06: Compare baseline and after results in `<run-directory>/comparison.md`

Required fields:

- baseline value
- after value
- delta
- guard status
- confidence
- noise caveats

Append one JSON object/iteration to `<run-directory>/experiments.jsonl`:

```json
{
  "iteration": 1,
  "hypothesis": "one-line mechanism",
  "metric_before": 0.0,
  "metric_after": 0.0,
  "delta": 0.0,
  "guard": "pass|fail",
  "decision": "kept|reverted|inconclusive|failed",
  "rollback_evidence": "path or reason"
}
```

### 07: Decide keep/revert

- Keep only with intended metric movement and passing guards.
- With `min_delta`, keep only if delta meets/exceeds practical-significance threshold.
- Revert or fail on guard regression.
- For noisy measurement, repeat or mark inconclusive.
- In `campaign`, stop at first kept result unless user asked continued exploration; otherwise continue only while `max_iterations` remains and each rejected iteration has rollback evidence.

### 08: Run shared quality gates

Inspect `PLUGIN_ROOT/bin/python PLUGIN_ROOT/shared/run_gates.py --help`. Tests runs configured test or guard command; give real commands or explicit reasons for other gates.

### 09: Write and validate the mandatory result artifact

Follow `../../shared/helper-cli-contract.md` and authoritative help. Write `OPTIMIZE_METADATA`, validate as `optimize`, promote only validated candidate.

## Fail-Fast Rules

1. Missing metric or guard command => fail.
2. Baseline cannot be captured => fail.
3. Scope is unbounded => fail.
4. Guard regression after change => fail unless reverted.
5. Metric/guard script changed without explicit scope and measurement-integrity note => fail.
6. Campaign iteration rejected without rollback evidence or unresolved-risk note => fail.
7. Claimed improvement below `min_delta` without explicit inconclusive status => fail.
8. Result artifact validator failure => fail.
9. Result artifact missing => fail.

## Quality Gates

Required:

- `tests`: guard command or impacted tests.
- `review`: metric comparison, rollback decision, relevant campaign ledger, `git diff --check`.
- `artifact`: shared validator confirms comparison, experiments JSONL, gate logs, result JSON shape.

Recommended:

- `lint`, `format`, `types`: run for any code edits.

## Calibration Hooks

On metric/guard-policy change, update calibration:

- behavioral cases: baseline missing, guard regression, noisy metric overclaim, campaign rollback evidence, below-threshold improvement, artifact validator bypass
- benchmark patterns: `optimize`

## Output Contract

Before writing result candidate, follow `../../shared/final-handoff-contract.md`: render and bind `final-handoff.json`, `final.md`, and `final-handoff.validation.json`; after both validators and promotion pass, emit `final.md` verbatim.

Use `../../shared/quality-gates.md`.

### Final chat

Final chat follows shared frame with `Next steps`. `Outcome`: `kept|reverted|inconclusive|failed`. `Results`: exactly `Iteration | Baseline | After | Delta | Guard | Decision`, one row/material iteration or campaign. Include method, guards, uncertainty, deferred experiments, noise limits.

Minimum artifact payload template: `result-template.json`.

Attribution

Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.

Comments

Loading comments…

Newsletter

Get the weekly list of safe new skills, and the ones we pulled.