Use when benchmarking hex-line MCP against Claude built-in tools with scenario manifests, activation checks, and diff-based correctness.
Scanned 9/4/2026
Install to Claude Code
npx -y skills add boisenoise/skills-collections --skill levn-ln-840-benchmark-compare --agent claude-codeInstalls into .claude/skills of the current project.
Are you the author of Levn Ln 840 Benchmark Compare?
Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/boisenoise-levn-ln-840-benchmark-compare)More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page.
---
name: ln-840-benchmark-compare
description: "Use when benchmarking hex-line MCP against Claude built-in tools with scenario manifests, activation checks, and diff-based correctness."
license: MIT
model: claude-haiku-4-5
---
> **Paths:** File paths (`shared/`, `references/`) are relative to skills repo root. Locate this SKILL.md directory and go up one level for repo root.
# Benchmark Compare
**Type:** L3 Worker
**Category:** 8XX Optimization -> 840 Benchmark
Run a clean A/B benchmark in Claude Code: one session with built-in tools only, one with `hex-line`. The benchmark is scenario-based, diff-validated, manifest-driven, and runtime-backed. It measures activation, correctness, time, cost, and tokens. The current runner is intentionally scoped to this internal A/B. It does not, by itself, prove best-in-class against external alternatives.
---
## Input / Output
| Direction | Content |
|-----------|----------|
| **Input** | Repo checkout containing `mcp/hex-line-mcp/`, optional `references/goals.md`, optional `references/expectations.json` |
| **Output** | Comparison report in `skills-catalog/ln-840-benchmark-compare/results/{date}-comparison.md` plus machine-readable benchmark summary artifact |
---
## Prerequisites
- `claude --version` succeeds
- `git` succeeds
- `mcp/hex-line-mcp/server.mjs` exists
- `mcp/hex-line-mcp/hook.mjs` exists
- `skills-catalog/ln-840-benchmark-compare/references/goals.md` exists
- `skills-catalog/ln-840-benchmark-compare/references/expectations.json` exists
- `skills-catalog/ln-840-benchmark-compare/references/mcp-bench.json` exists
---
## Quick Run
```bash
bash skills-catalog/ln-840-benchmark-compare/scripts/run-benchmark.sh \
[skills-catalog/ln-840-benchmark-compare/references/goals.md] \
[skills-catalog/ln-840-benchmark-compare/references/expectations.json]
```
Optional extra session profile:
```bash
EXTRA_SESSION_ID=other-mcp \
EXTRA_SESSION_LABEL="Other MCP" \
EXTRA_MCP_CONFIG=/abs/path/to/other-mcp.json \
EXTRA_SETTINGS='{"disableAllHooks":true}' \
bash skills-catalog/ln-840-benchmark-compare/scripts/run-benchmark.sh
```
### Monitor Integration (Claude Code 2.1.98+)
**MANDATORY READ:** Load `shared/references/monitor_integration_pattern.md`
Stream benchmark progress:
`Monitor(command="bash skills-catalog/ln-840-benchmark-compare/scripts/run-benchmark.sh 2>&1 | grep --line-buffered -E 'scenario|PASS|FAIL|error|session'", timeout_ms=3600000, description="benchmark run")`
Fallback: `Bash(run_in_background=true)`.
The runner handles:
- syntax preflight
- SessionStart preflight
- scenario extraction from `goals.md`
- isolated worktrees per scenario/session
- per-scenario diffs
- final comparison report
Current scope:
- built-in Claude session
- Claude plus `hex-line`
- optional third Claude-compatible session profile through `EXTRA_SESSION_*` environment variables
External baseline note:
- use the same `goals.md` and `expectations.json`
- do not rewrite scenarios to fit the external tool
- do not make "top tool" claims from the internal A/B alone
- the optional third session profile is only valid when it can emit the same `stream-json` log shape and diff artifacts
---
## Workflow
### Phase 1: Define The Canonical Suite
Use one canonical pair owned by this skill:
- `skills-catalog/ln-840-benchmark-compare/references/goals.md`
- `skills-catalog/ln-840-benchmark-compare/references/expectations.json`
Rules:
- The suite must be a balanced mix of common engineering scenarios.
- Do not design the suite to favor `hex-line`.
- Every scenario in `goals.md` must have a matching entry in `expectations.json`.
- `expectations.json` is the source of truth for correctness.
- The same pair must be reused unchanged for any future external baseline.
Supported expectation fields per scenario:
| Field | Meaning |
|-------|---------|
| `id` | Scenario identifier used in result filenames |
| `expectedChangedFiles` | Files that must change |
| `forbiddenChangedFiles` | Files that must not change |
| `requiredDiffPatterns` | Regex patterns required in the saved diff |
| `forbiddenDiffPatterns` | Regex patterns that must not appear in the diff |
| `requiredResultPatterns` | Regex patterns required in the final assistant result text |
| `requiredCommands` | Regex patterns that must match at least one Bash command |
| `exactChangedFiles` | If `true`, no extra changed files are allowed |
### Phase 2: Preflight
The runner must pass:
- `node --check server.mjs`
- `node --check hook.mjs`
- `node --check extract-scenarios.mjs`
- `node --check parse-results.mjs`
- SessionStart smoke check from `hook.mjs`
If preflight fails, the benchmark is invalid and must stop before scenarios run.
### Phase 3: Execute Per Scenario
For each `##` scenario in `goals.md`:
1. generate a standalone prompt file
2. create two clean worktrees from the same commit
3. run built-in Claude session
4. run hex-line Claude session
5. save `.jsonl` logs and `.diff.txt` artifacts
6. remove both worktrees
Built-in session:
- no MCP
- hooks disabled
Hex-line session:
- resolved MCP config pointing to `server.mjs`
- `outputStyle: "hex-line"`
- `PreToolUse` hook through `hook.mjs`
### Phase 4: Parse Results
`parse-results.mjs` evaluates each scenario for both sessions.
Scenario pass requires:
- valid run
- successful session completion
- changed files match expectations
- diff patterns match expectations
- result text patterns match expectations
- required commands were actually executed
### Phase 5: Read The Report
The final report has these sections:
- Scenario Outcomes
- Activation
- Time
- Cost
- Tokens
- Tool Totals
- Validity
Interpretation rules:
- `invalid run` means setup/adoption failure, not product performance
- scenario `FAIL` means correctness contract was not met
- activation is part of product quality for `hex-line`, not external noise
- this report is necessary for internal A/B evaluation, but not sufficient for best-alternative claims
---
## Report Contract
`skills-catalog/ln-840-benchmark-compare/results/{date}-comparison.md` must answer:
- Did each scenario complete correctly?
- Did `hex-line` activate cleanly without discovery drift?
- What changed in wall time, API time, cost, output tokens, and total tool calls?
- Was the run valid?
Do not treat raw time/cost as sufficient without scenario correctness.
## External Baseline Policy
- This skill owns the canonical suite, not a universal leaderboard.
- If maintainers compare `hex-line` against external alternatives, they must reuse the same `goals.md`, `expectations.json`, and diff-based evaluation rules.
- External runs may use different harnesses, but they must preserve the same task text, starting commit, and correctness contract.
- If an external tool cannot satisfy the contract format, record that as a harness limitation instead of rewriting the suite to accommodate it.
- A report that only covers built-in Claude vs `hex-line` must say so explicitly.
---
## Runtime Contract
**MANDATORY READ:** Load shared/references/benchmark_worker_runtime_contract.md, shared/references/coordinator_summary_contract.md
Runtime CLI:
```bash
node shared/scripts/benchmark-worker-runtime/cli.mjs start --skill ln-840-benchmark-compare --identifier suite-default --manifest-file <file>
node shared/scripts/benchmark-worker-runtime/cli.mjs checkpoint --skill ln-840-benchmark-compare --identifier suite-default --phase PHASE_0_CONFIG --payload '{...}'
node shared/scripts/benchmark-worker-runtime/cli.mjs record-summary --skill ln-840-benchmark-compare --identifier suite-default --payload '{...}'
node shared/scripts/benchmark-worker-runtime/cli.mjs complete --skill ln-840-benchmark-compare --identifier suite-default
```
Required state fields:
- `report_ready`
- `summary_recorded`
- `final_result`
- `self_check_passed`
Domain checkpoints:
- `PHASE_0_CONFIG`
- `PHASE_1_PREFLIGHT`
- `PHASE_2_LOAD_SUITE`
- `PHASE_3_RUN_SCENARIOS`
- `PHASE_4_PARSE_RESULTS`
- `PHASE_5_WRITE_REPORT`
- `PHASE_6_WRITE_SUMMARY`
- `PHASE_7_SELF_CHECK`
Guard rules:
- do not advance without checkpointing the current phase
- do not complete before `benchmark-worker` summary is recorded
- do not complete before self-check passes
### Runtime Coordination
- Managed runs may pass deterministic `runId` and exact `summaryArtifactPath`.
- Standalone runs are supported. If both are omitted, runtime creates a standalone run and writes the default summary artifact path for the `benchmark-worker` family.
---
## Runtime Summary Artifact
**MANDATORY READ:** Load shared/references/coordinator_summary_contract.md
Emit a `benchmark-worker` summary envelope after the comparison report is written.
Managed mode:
- write to the exact `summaryArtifactPath`
Standalone mode:
- write `.hex-skills/runtime-artifacts/runs/{run_id}/benchmark-worker/ln-840-benchmark-compare--{identifier}.json`
Recommended payload:
- `scenarios_total`
- `scenarios_passed`
- `scenarios_failed`
- `activation_valid`
- `validity_verdict`
- `report_path`
- `warnings`
- `metrics`
---
## Known Pitfalls
| Pitfall | Solution |
|---------|----------|
| SessionStart not present in hex-line run | Fail preflight and stop |
| Agent drifts into `ToolSearch` before hex-line use | Treat as activation problem and capture in report |
| Worktree already exists from prior crash | Remove it before adding a new one |
| Diff artifacts missing | Treat scenario correctness as failed |
| Simple scenario favors built-ins | Keep it in the suite if it is common; honesty beats cherry-picking |
| External comparison uses edited scenarios or relaxed expectations | Treat the comparison as invalid |
---
## Definition of Done
- [ ] `goals.md` defines the canonical balanced suite
- [ ] `expectations.json` fully describes scenario correctness
- [ ] Runner passes syntax and SessionStart preflight
- [ ] Each scenario runs in two clean worktrees from the same commit
- [ ] Parser evaluates activation and scenario correctness from logs plus diffs
- [ ] Final report is saved to `skills-catalog/ln-840-benchmark-compare/results/`
- [ ] `benchmark-worker` summary artifact is written to the managed or standalone runtime path
- [ ] Temporary worktrees are removed
- [ ] Report states clearly whether it is internal A/B only or includes additional external baselines
---
**Version:** 2.0.0
**Last Updated:** 2026-03-24
Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!