Plans automated tests (E2E/Integration/Unit) using Risk-Based Testing after manual testing. Calculates priorities, delegates to ln-301-task-creator. Worker for ln-510.
Scanned 9/4/2026
Install to Claude Code
npx -y skills add boisenoise/skills-collections --skill levn-ln-513-auto-test-planner --agent claude-codeInstalls into .claude/skills of the current project.
Are you the author of Levn Ln 513 Auto Test Planner?
Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/boisenoise-levn-ln-513-auto-test-planner)More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page.
---
name: ln-513-auto-test-planner
description: Plans automated tests (E2E/Integration/Unit) using Risk-Based Testing after manual testing. Calculates priorities, delegates to ln-301-task-creator. Worker for ln-510.
---
# Automated Test Planner
Creates Story test task with comprehensive automated test coverage (E2E/Integration/Unit) based on Risk-Based Testing methodology and REAL manual testing results.
## Purpose & Scope
- **Create** comprehensive test task for Story automation
- **Calculate** risk-based priorities (Impact × Probability)
- **Generate** 11-section test plan from manual test results
- **Delegate** to ln-301-task-creator (CREATE) or ln-302-task-replanner (REPLAN)
- **NOT** for: manual testing (ln-512), research (ln-511), orchestration (ln-510)
## When to Use This Skill
This skill should be used when:
- **Invoked by ln-510-test-planner** after ln-511 research and ln-512 manual testing
- All implementation tasks in Story are Done
- Manual testing results documented in Linear comment (from ln-512)
- Research findings available in Linear comment (from ln-511)
**Prerequisites:**
- All implementation Tasks in Story status = Done
- ln-511-test-researcher completed (research comment exists)
- ln-512-manual-tester completed (manual test results in Linear comment)
**Automation:** Supports `autoApprove: true` (default when invoked by ln-510) to skip manual confirmation.
## When NOT to Use
Do NOT use if:
- Manual testing NOT completed → Wait for ln-512
- Research NOT completed → Wait for ln-511
- Implementation tasks NOT all Done → Complete impl tasks first
## Workflow
### Phase 1: Discovery (Automated)
Auto-discovers Team ID from `docs/tasks/kanban_board.md` (see CLAUDE.md "Configuration Auto-Discovery").
**Input:** Story ID from orchestrator (ln-510)
### Phase 2: Story + Tasks Analysis (NO Dialog)
**Step 0: Study Project Test Files**
1. Scan for test-related files:
- tests/README.md (commands, setup, environment)
- Test configs (jest.config.js, vitest.config.ts, pytest.ini)
- Existing test structure (tests/, __tests__/ directories)
- Coverage config (.coveragerc, coverage.json)
2. Extract: test commands, framework, patterns, coverage thresholds
3. Ensures test planning aligns with project practices
**Step 1: Load Research and Manual Test Results**
1. Fetch Story from Linear (must have label "user-story")
2. Extract Story.id (UUID) - Use UUID, NOT short ID (required for Linear API)
3. Load research comment (from ln-511): "## Test Research: {Feature}"
4. Load manual test results comment (from ln-512): "## Manual Testing Results"
- If not found → ERROR: Run ln-510-test-planner pipeline first
5. Parse sections: AC results (PASS/FAIL), Edge Cases, Error Handling, Integration flows
6. Map to test design: PASSED AC → E2E, Edge cases → Unit, Errors → Error handling, Flows → Integration
**Step 2: Analyze Story + Tasks**
1. Parse Story: Goal, Test Strategy, Technical Notes
2. Fetch **all child Tasks** (parentId = Story.id, status = Done) from Linear
3. Analyze each Task:
- Components implemented
- Business logic added
- Integration points created
- Conditional branches (if/else/switch)
4. Identify what needs testing
### Phase 3: Parsing Strategy for Manual Test Results
**Process:** Locate Linear comment with "Manual Testing Results" header → Verify Format Version 1.0 → Extract structured sections (Acceptance Criteria, Test Results by AC, Edge Cases, Error Handling, Integration Testing) using regex → Validate (at least 1 PASSED AC, AC count matches Story, completeness check) → Map parsed data to test design structure
**Error Handling:** Missing comment → ERROR (run ln-512 first), Missing format version → WARNING (try legacy parsing), Required section missing → ERROR (re-run ln-512), No PASSED AC → ERROR (fix implementation)
### Phase 4: Risk-Based Test Planning (Automated)
**MANDATORY READ:** Load `references/risk_based_testing_guide.md` for complete methodology.
**E2E-First Approach:** Prioritize by business risk (Priority = Impact x Probability), not coverage metrics.
**Workflow:**
**Step 1: Risk Assessment**
Calculate Priority for each scenario from manual testing:
```
Priority = Business Impact (1-5) x Probability (1-5)
```
**Decision Criteria:**
- Priority >=15 → **MUST test**
- Priority 9-14 → **SHOULD test** if not covered
- Priority <=8 → **SKIP** (manual testing sufficient)
**Step 2: E2E Test Selection (2-5):** Baseline 2 (positive + negative) ALWAYS + 0-3 additional (Priority >=15 only)
**Step 3: Unit Test Selection (0-15):** DEFAULT 0. Add ONLY for complex business logic (Priority >=15): financial, security, algorithms
**Step 4: Integration Test Selection (0-8):** DEFAULT 0. Add ONLY if E2E gaps AND Priority >=15: rollback, concurrency, external API errors
**Step 5: Validation:** Limits 2-28 total (realistic goal: 2-7). Auto-trim if >7 (keep 2 baseline + top 5 by Priority)
### Phase 5: Test Task Generation (Automated)
Generates complete test task per `test_task_template.md` (11 sections):
**Sections 1-7:** Context, Risk Matrix, E2E/Integration/Unit Tests (with Priority scores + justifications), Coverage, DoD
**Section 8:** Existing Tests to Fix (analysis of affected tests from implementation tasks)
**Section 9:** Infrastructure Changes (packages, Docker, configs - based on test dependencies)
**Section 10:** Documentation Updates (README, CHANGELOG, tests/README, config docs)
**Section 11:** Legacy Code Cleanup (deprecated patterns, backward compat, dead code)
Shows preview for review.
### Phase 6: Confirmation & Delegation
**Step 1:** Preview generated test plan (always displayed for transparency)
**Step 2:** Confirmation logic:
- **autoApprove: true** (default from ln-510) → proceed automatically
- **Manual run** → prompt user to type "confirm"
**Step 3:** Check for existing test task
Query Linear: `list_issues(parentId=Story.id, labels=["tests"])`
**Decision:**
- **Count = 0** → **CREATE MODE** (Step 4a)
- **Count >= 1** → **REPLAN MODE** (Step 4b)
**Step 4a: CREATE MODE** (if Count = 0)
Invoke ln-301-task-creator worker with taskType: "test"
**Pass to worker:**
- taskType, teamId, storyData (Story.id, title, AC, Technical Notes, Context)
- researchFindings (from ln-511 comment)
- manualTestResults (from ln-512 comment)
- testPlan (e2eTests, integrationTests, unitTests, riskPriorityMatrix)
- infrastructureChanges, documentationUpdates, legacyCleanup
**Worker returns:** Task URL + summary
**Step 4b: REPLAN MODE** (if Count >= 1)
Invoke ln-302-task-replanner worker with taskType: "test"
**Pass to worker:**
- Same data as CREATE MODE + existingTaskIds
**Worker returns:** Operations summary + warnings
**Step 5:** Return summary to orchestrator (ln-510)
---
## Definition of Done
**Research and Manual Results Loaded:**
- [ ] Research comment "## Test Research: {Feature}" found (from ln-511)
- [ ] Manual test results "## Manual Testing Results" found (from ln-512)
- [ ] At least 1 AC marked as PASSED
**Risk-Based Test Plan Generated:**
- [ ] Risk Priority Matrix calculated for all scenarios
- [ ] E2E tests (2-5): Baseline 2 + additional 0-3 with Priority >=15
- [ ] Integration tests (0-8): ONLY if E2E doesn't cover AND Priority >=15
- [ ] Unit tests (0-15): ONLY complex business logic with Priority >=15
- [ ] **Total tests: 2-7 realistic goal** (hard limit: 2-28)
- [ ] No framework/library testing: Each test validates OUR business logic only
**Test Task Description Complete (11 sections):**
- [ ] All 11 sections populated per template
- [ ] Risk Priority Matrix included
- [ ] Each test beyond baseline 2 justified
**Worker Delegation Executed:**
- [ ] CREATE MODE: Delegated to ln-301-task-creator
- [ ] REPLAN MODE: Delegated to ln-302-task-replanner
- [ ] Linear Issue URL returned
**Output:**
- **CREATE MODE:** Linear Issue URL + confirmation
- **REPLAN MODE:** Operations summary + URLs
## Reference Files
- **Risk-based testing methodology:** `shared/references/risk_based_testing.md`
- **Auto-discovery patterns:** `shared/references/auto_discovery_pattern.md`
### risk_based_testing_guide.md
**Purpose**: Risk-Based Testing methodology (detailed guide)
**Location**: [references/risk_based_testing_guide.md](references/risk_based_testing_guide.md)
### test_task_template.md (CENTRALIZED)
**Location**: `shared/templates/test_task_template.md`
**Usage**: Workers (ln-301, ln-302) load via Template Loading logic
## Best Practices
**Minimum Viable Testing:** Start with 2 E2E tests (positive + negative). Add more ONLY with critical justification. Realistic goal: 2-7 tests per Story.
**Risk-Based Testing:** Prioritize by Business Impact x Probability. E2E-first from ACTUAL manual testing results. Priority >=15 scenarios covered by tests.
**Expected-Based Testing:** For deterministic tests, compare actual vs expected using `diff`. See [ln-512-manual-tester Test Design Principles](../ln-512-manual-tester/SKILL.md#test-design-principles).
---
**Version:** 1.0.0 (Initial release - extracted from ln-510-test-planner)
**Last Updated:** 2026-01-15
Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!