Runs parallel external agent reviews (Codex + Gemini) on code changes. Process-as-arrive, critical verification with debate. Returns filtered suggestions.
Scanned 9/4/2026
Install to Claude Code
npx -y skills add boisenoise/skills-collections --skill levn-ln-513-agent-reviewer --agent claude-codeInstalls into .claude/skills of the current project.
Are you the author of Levn Ln 513 Agent Reviewer?
Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/boisenoise-levn-ln-513-agent-reviewer)More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page.
---
name: ln-513-agent-reviewer
description: "Runs parallel external agent reviews (Codex + Gemini) on code changes. Process-as-arrive, critical verification with debate. Returns filtered suggestions."
license: MIT
---
> **Paths:** File paths (`shared/`, `references/`, `../ln-*`) are relative to skills repo root. If not found at CWD, locate this SKILL.md directory and go up one level for repo root.
# Agent Reviewer (Code)
Runs parallel external agent reviews on code implementation, critically verifies suggestions, returns filtered improvements.
## Purpose & Scope
- Worker in ln-510 quality coordinator pipeline (invoked by ln-510 Phase 4)
- Run codex-review + gemini-review as background tasks in parallel
- Process results as they arrive (first-finished agent processed immediately)
- Critically verify each suggestion; debate with agent if Claude disagrees
- Return filtered, deduplicated, verified suggestions with confidence scoring
- Health check + prompt execution in single invocation
## When to Use
- **Invoked by ln-510-quality-coordinator** Phase 4 (Agent Review)
- All implementation tasks in Story status = Done
- Code quality (ln-511) and tech debt cleanup (ln-512) already completed
## Parameters
| Parameter | Value |
|-----------|-------|
| `review_type` | `codereview` |
| `skill_group` | `513` |
| `prompt_template` | `shared/agents/prompt_templates/code_review.md` |
| `verdict_acceptable` | `CODE_ACCEPTABLE` |
## Inputs
| Input | Required | Source | Description |
|-------|----------|--------|-------------|
| `storyId` | Yes | args, git branch, kanban, user | Story to process |
**Resolution:** Story Resolution Chain.
**Status filter:** In Progress, To Review
## Workflow
**MANDATORY READ:** Load `shared/references/input_resolution_pattern.md`, `shared/references/tools_config_guide.md`, `shared/references/storage_mode_detection.md`, `shared/references/agent_review_workflow.md`, and `shared/references/agent_delegation_pattern.md`.
### Phase 0: Resolve Inputs & Tools Config
1. **Resolve storyId** (per input_resolution_pattern.md):
- IF args provided → use args
- ELSE IF git branch matches `feature/{id}-*` → extract id
- ELSE IF kanban has exactly 1 Story in [In Progress, To Review] → suggest
- ELSE → AskUserQuestion: show Stories from kanban filtered by [In Progress, To Review]
2. Extract: `task_provider` from `docs/tools_config.md` (per tools_config_guide.md).
### Unique Steps (before shared workflow)
1) **Health check:** per shared workflow, filter by `skill_group` = `513`.
2) **Get references:**
- IF `task_provider` = `linear`: `get_issue(storyId)` → extract URL + identifier. `list_issues(filter: {parent: {id: storyId}, status: "Done"})` → extract Done implementation Task URLs/identifiers (exclude label "tests").
- IF `task_provider` = `file`: `Read story.md` → extract path. `Glob("docs/tasks/epics/*/stories/*/tasks/*.md")` → filter Done tasks (check `**Status:** Done`), exclude label "tests".
3) **Ensure .agent-review/:** per shared workflow.
4) **Build prompt:** Read template `shared/agents/prompt_templates/code_review.md`.
- Replace `{story_ref}` with `- Linear: {url}` or `- File: {path}`
- Replace `{task_refs}` with bullet list: `- {identifier}: {url_or_path}` per task
- Save to `.agent-review/{identifier}_codereview_prompt.md` (single shared file -- both agents read the same prompt)
### Shared Workflow Steps
5-8) **Load Review Memory, Run agents, Critical Verification + Debate, Aggregate + Return:** per shared workflow.
- `{review_type}` = "Code Implementation" (for challenge template)
9) **Save Review Summary:** per shared workflow "Step: Save Review Summary".
## Output Format
```yaml
verdict: CODE_ACCEPTABLE | SUGGESTIONS | SKIPPED
suggestions:
- area: "security | performance | architecture | correctness | best_practices"
issue: "What is wrong"
suggestion: "Specific fix"
confidence: 95
impact_percent: 15
source: "codex-review"
resolution: "accepted | accepted_after_debate | accepted_after_followup | rejected"
```
Agent stats and debate log per shared workflow output schema.
## Fallback Rules
Per shared workflow, plus:
| Condition | Action |
|-----------|--------|
| Parent skill (ln-510) | Falls back to Self-Review (native Claude) |
## Verdict Escalation
- Findings with `area=security` or `area=correctness` -> parent skill can escalate PASS -> CONCERNS
- This skill returns raw verified suggestions; escalation decision is made by ln-510
## Critical Rules (additional)
- **MANDATORY INVOCATION:** Parent skills MUST invoke this skill. Returns SKIPPED gracefully if agents unavailable. Parent must NOT pre-check and skip.
## Reference Files
- **Tools config:** `shared/references/tools_config_guide.md`
- **Storage mode operations:** `shared/references/storage_mode_detection.md`
- **Shared workflow:** `shared/references/agent_review_workflow.md`
- **Agent delegation pattern:** `shared/references/agent_delegation_pattern.md`
- **Prompt template (review):** `shared/agents/prompt_templates/code_review.md`
- **Challenge schema:** `shared/agents/schemas/challenge_review_schema.json`
---
**Version:** 2.0.0
**Last Updated:** 2026-02-11
Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!