测试驱动开发(红绿循环)— 来自 superpowers 体系。本 skill 是桥接层,先写失败测试再写实现,完整纪律见 <SUPERPOWERS_SKILL_ROOT>/tdd/。
Scanned 9/1/2026
Install to Claude Code
npx -y skills add BlueprintOS/analysis-to-delivery --skill tdd --agent claude-codeInstalls into .claude/skills of the current project.
Are you the author of Tdd?
Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/blueprintos-tdd)More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page.
---
name: tdd
description: 测试驱动开发(红绿循环)— 来自 superpowers 体系。本 skill 是桥接层,先写失败测试再写实现,完整纪律见 <SUPERPOWERS_SKILL_ROOT>/tdd/。
version: 4.0.0
---
# TDD(桥接到 superpowers)
## Contract
- Inputs: executable task from writing plan, test target, acceptance criteria
- Outputs: RED test, GREEN implementation, refactor notes
- Gates: RED observed before implementation; GREEN observed after implementation
- Required disciplines: `stage-gate`
- Next: `/executing-plans`
> **本仓库不维护此 skill 的内容**。完整纪律请读:
> `<SUPERPOWERS_SKILL_ROOT>/tdd/SKILL.md`
## 何时调
- writing-plans 之后
- 每个子任务开始时(红绿循环)
## 衔接点
- **产出**:RED 测试 + GREEN 实现 + REFACTOR
- **下一步**:`/executing-plans`(commit + 下一任务)
- **门控**:`disciplines/stage-gate` 第 3 层(RED 必须确认失败才能写实现)
## 降级方案(superpowers 未装时)
如果 `<SUPERPOWERS_SKILL_ROOT>/tdd/` 不存在,严格按以下 4 步红绿循环:
### 1. RED — 写失败测试
- 在 `src/test/` 写测试,**只测一个最小行为**
- 跑测试 → 必须**确认失败**(看到红色 / FAILURE,不是 BUILD SUCCESS)
- ❌ 跳过 RED = 你不知道测试到底在测什么
### 2. 最小实现
- 写**最少量**代码让测试通过(可以丑 / 可以硬编码)
- 不优化、不重构、不扩展
### 3. GREEN — 跑通
- 再跑测试 → 必须**确认通过**(看到 BUILD SUCCESS / PASSED)
- ❌ 测试莫名通过 = 测试没断言你想要的东西
### 4. REFACTOR — 重构
- 改进实现 / 抽取方法 / 命名优化
- **每次重构后必须重跑测试**确认仍 GREEN
- 改完再跑 = 唯一能防止重构破坏功能的方法
### 最小纪律摘要
- **RED 必须亲眼看到失败**:写测试 → 跑 → 看 stack trace → 才写实现
- **GREEN 后才能 REFACTOR**:实现未通过前重构 = 在错的地基上盖楼
- **测试一次只测一个行为**:堆叠断言 = 失败时不知道哪个挂了
- **不 mock 你要测的东西**:只 mock 边界 IO
### 安装提示
```bash
npx skills@latest add obra/superpowers-tdd
```
Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!
Ultra-compressed communication mode. Cuts token usage ~75% by speaking like caveman while keeping full technical accuracy. Supports intensity levels: lite, full (default), ultra, wenyan-lite, wenyan-full, wenyan-ultra. Use when user says "caveman mode", "talk like caveman", "use caveman", "less tokens", "be brief", or invokes /caveman. Also auto-triggers when token efficiency is requested.
Adversarial multi-agent planning skill. Self-orchestrates 5 hostile category members (unspecified-low, unspecified-high, deep, ultrabrain, artistry) via team-mode for ruthless cross-critique debate, distills only the defensible insights, then MANDATORILY hands the distilled insight bundle to the `plan` agent for executable plan formalization. Use when planning needs maximum rigor and surfacing of weak assumptions, blind spots, and over-engineering. Triggers: 'hyperplan', 'hpp', '/hyperplan', ...
**Complete production-ready guide for Google Gemini embeddings API** This skill provides comprehensive coverage of the `gemini-embedding-001` model for generating text embeddings, including SDK usage, REST API patterns, batch processing, RAG integration with Cloudflare Vectorize, and advanced use cases like semantic search and document clustering. ---
Interview, source-challenge, verify, save, and ADR-gate fuzzy coding requests into Codex-ready implementation specs. Use when a feature, bugfix, refactor, migration, repo-wide change, or architecture task needs user-verified requirements, source-backed decisions, durable architecture decisions, acceptance criteria, validation commands, rollout notes, saved spec/ADR files, and a Codex execution prompt. Do not use when already fully specified or when the user wants direct implementation now.
Use when a repo needs CodeGraph plus ast-grep for Codex MCP setup, exploration, impact analysis, structural search, or safe refactor planning.