Use when you need a measurable keep/discard loop — goal→KPI, baseline vs target, held-out checks, eval suites, or don't-stop-till-done against a runnable sensor. Not for ordinary ship checks where 'tests passed' is enough.
Scanned 8/31/2026
Install to Claude Code
npx -y skills add bgauryy/octocode --skill octocode-graph-eval --agent claude-codeInstalls into .claude/skills of the current project.
Are you the author of Octocode Graph Eval?
Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/bgauryy-octocode-graph-eval)More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page.
---
name: octocode-graph-eval
description: "Use when you need a measurable keep/discard loop — goal→KPI, baseline vs target, held-out checks, eval suites, or don't-stop-till-done against a runnable sensor. Not for ordinary ship checks where 'tests passed' is enough."
---
# Octocode Graph Eval
Evaluate outcomes and run improvement loops with evidence, not vibes — for one loop or a graph of loops.
Flow: `ERROR-ANALYZE → FRAME(goal→KPI) → BASELINE → LOOP → JUDGE → CAPTURE → VERIFY → SUITE-EVOLVE`.
Modes: **ErrorAnalyze** · **Define** · **Run** · **Suite** · **Benchmark** · **Audit**.
## Lobby rules
- No goal→KPI link → STOP. No measurable primary → STOP. No runnable sensor → build one before looping.
- Narrative-only accept → REJECT. Editing harness/cases/graders to pass → REJECT.
- ACCEPT only if primary moves on held-out **and** guardrails hold.
- Prefer deterministic graders; binary/LLM next; humans calibrate. Grade outcomes over paths.
- **TDD for agents:** write or select a failing case / KPI check **before** mutating the subject; green only after the change (red → green → keep|discard).
- Public benches orient; private failure suites gate ships. Distrust saturated/contaminated boards.
- Freeze the harness during an experiment; evolve the suite only between experiments.
- **Graph check:** before evaluating a multi-agent workflow, run edge detection — if no two nodes are independent (every step reads the prior step's output), it is a loop, not a graph. Build a loop.
- **Goodhart guard:** every primary KPI must have a counter-metric guardrail the agent cannot tune. Primary improving + guardrail degrading → reframe the goal, not the loop.
- **Verifier independence:** a verifier sharing the executor's context is not independent. Require fresh context before calling a result verified.
- **Anchor requirement:** every graph must have at least one node whose output cannot be argued with (tests that ran, build exit codes, type errors). No anchors → build one before trusting the graph.
## Workflow
1. Error-analyze traces into a failure taxonomy; frame success, primary/leading metrics, guardrails, and decision rule.
2. Measure a fixed-budget baseline; make the smallest subject change; keep or discard from comparable results.
3. Judge grader quality, fairness, capability versus regression, and contamination; capture one durable lesson.
4. Verify held-out results and required checks; then add new failure cases between experiments.
Stop when goal/KPI is undefined, checks did not run, the harness changed to pass, or another loop cannot change the verdict.
## Smart routes — load only what the current step needs
- When deriving failures, load `references/error-analysis.md`; when connecting intent to measures load `references/goal-kpi-cascade.md`, then fill `references/kpi-contract.md` — make success and budget explicit.
- When choosing experiment, suite, or meta scope, load `references/nested-loops.md`; before the first iteration load `references/feedback-loops.md`, then for the inner keep/discard cycle load `references/agent-loop.md` — no workable sensor, no loop.
- When the subject is a multi-agent workflow (graph of loops), load `references/graph-of-loops.md` — run edge detection first, require anchor nodes, check verifier independence, name Goodhart guardrails, then set primary KPI at the graph boundary with per-node sensors.
- When auditing that graph for structural failure risk before trusting its green lights — shared context, opaque state, no checkpoint/resume, unbounded tool permissions, missing human gates — load `references/graph-failure-modes.md`; add a suite case on a mode's first trace appearance.
- When managing or measuring subagents under eval, load `references/subagent-cookbook.md` first for the ownership split; spawn mechanics stay in `octocode-subagent`.
- When running an evaluated multi-agent iteration, load `references/subagent-protocol.md` for the frozen FRAME→verdict protocol; when choosing worker and graph-boundary metrics, load `references/subagent-kpis.md` so spawn cost is measured, not invisible.
- When defining how parent and workers talk during an evaluated run, load `references/subagent-communication.md` — bad channels create false certainty and unattributable failures; when choosing the topology itself, load `references/subagent-approaches.md` because the pattern decides which KPIs and checks matter.
- When inner loop is flat and no new hypothesis exists, suspect stuck search priors — load `references/nested-loops.md` for bilevel escalation, then `references/karpathy-patterns.md` for the Bilevel Autoresearch pattern.
- When selecting graders or statistical checks, load `references/eval-techniques.md`; when grading agent tool-call sequences or multi-turn trajectories load `references/trajectory-grading.md`; when trusting public/private suites load `references/benchmarking.md` — match evidence strength to the decision.
- When creating cases and runners, load `references/eval-harness.md`; before acceptance load `references/held-out-and-guards.md` — prevent leakage, overfitting, and greenwashing.
- When grounding methods in primary patterns, load `references/karpathy-patterns.md` — anchor techniques in proven loops.
- When a result needs another skill or durable capture, load `references/routing.md`; when closing a meta improvement cycle load `references/improve-loop.md` — transfer ownership without losing the decision rule.
- When reporting, load `references/output.md` and run `scripts/loop-report.mjs` — require goal, baseline, result, and verdict.
## Related routes and verification
- Use `octocode-research` for evidence under test; `octocode-brainstorming` before evaluating an unresolved idea; `octocode-rfc-generator` for a design KPI contract.
- Use `octocode-subagent` to fan out parallel hypotheses or benchmark trials within one iteration — measurement, keep/discard, graders, and the subagent cookbook (`references/subagent-cookbook.md`) stay frozen here.
- Use `octocode-prompt-optimizer` for wording after the KPI is fixed; `octocode-skills` for folder edits after ACCEPT.
- When changing this skill, run `scripts/check-description.mjs` then `scripts/eval-eval.mjs --self-test` and a matching `--case` — catch trigger and self-routing regressions; cases live in `evals/` (`cases.json`, `trigger-cases.json`, `kpi-contract.json`).
Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!