Design grassroots-first campaigns for organizations facing spending disadvantages against well-funded competitors. Use when planning a launch campaign, growth strategy, or marketing with limited budget vs established competitors.
Scanned 9/8/2026
Install to Claude Code
npx -y skills add bg-szy/TOP-SKILLS --skill organic-first-campaign --agent claude-codeInstalls into .claude/skills of the current project.
Are you the author of Organic First Campaign?
Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/bg-szy-organic-first-campaign)More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page.
---
name: organic-first-campaign
description: Design grassroots-first campaigns for organizations facing spending disadvantages against well-funded competitors. Use when planning a launch campaign, growth strategy, or marketing with limited budget vs established competitors.
metadata:
author: bencium
---
# Organic-First Campaign
Framework for designing grassroots-first campaigns for organizations facing resource disadvantages.
## Core Thesis
"Paid media scales attention. Organic narrative and grassroots networks scale trust."
Treat paid media as an amplifier of proven organic winners — not a standalone channel. This framework is for when your competitor outspends you.
## Six-Stage Workflow
All stages must be completed in order.
### Stage 1: Intake
Three modes based on user input detail:
- **Mode A (Full Brief)**: Skip interview; confirm understanding in one sentence; proceed
- **Mode B (Interview Mode)**: Ask 8-field questions in batches of ≤4
- **Mode C (Default/Terse)**: Ask only missing critical fields (outcome, audience, sector, budget) in one batch; default others with transparent assumption table
**Never invent specifics not provided.** Use bracketed placeholders like `[incumbent]` for competitors not named.
### Stage 2: Ideation
Before channel analysis, produce 5+ distinct campaign concepts, each with:
- Name and one-line thesis
- Primary channel tier
- Authenticity hook (real-world detail that resists faking)
- Minimum viable version testable in two weeks
### Stage 3: Asymmetry Classification
Classify spend ratio:
- **Mild**: 1:2–1:5
- **Severe**: 1:5–1:50
- **Categorical**: 1:50+
Evaluate six preconditions from the Hungarian case study (score 0–6):
1. Credible insider/founder story
2. Accumulated grievance or unmet demand
3. Consolidated challenger field
4. Felt pain (not abstract)
5. Threshold-rewarding market/system
6. Incumbent overplaying saturation
**Thresholds:**
- 5–6: proceed full strength
- 3–4: proceed but build missing preconditions during campaign
- 0–2: preconditions ARE the actual campaign — redirect there first
### Stage 3a: Message-Market Fit Gate
Three yes/no validation questions (absent evidence = "no"):
1. Have ≥10 target audience members taken the desired action without prompting?
2. Can you name specific pain phrased in the audience's own words?
3. Would ≥3 of 5 target people commit today at your intended ask level?
**Scoring:**
- 3/3: proceed to Stage 4
- 2/3: insert 1–2 week validation cycle first
- 0–1/3: **refuse to produce full campaign plan** — route to discovery work
"Distribution amplifies signal; it cannot manufacture it."
### Stage 4: Channel Stack + Allocation
**Function before cost.** Select primary function matching the bottleneck:
- Demand capture (existing intent, cannot find you)
- Paid amplification (organic works but limited reach)
- Trust compounding (find and click, but no conversion/return)
**Allocation by asymmetry:**
- Mild: 70% organic / 30% paid
- Severe: 80% organic / 20% paid
- Categorical: organic only (Tiers 1–2); refuse broad cold-paid
Critical rule: "Do not bid on your own brand-name keywords without a lift test."
### Stage 5: Campaign Execution Framework
Five mandatory sections:
1. **Competitor saturation map**: what each competitor floods; the absence that becomes your signal
2. **Three alternative shapes**: community-first, earned-media-first, search-capture-first
3. **First-30-days action list**: week-by-week with effort estimates; cuts named explicitly if capacity exceeded
4. **Ad copy + boost rules** (if paid applies): 24–48h organic traction gate before boosting; never boost without proven organic signal
5. **Lift-test plan**: one concrete experiment with hypothesis, control/test definition, and decision threshold
Plus: anti-vanity dashboard listing metrics to track vs. explicitly ignore.
## Anti-Fabrication Rules
**Never invent:**
- Competitor names or specifics not in the user's brief
- Podcast or newsletter names
- Budget numbers not provided
- Platform-specific data without user source
**Always:**
- Use `[incumbent]`, `[competitor]`, `[platform]` as placeholders
- Flag research as required week-1 action rather than inventing specifics
## When to Refuse
Refuse to produce the full campaign plan when:
- MMF Gate scores 0–1/3 (route to discovery)
- Categorical spend asymmetry + user wants broad cold-paid creative
- No genuine founder/insider voice for campaigns requiring authenticity
- Stated weekly capacity makes the plan impossible to execute
Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!