Skip to content
Back to skills

Aeon Paper Pick

ASecurity

Surface the one AI / ML paper to read today from Hugging Face Papers, with the central claim, why it's worth an hour, where it might be wrong, and a time-budgeted read order. Filters out pure benchmark-chasing and incremental scaling reports. Use as a daily morning brief input for AI-savvy operators. Triggers: "one paper to read today", "best AI paper today", "what's the must-read paper", "HF Papers top pick".

  • 1,203 stars
  • 0 votes
  • 0 copies
  • 1 view
  • Added May 28, 2026
research

Security analysis

A100/100

Scanned May 28, 2026

npx -y skills add BankrBot/skills --skill aeon-paper-pick --agent claude-code

Installs into .claude/skills of the current project.

Are you the author of Aeon Paper Pick?

Add the live security badge to your README. It updates with every re-scan.

Security grade badge for Aeon Paper Pick
[![Security: A — Skills Directory](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/api/skills/bankrbot-aeon-paper-pick/badge)](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/bankrbot-aeon-paper-pick)

More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page. Keep it an A: scan every change in CI with Pro.

Download with Pro
SKILL.md
---
name: aeon-paper-pick
description: |
  Surface the one AI / ML paper to read today from Hugging Face Papers, with the central claim,
  why it's worth an hour, where it might be wrong, and a time-budgeted read order. Filters out
  pure benchmark-chasing and incremental scaling reports. Use as a daily morning brief input
  for AI-savvy operators.
  Triggers: "one paper to read today", "best AI paper today", "what's the must-read paper",
  "HF Papers top pick".
---

# aeon-paper-pick

One paper per day. Not a digest — one pick, with a short brief that lets the reader decide whether to invest the next hour.

## How the pick works

1. Fetch last 24h of HF Papers (`https://huggingface.co/papers`).
2. Drop pure benchmark-chasing (new SOTA on existing leaderboard, no method change), incremental scaling reports, and position papers without empirical claims.
3. Score survivors on novelty of method/framing, falsifiability of central claim, reproducibility signal (code + weights + data), and cross-discipline applicability.
4. Pick the highest scoring. Tie-break: sharper falsifiable claim.

## Brief format

```
[Paper title]
Authors: A, B, C (Lab)
arXiv: 2505.xxxxx

Central claim: [one sentence, plain English]

Why it's worth an hour:
- [method shift, not benchmark bump — they replace X with Y]
- [claim is falsifiable: ablation in §4 isolates X vs not-X cleanly]
- [code + weights released, reproducible at home]

Where it might be wrong:
- [training distribution is narrow — open question whether the effect transfers]
- [comparison baseline is older than expected]

Read order:
1. §3 (method) — 8 min
2. §4 (ablations) — 12 min
3. §6 (limitations) — 5 min
Optional: §5 (extended experiments)
```

## Empty days

If 0 papers survive the filter:

```
No surviving picks today. 14 papers filtered out: 6 benchmark-chasing, 5 incremental scaling, 3 position papers.
Worth scrolling yourself: huggingface.co/papers
```

Honesty over manufactured picks.

## Rules

- One pick, not three. Three picks is a digest, and digests become wallpaper.
- "Where it might be wrong" is mandatory.
- Read order time-budgeted. Save the reader from skimming the whole PDF.
- Cite actual sections so the reader can verify the brief.

Attribution

Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.

Comments

Loading comments…

Newsletter

Get the weekly list of safe new skills, and the ones we pulled.