Skip to content
Back to skills

Product Strategy

ASecurity

YC-style product strategy assessment with forced questions and CEO scope modes — adapted from gstack /office-hours pattern

  • 43 stars
  • 0 votes
  • 0 copies
  • 2 views
  • Added September 9, 2026
businessgogitapi

Works with

  • api

Security analysis

A100/100

Scanned September 9, 2026

npx -y skills add baekenough/oh-my-customcode --skill product-strategy --agent claude-code

Installs into .claude/skills of the current project.

Are you the author of Product Strategy?

Add the live security badge to your README. It updates with every re-scan.

Security grade badge for Product Strategy
[![Security: A — Skills Directory](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/api/skills/baekenough-product-strategy/badge)](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/baekenough-product-strategy)

More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page. Keep it an A: scan every change in CI with Pro.

Download with Pro
SKILL.md
---
name: product-strategy
description: YC-style product strategy assessment with forced questions and CEO scope modes — adapted from gstack /office-hours pattern
scope: core
version: 1.0.0
user-invocable: true
argument-hint: "[product/feature name]"
effort: high
---

# Product Strategy Assessment

## Purpose

Forces rigorous product thinking by applying YC's 6 mandatory questions before any major feature decision. Prevents "build first, think later" anti-pattern.

## Usage

```
/product-strategy "new authentication system"
/product-strategy "API rate limiting redesign"
```

## Workflow

### Phase 1: YC Forced Questions

Before any implementation planning, answer ALL 6 questions. Incomplete answers block Phase 2.

| # | Question | Must Answer |
|---|----------|-------------|
| 1 | **Who is the user?** | Specific persona, not "everyone" |
| 2 | **What problem does this solve?** | Observable behavior, not assumed need |
| 3 | **How do they solve it today?** | Current workaround — if none exists, question the need |
| 4 | **Why is this solution better?** | Measurable improvement, not "it's newer" |
| 5 | **What's the smallest version that validates the hypothesis?** | MVP scope — ruthlessly cut |
| 6 | **How will you know it worked?** | Success metric, measurable within 2 weeks |

### Phase 2: CEO Scope Mode Assessment

Categorize the feature into one of 4 modes:

| Mode | Signal | Action |
|------|--------|--------|
| **Expansion** | Strong user signal + clear gap | Full implementation, invest aggressively |
| **Selective** | Mixed signals, some demand | Targeted implementation, measure before expanding |
| **Hold** | Low signal, maintenance only | Keep working, no new investment |
| **Reduction** | Negative signal, cost > value | Phase out, redirect resources |

### Phase 3: Output

Generate structured assessment:

```markdown
## Product Strategy: {feature}

### YC Assessment
1. User: {answer}
2. Problem: {answer}
3. Current solution: {answer}
4. Why better: {answer}
5. MVP: {answer}
6. Success metric: {answer}

### Scope Mode: {Expansion|Selective|Hold|Reduction}
Rationale: {why this mode}

### Recommendation
{Go / No-Go / Needs more data}
Next step: {specific action}
```

## Integration

| Rule | Interaction |
|------|-------------|
| R010 | Orchestrator invokes skill; no file writes |
| R015 | Transparent assessment — user sees all reasoning |

## Source

Adapted from [garrytan/gstack](https://github.com/garrytan/gstack) /office-hours + /plan-ceo-review patterns.

Attribution

Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.

Comments

Loading comments…

Newsletter

Get the weekly list of safe new skills, and the ones we pulled.