Before-and-After Article Revision Comparison. Use when work requires changes, retained facts, and items still lacking evidence; process the specified inputs using this method and verify the deliverable
Installs into .claude/skills of the current project.
Sponsors
SSkills DirectorySkills Directory
Know which skills are safe — weekly.
SSkills DirectorySkills Directory
Is that skill safe to install?
Are you the author of Mk 341?
Add the live security badge to your README. It updates with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/backtrue-mk-341)
---
name: mk-341
description: "Before-and-After Article Revision Comparison. Use when work requires changes, retained facts, and items still lacking evidence; process the specified inputs using this method and verify the deliverable"
---
# MK-341 | Before-and-After Article Revision Comparison
For ordinary chat, upload `packs/mk-341.md`, which includes the shared rules, this method, and required references
## Purpose
This skill delivers: **Changes, retained facts, and items still lacking evidence**
General content rewriting differs from Speak Human TW language review; do not automatically apply its review documents without an explicit trigger
## Required inputs
Provide: the full article, reader questions, sources, and actual experience or evidence
## Method steps
1. Before revising, save the first analysis, the weakest 3 checkpoints, and the original passages
2. Revise the gaps, run a second analysis, and save the results after revision
3. Deliver a before-and-after comparison and one sentence explaining why AI citation was previously difficult; do not report only an improved score
## Calculation and interpretation
Check only presence and clarity; do not invent experts, experience, or data, or guarantee AI citations
## Required output fields
| Order | Field | How to fill it in |
|---:|---|---|
| 1 | Comparison item | Original evidence, intermediate method results, or an explicit unknown; do not fabricate |
| 2 | Subject / version A | Original evidence, intermediate method results, or an explicit unknown; do not fabricate |
| 3 | Subject / version B | Original evidence, intermediate method results, or an explicit unknown; do not fabricate |
| 4 | Definition / basis | Original evidence, intermediate method results, or an explicit unknown; do not fabricate |
| 5 | Comparability | Original evidence, intermediate method results, or an explicit unknown; do not fabricate |
| 6 | Difference | Original evidence, intermediate method results, or an explicit unknown; do not fabricate |
| 7 | Source | Original evidence, intermediate method results, or an explicit unknown; do not fabricate |
| 8 | Limitations | Original evidence, intermediate method results, or an explicit unknown; do not fabricate |
## Validation cases
**MK-341-C05|Comparison periods differ in length or definition**
Expected: Do not directly compare totals; first list what is not comparable and what can safely be compared
## Method sources
Original file: SEO104_AI可引用文章檢查表
Source locator: checks
Source basis: extracted from course materials
Original URL: https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1hmaWbUWe-BsaRUVA9IpGrLUt7wQ8wdIVHe4W_Sg4uP4/edit
English translation of source excerpt retained in the master sheet:
> The task of 104: check whether an article has the conditions needed for AI citation