Source Check for Important Claims. Use when work requires a mapping of claims to sources that actually support them; process the specified inputs using this method and verify the deliverable
Installs into .claude/skills of the current project.
Sponsors
SSkills DirectorySkills Directory
Know which skills are safe — weekly.
SSkills DirectorySkills Directory
Is that skill safe to install?
Are you the author of Mk 334?
Add the live security badge to your README. It updates with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/backtrue-mk-334)
---
name: mk-334
description: "Source Check for Important Claims. Use when work requires a mapping of claims to sources that actually support them; process the specified inputs using this method and verify the deliverable"
---
# MK-334 | Source Check for Important Claims
For ordinary chat, upload `packs/mk-334.md`, which includes the shared rules, this method, and required references
## Purpose
This skill delivers: **A mapping of claims to sources that actually support them**
General content rewriting differs from Speak Human TW language review; do not automatically apply its review documents without an explicit trigger
## Required inputs
Provide: the full article, reader questions, sources, and actual experience or evidence
## Method steps
1. For important judgments, prioritize official documentation, research reports, papers, books, news, expert interviews, government data, or platform announcements
2. Citations must directly support the core judgment; do not merely append a list of sources to the article
3. Start by checking whether each article has at least 1–3 genuinely relevant sources; the goal is support for claims, not a source count
## Calculation and interpretation
Check only presence and clarity; do not invent experts, experience, or data, or guarantee AI citations
## Required output fields
| Order | Field | How to fill it in |
|---:|---|---|
| 1 | Subject / location | Original evidence, intermediate method results, or an explicit unknown; do not fabricate |
| 2 | Conditions for use | Original evidence, intermediate method results, or an explicit unknown; do not fabricate |
| 3 | Actual evidence | Original evidence, intermediate method results, or an explicit unknown; do not fabricate |
| 4 | Check status | Original evidence, intermediate method results, or an explicit unknown; do not fabricate |
| 5 | Differences / possible causes | Original evidence, intermediate method results, or an explicit unknown; do not fabricate |
| 6 | Next task | Original evidence, intermediate method results, or an explicit unknown; do not fabricate |
| 7 | Limitations | Original evidence, intermediate method results, or an explicit unknown; do not fabricate |
## Validation cases
**MK-334-C05|Data meets the existing conditions**
Expected: Report that it is usable or should be maintained; do not invent a need for changes
**MK-334-C06|Tool returns an error**
Expected: Report that the data was not obtained; do not classify it as a business anomaly
## Method sources
Original file: SEO104_AI可引用文章檢查表
Source locator: checks
Source basis: extracted from course materials
Original URL: https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1hmaWbUWe-BsaRUVA9IpGrLUt7wQ8wdIVHe4W_Sg4uP4/edit
English translation of source excerpt retained in the master sheet:
> The task of 104: check whether an article has the conditions needed for AI citation