Firsthand Experience Check. Use when work requires evidence of experience and gaps that cannot be filled by invention; process the specified inputs using this method and verify the deliverable
Installs into .claude/skills of the current project.
Sponsors
SSkills DirectorySkills Directory
Know which skills are safe — weekly.
SSkills DirectorySkills Directory
Is that skill safe to install?
Are you the author of Mk 332?
Add the live security badge to your README. It updates with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/backtrue-mk-332)
---
name: mk-332
description: "Firsthand Experience Check. Use when work requires evidence of experience and gaps that cannot be filled by invention; process the specified inputs using this method and verify the deliverable"
---
# MK-332 | Firsthand Experience Check
For ordinary chat, upload `packs/mk-332.md`, which includes the shared rules, this method, and required references
## Purpose
This skill delivers: **Evidence of experience and gaps that cannot be filled by invention**
General content rewriting differs from Speak Human TW language review; do not automatically apply its review documents without an explicit trigger
## Required inputs
Provide: the full article, reader questions, sources, and actual experience or evidence
## Method steps
1. Check whether the article contains any firsthand material the author / brand has seen, done, tested, served, or observed
2. Firsthand experience is more than a claim of expertise; it may come from customer service, sales, customer reviews, cases, or KOL experiences
3. If the entire article consists of definitions, compilations, and paraphrases, mark firsthand experience as insufficient
## Calculation and interpretation
Check only presence and clarity; do not invent experts, experience, or data, or guarantee AI citations
## Required output fields
| Order | Field | How to fill it in |
|---:|---|---|
| 1 | Subject / location | Original evidence, intermediate method results, or an explicit unknown; do not fabricate |
| 2 | Conditions for use | Original evidence, intermediate method results, or an explicit unknown; do not fabricate |
| 3 | Actual evidence | Original evidence, intermediate method results, or an explicit unknown; do not fabricate |
| 4 | Check status | Original evidence, intermediate method results, or an explicit unknown; do not fabricate |
| 5 | Differences / possible causes | Original evidence, intermediate method results, or an explicit unknown; do not fabricate |
| 6 | Next task | Original evidence, intermediate method results, or an explicit unknown; do not fabricate |
| 7 | Limitations | Original evidence, intermediate method results, or an explicit unknown; do not fabricate |
## Validation cases
**MK-332-C05|Data meets the existing conditions**
Expected: Report that it is usable or should be maintained; do not invent a need for changes
**MK-332-C06|Tool returns an error**
Expected: Report that the data was not obtained; do not classify it as a business anomaly
## Method sources
Original file: SEO104_AI可引用文章檢查表
Source locator: checks
Source basis: extracted from course materials
Original URL: https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1hmaWbUWe-BsaRUVA9IpGrLUt7wQ8wdIVHe4W_Sg4uP4/edit
English translation of source excerpt retained in the master sheet:
> The task of 104: check whether an article has the conditions needed for AI citation