Use website pages and GSC query/page performance to decide whether existing pages should be kept, improved, consolidated, or supplemented with new pages, and plan main entry pages and relevant internal links
Installs into .claude/skills of the current project.
Sponsors
SSkills DirectorySkills Directory
Know which skills are safe — weekly.
SSkills DirectorySkills Directory
Is that skill safe to install?
Are you the author of Mk 312?
Add the live security badge to your README. It updates with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/backtrue-mk-312)
---
name: mk-312
description: "Use website pages and GSC query/page performance to decide whether existing pages should be kept, improved, consolidated, or supplemented with new pages, and plan main entry pages and relevant internal links"
---
# MK-312|Decide Whether to Keep, Improve, or Add Pages
For a regular chat, upload `packs/mk-312.md`; it includes the shared rules, this method, and required references
## Purpose
This Skill delivers: **Recommendations to avoid rework and duplicate pages**
Permission in robots or the existence of a sitemap does not guarantee indexing; do not combine site technical status and content quality into a single conclusion
## Required Inputs
Website or topic and existing URL inventory, readable pages and internal links, target audience and search tasks; available GSC query-by-page data with common property and search type, filters, two equal nonoverlapping periods, and coverage. When GSC data is absent, inspect actual content and intent first and leave performance judgments pending
## Method Steps
1. Follow the complete workflow below to inventory URLs, actual content, and page tasks; when GSC is available, align periods, property, search type, and filters before reviewing page and query-by-page changes
2. Classify each page as retain, improve, consolidation candidate, or add; a shared keyword or traffic decline alone does not justify consolidation, and pages with independent decision or case value retain that distinction
3. Assign a main entry and relevant internal links for each need, specifying source, destination, contextual anchor, and reader’s next action; consolidation candidates also need a destination, unique-content preservation, and pending checks
4. Use the per-page decision table and follow-up observations in the complete workflow; execute actual website changes within that workflow’s authorization scope
## Calculation and Interpretation
Actually crawl/read content and site structure; check current rules and markup, without promising rankings or citations
## Required Output Fields
| Order | Field | How to complete |
|---:|---|---|
| 1 | URL/page job | Use the supplied source, calculation, or explicit unknown |
| 2 | GSC period/query evidence | Use the supplied source, calculation, or explicit unknown |
| 3 | Keep, improve, consolidate or add | Use the supplied source, calculation, or explicit unknown |
| 4 | Decision evidence | Use the supplied source, calculation, or explicit unknown |
| 5 | Consolidation/new destination | Use the supplied source, calculation, or explicit unknown |
| 6 | Internal links/routing | Use the supplied source, calculation, or explicit unknown |
| 7 | Follow-up metrics | Use the supplied source, calculation, or explicit unknown |
| 8 | Gaps/revision conditions | Use the supplied source, calculation, or explicit unknown |
## MK-312 Supplement: Main Entry Pages, GSC Performance, and Consolidation Decisions
This supplement extends existing-page decisions to topic-cluster organization; it is not a new quotation from the original course. When the user specifies a topic or treatment, inventory its existing URLs by reading the sitemap first, then cross-checking actual pages, internal links, and available GSC page/query data. Use the sitemap to discover URLs; it is not a complete site inventory or proof of indexing status
For GSC comparisons, hold the property, search type, filters, and equal-length nonoverlapping periods constant. First use the page dimension to find pages with rising/falling impressions or clicks, then inspect page × query data for candidate pages to understand the demand each serves. Record periods, dimensions, filters, row completeness, and tool limitations. If only some rows are returned, limits are insufficient, or data is unavailable, mark the inventory partial; missing rows are not zero. Differences between periods are observations and do not alone prove that page content or internal links caused the change
For each page, verify actual content, primary task, search intent, case/clinical evidence, service information, and current inbound/outbound pages. Separate different needs within a topic by their main destination URLs; general explanations, cost assessment, cases, and booking can use different pages. Sharing a keyword or declining impressions alone does not establish duplication or a need to consolidate
Classify each page as keep, improve, consolidation candidate, or add. List consolidation candidates only when search intent and core answers substantially overlap, one page can fully serve the need, and source pages have no cases or professional information requiring independent preservation. For each candidate, list the recommended destination URL, source pages, unique content to retain, canonical/redirect decisions to confirm, and internal links to update. Do not directly recommend deleting or redirecting pages before checking their URLs and content. Keep separate pages with clear roles when distinct treatment contexts or decision questions still have independent value
When internal link planning is needed, use the internal-link planning method to add a link map: source URL, target URL, link context, anchor text describing the next page's task, and the reader's next step. Link only when the destination continues the current need; do not interlink the whole site or promise that links themselves increase rankings or traffic
Deliver a decision table with one row per page, including at least URL, page role/intent, GSC comparison periods and page×query differences, keep/improve/consolidate/add decision, supporting evidence and unknowns, consolidation destination or improvement direction, recommended internal links, and follow-up metrics. Website editing, merging, canonical changes, or redirects still require separate explicit authorization before execution
## Verification Cases
**MK-312-A1 | Two pages cover the same treatment: one explains the process and one provides cases under different conditions**
Expected: Read the pages and search tasks; when cases answer a distinct decision, retain their roles and relevant links instead of consolidating solely because of a shared keyword
**MK-312-A2 | GSC exports only some query rows and a page is absent**
Expected: Record the coverage gap; absence does not mean zero traffic; continue content inventory while leaving that page’s performance conclusion pending
## Method Sources
Original file: SEO 102-全站意圖佈局:從搜尋意圖到關鍵節點頁策略
Source location: Pages
Source basis: Derived from course material
Original URL: https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1-Axcm6vxQIgjymV4Jv0X8x0mO_SGp3_0gVAZ1KI_ILk/edit
English translation of source excerpt retained in the master table:
> Different pages address different search needs