Skip to content
Back to skills

Mk 081

ASecurity

Selecting high-margin products. Use when the task requires products with a profit-generating role and their cost constraints. Apply this method to the specified inputs and verify the deliverable

  • 259 stars
  • 0 votes
  • 0 copies
  • 3 views
  • Added October 23, 2026
ai-agentsgo

Security analysis

A100/100

Pro scans all 3 files and shows the line behind each finding

Scanned October 23, 2026

npx -y skills add backtrue/thinkwithblack-skill --skill mk-081 --agent claude-code

Installs into .claude/skills of the current project.

Are you the author of Mk 081?

Add the live security badge to your README. It updates with every re-scan.

Security grade badge for Mk 081
[![Security: A — Skills Directory](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/api/skills/backtrue-mk-081/badge)](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/backtrue-mk-081)

More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page. Keep it an A: scan every change in CI with Pro.

Download with Pro
SKILL.md
---
name: mk-081
description: "Selecting high-margin products. Use when the task requires products with a profit-generating role and their cost constraints. Apply this method to the specified inputs and verify the deliverable"
---

# MK-081 | Selecting high-margin products

For a regular chat, upload `packs/mk-081.md`. It includes the shared rules, this method, and required references

## Purpose

This skill delivers: **Products with a profit-generating role and their cost constraints**

Products occurring in the same transaction do not establish psychological motives; a product pairing does not automatically prove cross-selling effectiveness

## Required inputs


Available raw records: product net prices, variable costs, refunds, stock, customer needs, and supported sales-volume scenarios

## Method Steps

1. List net price, actual product and variable fulfillment costs, refunds, stock, and the existing buyer group with a matching need. High price or margin percentage alone does not identify the lead product
2. A real next-purchase need and contribution meeting the objective support a margin-product candidate. High margin without demand records calls for a capped demand test, not promotion to every member
3. Compare supported volume scenarios × contribution per order − added promotion costs within one period and fulfillment capacity. A higher percentage does not take priority over higher achievable total contribution
4. Deduct contribution displaced from existing full-price sales. If a cost is missing, report partial contribution and break-even conditions, requesting the cost that could reverse ranking rather than treating it as zero
5. Withdraw the lead recommendation when the next need does not fit, refunds increase, or volume assumptions fail. Reconsider after improved costs only if demand still exists

## Calculation and Interpretation

Contribution per order = net paid revenue − product cost − variable fulfillment/payment costs. Total scenario contribution also deducts added promotion and displaced baseline contribution; do not deduct discounts twice

Check example (hypothetical): A contributes 500 per order with support for two orders; B contributes 200 with support for ten. With equal other costs, B's 2,000 exceeds A's 1,000. B falling to three available orders changes priority to A

Decision rules authored by ThinkWithBlack, 2026-10-14; original course sources remain below

## Required output fields

| Order | Field | How to complete |
|---:|---|---|
| 1 | Product/role | Use source evidence, an intermediate method result, or an explicit unknown; do not invent information |
| 2 | Need clues | Use source evidence, an intermediate method result, or an explicit unknown; do not invent information |
| 3 | Sales and gross margin | Use source evidence, an intermediate method result, or an explicit unknown; do not invent information |
| 4 | Pairing or follow-on relationship | Use source evidence, an intermediate method result, or an explicit unknown; do not invent information |
| 5 | Supply constraints | Use source evidence, an intermediate method result, or an explicit unknown; do not invent information |
| 6 | Candidate approach | Use source evidence, an intermediate method result, or an explicit unknown; do not invent information |
| 7 | Reason | Use source evidence, an intermediate method result, or an explicit unknown; do not invent information |

## Method sources

Source file: 營業額提升主要關鍵(一)縱深橫寬產品/產品線企劃策略

Location: Product

Source basis: extracted from course materials

Source URL: https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1lIddPByRFVZeT-TR3CSaL_lEKkpJRloL6JQBLg1fO50/edit

English translation of source excerpt:

> Product/product-line planning for depth and breadth

Files in this skill

  • SKILL.md3.7 KB
  • assets/check-context.py14.6 KB
  • assets/context-contract.json10.1 KB

Attribution

Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.

View all in ai-agents →

Comments

Loading comments…

Newsletter

Get the weekly list of safe new skills, and the ones we pulled.