Skip to content
Back to skills

Plannotator Review

ASecurity

Open Plannotator's browser-based code review UI for the current worktree, another directory, or a pull request URL, then act on the feedback that comes back.

  • 9,168 stars
  • 0 votes
  • 0 copies
  • 3 views
  • Added September 2, 2026
ai-agentsbashgit

Works with

  • claude code

Security analysis

A100/100

Scanned October 1, 2026

npx -y skills add backnotprop/plannotator --skill plannotator-review --agent claude-code

Installs into .claude/skills of the current project.

Are you the author of Plannotator Review?

Add the live security badge to your README. It updates with every re-scan.

Security grade badge for Plannotator Review
[![Security: A — Skills Directory](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/api/skills/backnotprop-plannotator-review-297fe85a/badge)](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/backnotprop-plannotator-review-297fe85a)

More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page. Keep it an A: scan every change in CI with Pro.

Download with Pro
SKILL.md
---
name: plannotator-review
description: Open Plannotator's browser-based code review UI for the current worktree, another directory, or a pull request URL, then act on the feedback that comes back.
allowed-tools: Bash(plannotator:*)
disable-model-invocation: true
---

# Plannotator Review

Arguments pass through to `plannotator review`: one directory or PR/MR URL, `--git` / `--gitbutler`, and the session-only open-state flags `--base <ref>` / `--diff-type <type>` (git-only; for a stacked branch, `--base <the branch below yours>` reviews just that layer).

For another repository or worktree, pass its path relative to this session or an absolute path, e.g. `/plannotator-review ../feature-worktree`. Quote paths containing spaces. Supply a target, not prose; feedback names the directory where changes belong.

## Code review feedback

!`plannotator review $ARGUMENTS`

## Your task

If the review above contains feedback or annotations, address them in the same conversation. If no changes were requested (an approval/LGTM-style result), acknowledge that review passed and continue.

If the review was moved to the background, wait for it to finish. If Claude Code stopped it at its background time limit before the user decided, tell the user, and only when they ask, run `plannotator review $ARGUMENTS` again with `run_in_background` and `timeout: 7200000`: their annotations are restored from the saved draft.

Attribution

Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.

Comments

Loading comments…

Newsletter

Get the weekly list of safe new skills, and the ones we pulled.