Validate hunt conclusions against receipts, contradictory evidence, and success criteria
Scanned 5/28/2026
Install via CLI
openskills install backbay-labs/thrunt-god---
name: hunt-validate-findings
description: Validate hunt conclusions against receipts, contradictory evidence, and success criteria
argument-hint: "[phase]"
allowed-tools: Read, Bash, Write, AskUserQuestion
---
<objective>
Validate the current hunt's findings.
`FINDINGS.md` and `EVIDENCE_REVIEW.md` remain the source of truth for validation.
**Creates or updates:**
- `.planning/FINDINGS.md`
- `.planning/EVIDENCE_REVIEW.md`
- `.planning/STATE.md`
**After this command:** Run `/hunt-publish`.
</objective>
<execution_context>
@.github/thrunt-god/workflows/hunt-validate-findings.md
@.github/thrunt-god/templates/findings.md
@.github/thrunt-god/templates/evidence-review.md
</execution_context>
<process>
Execute the validation workflow from @.github/thrunt-god/workflows/hunt-validate-findings.md.
Mark each hypothesis as supported, disproven, or inconclusive. Call out evidence gaps explicitly.
</process>
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!
Adversarial multi-agent planning skill. Self-orchestrates 5 hostile category members (unspecified-low, unspecified-high, deep, ultrabrain, artistry) via team-mode for ruthless cross-critique debate, distills only the defensible insights, then MANDATORILY hands the distilled insight bundle to the `plan` agent for executable plan formalization. Use when planning needs maximum rigor and surfacing of weak assumptions, blind spots, and over-engineering. Triggers: 'hyperplan', 'hpp', '/hyperplan', ...