destination-trip-planning — Research a specific destination/attraction, gather pricing/logistics, and build a themed trip itinerary tailored to the traveler's profile.
Scanned 9/11/2026
Install to Claude Code
npx -y skills add AtlasOmnia/hermes-custom-pack --skill destination-trip-planning --agent claude-codeInstalls into .claude/skills of the current project.
Are you the author of Destination Trip Planning?
Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/atlasomnia-destination-trip-planning)More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page.
---
name: destination-trip-planning
description: destination-trip-planning — Research a specific destination/attraction, gather pricing/logistics, and build a themed trip itinerary tailored to the traveler's profile.
version: 1.0.0
license: MIT
platforms:
- linux
- macos
- windows
metadata:
hermes:
tags:
- travel
- itinerary
- research
- attractions
- trip-planning
category: productivity
requires_toolsets:
- web
- browser
---
# Destination Trip Planning
Plan themed trips to specific attractions or destinations with real pricing, logistics, and a tight itinerary focused on the theme — not a generic city guide.
## When to Use
- User wants to plan a trip to a specific attraction, event, or themed destination (e.g., Graceland, a national park, a festival, a resort)
- User asks for "what to do there" at a given destination
- User needs a go/no-go recommendation on trip length and budget
- User wants to know what's nearby that fits the same theme
## Core Workflow
### Phase 1: Lock the Destination and Constraints
Clarify up front:
- **Exact destination** — confirm the city/location (Graceland = Memphis, not Nashville)
- **Traveler profile** — age, mobility, energy level, interests
- **Time window** — exact check-in and checkout dates, calendar days, and number of nights; if the user corrects the duration, recompute the entire budget
- **Traveler and payment structure** — total headcount, ages, likely activity participants, and which person/team pays which share
- **Budget sense** — looking for deals vs. full-service package
- **2–3 day trip** vs longer
### Phase 1.5: Clarify What "The Attraction" Actually Is
First-time visitors often don't know the attraction's layout. Preempt "is it just a house?" or "the house is the museum, right?" moments by describing the physical campus up front:
- Is the attraction one building or a campus spread across multiple sites?
- What's the ticket actually cover? (e.g., Graceland's $85 Elvis Experience = mansion across the street + 200K sq ft exhibit complex + two airplanes + on-site dining/shopping)
- Are there free areas (gravesite, gates, grounds)?
- Can the traveler see everything without re-entering or is it split across days?
This matters more for older travelers — they need to know if there's significant walking, shuttles, or stairs between components.
### Phase 2: Gather Destination Research
For the **primary attraction**:
- Ticket pricing tiers (standard vs VIP vs all-access)
- How long the full experience takes
- Peak vs off-peak times
- Available discounts (senior, AAA, military, promo codes)
- Parking / shuttle / accessibility info
For **on-site hotel** (if applicable):
- Lead with the **official property name first** when the user asks for "the [attraction] hotel" (for Graceland: **The Guest House at Graceland**)
- **Separate the hotel from the attraction clearly:** answer whether the hotel is **required** or merely **part of the fuller themed experience**. State this explicitly when the user asks some version of "do we have to stay there?"
- Room rates and resort fees
- Package deals bundling tickets + hotel
- Current promos (seasonal savings, flash sales)
- Proximity to the attraction (walkable?)
- Amenities for an easy stay (no need to leave)
- If exact stay-date pricing is not directly retrievable, give the **best grounded public price signal** you can find, label it as approximate, and do **not** imply it is a verified date-specific rate
- When useful, frame the decision as **experience vs cost efficiency**: themed on-site stay vs cheaper off-site hotel vs attraction-only day trip
For **travel logistics**:
- Distance from user's home city → drive vs fly
- Drive time with realistic traffic
- Nearest airport and transit from airport to attraction
- If driving: split the trip with overnight stops
### Phase 3: Build the Themed Itinerary
**CRITICAL RULE: When the trip has a theme, every suggestion must serve the theme.**
When the user asks "what would she do there" or "anything else related":
- List ONLY attractions, restaurants, and activities related to the theme
- Do NOT mix in generic city recommendations (parks, unrelated museums, shopping districts, tourist attractions)
- If you're not sure, ask "is she also interested in [city] stuff, or just [theme]?"
- Label each recommendation with its thematic connection (e.g., "where Elvis recorded his first song")
For each recommendation, give:
- What it is and why it matters
- How long it takes
- Distance from the hotel / attraction hub
- Walkability for an older traveler
### Phase 4: Present the Itinerary
Structure by day:
1. **Day 1** — Arrive, settle in, easy evening
2. **Day 2** — Main attraction day (full, relaxed pace)
3. **Day 3** — Morning theme-option + depart
No "must see everything" pressure. For older travelers, prioritize:
- Short distances between stops
- Seating available
- Minimal walking / stairs
- Easy Uber or shuttle access
- Afternoon rest time
### Output Style
- Lead with "here's what she'd actually do" — concrete, not conceptual
- Use tables for pricing comparisons
- Use bullet lists for attraction lineups
- Clearly separate the primary attraction from optional extras
- Before moving from research to pricing, confirm the itinerary with the user
- For unstable group decisions, do not wait for perfect commitment before helping: present a provisional primary-trip budget plus a clearly separated fallback for the smaller subgroup, with assumptions, optional activity add-ons, and the decision deadline that matters for peak inventory
- When the party includes older travelers or children, favor resort-accessible lodging and simple transport over an isolated property, even if the isolated cabin appears cheaper
## Pitfalls
- **Do not assume the destination city is the attraction city.** Graceland = Memphis, not Nashville. Confirm geography early.
- **Do not suggest generic city attractions on a themed trip.** When someone asks for Elvis stuff, give them Elvis stuff — not Beale Street blues clubs or the Civil Rights Museum unless they ask.
- **Travel/attraction websites frequently block web_extract and even browser_navigate.** They use Cloudflare or JS-heavy rendering. Fallback chain: search-result snippets → press releases on the official site → third-party aggregator articles. For JS-heavy blog-type sites that web_extract times out on, try `curl -sL -H "User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 ..." <url>` to pull raw HTML — the content is often inline despite the SPA shell. Do not keep retrying web_extract, and don't re-navigate a Cloudflare-blocked page.
- **Do not overbuild.** A 70-year-old who wants to see Elvis doesn't need a 12-stop scavenger hunt. 2-3 meaningful things plus Graceland is plenty.
- **Duration and payer drift.** When the user changes a trip from one number of days/nights to another, recompute flights, lodging, meals, transport, activities, and all subgroup totals. When teams pay separately, do not report only a combined household total.
- **Airport handoff pattern:** When you suggest an airport and the user asks about a different one, research it quickly and neutrally — don't argue for your original suggestion. After reporting the data (connecting, more expensive), the user may pick the regional option anyway — accept without re-explaining the comparison.
- **Confirm each phase before proceeding.** User wants to confirm: research findings → itinerary → day count → themed extras → THEN pricing. When they reply with a short affirmative like "y" or "k," that's their signal to move to the next phase. Do not jump ahead.
- **Do not bury the practical info under blog-style prose.** Give ticket prices, hours, and how-to-book in the first pass.
- **When the user asks "anything else [theme]-related?" do NOT re-list what you already told them.** Give new specific themed options only. If you already covered them all, say so and offer a themed restaurant, historic site, or offbeat spot — not generic city stuff unless they explicitly ask for it.
- **Do not assume the user knows what the ticket price includes.** When presenting pricing, add one clear line about what each tier actually covers (e.g., "$85 standard ticket = mansion tour + exhibit complex + airplanes, ~3.5-4 hrs"). This prevents the "the house is the museum right?" confusion.
## Verification
Before presenting:
- Primary attraction pricing confirmed from at least one source
- Hotel package deal checked against bundle vs separate pricing
- Themed attractions only — no generic city filler
- Realistic pace for the traveler's profile
## Total Trip Estimate
After pricing is finalized, deliver a **one-table budget estimate**:
| Category | Estimated Cost |
|----------|:-------------:|
| ✈️ Flights (round trip) | $xxx |
| 🏨 Hotel (N nights) | $xxx |
| 🎫 Attraction tickets | $xxx |
| 🚕 Local transport (Uber/shuttle) | $xxx |
| 🍔 Meals (N days) | $xxx |
| **Total (approx)** | **~$xxx** |
- Use real fares and rates where available, rounded estimates where not
- For groups paying separately, show per-person cost and each paying subgroup/team total, with an explicit split rule for shared lodging and transportation
- State the exact dates and nights in the budget heading; do not reuse an earlier duration after the user corrects it
- Label which numbers are verified vs. estimates
- Include a suggested date range (midweek preferred, event dates to avoid)
Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!