Rules Eval

---
name: rules-eval
description: 'Evaluate Claude Code rules in .claude/rules/. Use for frontmatter, globs, and quality audits.'
alwaysApply: false
category: rule-management
tags:
- evaluation
- rules
- validation
- quality-assurance
- glob-patterns
- frontmatter
dependencies:
- skills-eval
provides:
  infrastructure:
  - rules-evaluation
  - frontmatter-validation
  - glob-pattern-analysis
  patterns:
  - rule-auditing
  - content-quality
  - organization-analysis
estimated_tokens: 400
evaluation_criteria:
  frontmatter_validity: 25
  glob_pattern_quality: 20
  content_quality: 25
  organization: 15
  token_efficiency: 15
model_hint: standard
role: entrypoint
---
# Rules Evaluation Framework

## When NOT To Use

- Evaluating skills (use `abstract:skills-eval`)
- Evaluating hooks (use `abstract:hooks-eval`)
- Writing a new rule (use `hookify:writing-rules`)

## Overview

This skill evaluates Claude Code rules in `.claude/rules/` directories against quality standards. It validates YAML frontmatter, glob pattern syntax, content quality, and directory organization. Rules files support path-scoped conditional loading via `paths` frontmatter and unconditional rules (no `paths` field).

Key validations: YAML syntax errors, unquoted glob patterns, Cursor-specific fields (`alwaysApply`, `globs`), overly broad patterns, content verbosity, and naming conventions.

## Quick Start

```bash
# Evaluate rules in current project
/rules-eval

# Evaluate specific directory
/rules-eval .claude/rules/

# Detailed analysis with recommendations
/rules-eval --detailed
```

## Evaluation Workflow

1. Scan `.claude/rules/` for all `.md` files (including subdirectories)
2. Validate YAML frontmatter syntax and fields
3. Analyze glob patterns for correctness and specificity
4. Assess content quality (actionable, concise, non-conflicting)
5. Check organization (naming, structure, symlinks)
6. Measure token efficiency and redundancy

## Scoring

| Category | Points | Focus |
|----------|--------|-------|
| Frontmatter Validity | 25 | YAML syntax, required fields, correct field names |
| Glob Pattern Quality | 20 | Syntax, specificity, quoting |
| Content Quality | 25 | Actionable, concise, non-conflicting |
| Organization | 15 | Naming, structure, symlink usage |
| Token Efficiency | 15 | Rule size, redundancy detection |

| Score | Level |
|-------|-------|
| 91-100 | Excellent - Production-ready |
| 76-90 | Good - Minor improvements possible |
| 51-75 | Basic - Needs optimization |
| 26-50 | Below Standards - Significant issues |
| 0-25 | Critical - Invalid or broken rules |

## Resources

### Skill-Specific Modules
- **Frontmatter Validation**: See `modules/frontmatter-validation.md`
- **Glob Pattern Analysis**: See `modules/glob-pattern-analysis.md`
- **Content Quality Metrics**: See `modules/content-quality-metrics.md`
- **Organization Patterns**: See `modules/organization-patterns.md`

### Tools
- **Rules Validator**: `scripts/rules_validator.py`

### Related Skills
- `abstract:skills-eval` - Skill evaluation framework
- `abstract:hooks-eval` - Hook evaluation framework

## Exit Criteria

- [ ] Every `.md` file under `.claude/rules/` (including subdirectories) receives a quality score
  (0-100) with per-category breakdown across the five dimensions.
- [ ] YAML frontmatter syntax errors and unquoted glob patterns are listed as blocking findings
  before any score is reported.
- [ ] Rules using Cursor-specific fields (`alwaysApply`, `globs`) are flagged as
  non-compliant with the expected Claude Code schema.
- [ ] Any rule scoring below 26 (Critical tier) is reported with at least one concrete
  corrective action, not just a score.