Classify, gate, and review changes. Use when landing a PR, releasing, or amending rules. Do not use for failure triage; use night-market-debugging-playbook.
Scanned 9/2/2026
Install to Claude Code
npx -y skills add athola/claude-night-market --skill night-market-change-control --agent claude-codeInstalls into .claude/skills of the current project.
Are you the author of Night Market Change Control?
Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/athola-night-market-change-control)More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page.
---
name: night-market-change-control
description: 'Classify, gate, and review changes. Use when landing a PR, releasing, or amending rules. Do not use for failure triage; use night-market-debugging-playbook.'
---
# Night Market Change Control
Every change to this repo passes through a fixed law stack, a
classification step, and a gauntlet of automated gates. This skill tells
you which class your change is, which gates it must pass, and which
rules are non-negotiable because a past incident made them so. Nothing
here may be routed around: if a gate fails, fix the cause, never the
gate.
Jargon used below: a "gate" is any automated check that can block a
commit, PR, or release. An "ADR" is an Architecture Decision Record in
`docs/adr/`. The "Iron Law" is constitution rule 3: no implementation
without a failing test first.
## The law stack
When two documents conflict, the higher one wins.
| Rank | Source | Contents |
|------|--------|----------|
| 1 | `CONSTITUTION.md` | 10 immutable rules, override and amendment process |
| 2 | `.claude/rules/` | 8 project rules (markdown style, read budgets, slop gates, invariants) |
| 3 | `docs/adr/` | 17 numbered decision records (0001 to 0017) |
| 4 | Guides in `docs/` | quality-gates, testing-guide, plugin-development-guide |
A skill, hook, or agent instruction that says "skip rule N" without an
explicit user grant or a merged amendment is itself a defect
(CONSTITUTION.md, Override mechanism section).
## The ten constitution rules
One line each. Where a rule was written in blood, the incident column
names the blood.
| # | Rule | Motivating incident |
|---|------|---------------------|
| 1 | Disclose AI involvement in every PR; never strip real or add fake AI attribution | Enforced by hook `plugins/imbue/hooks/vow_no_ai_attribution.py` |
| 2 | AI commits over 200 changed lines need a spec, ADR, or plan doc first (lockfiles, fixtures, snapshots excluded) | Size = scrutiny principle; see the unbloat incident under non-negotiables |
| 3 | Iron Law TDD: failing test before implementation for plugin Python. Skills and prose need structural tests (`test_skill_<name>.py`) | Design principle, no single incident |
| 4 | One identity leak ("As a large language model") in any committed artifact is an automatic revert | Pattern catalog in scribe slop-detector |
| 5 | Quality claims ("fast", "production-ready") need in-repo evidence or deletion | Design principle |
| 6 | No bypassing gates: no `--no-verify`, no `SKIP=hook`, no unauthorized force push, no bare suppression comments without a stated reason | Neutered-mypy incident (CHANGELOG 1.9.12); bulk-ignore revert `06b9b1db` |
| 7 | New dependencies need justification; 18 months unmaintained is presumed abandoned; verify AI-suggested package names against the registry | Slopsquatting defense; hook `guard_package_hallucination.py` (imbue) |
| 8 | Docs cost reader-time (audience x frequency x per-read time); writing effort must match | Design principle |
| 9 | Prefer deletion over rewriting; AI slop is overwhelmingly additive | Design principle |
| 10 | Errors are not optional: propagate by default, no bare except, safe-to-discard needs an inline "why" comment | Silent-failure sweep `666171c3`; ecosystem bare-except campaign |
## Change classification
Classify before the first commit. The class decides the paperwork.
| Change | Required process |
|--------|------------------|
| AI-generated diff, 200 changed lines or fewer | Plain PR through the standard gates |
| AI-generated diff over 200 changed lines | Spec, ADR, or planning doc BEFORE the code (rule 2) |
| Load-bearing design decision | Numbered ADR in `docs/adr/` (next number after 0017) |
| New project-wide rule | New file in `.claude/rules/` via plain PR; existing rules cite an origin issue or discussion (#454, #457) |
| Constitution amendment | PR titled `constitution: amend rule N`, a summary of what changes and why, sign-off from the repo owner |
| Release | Version bump, changelog section, v-prefixed tag (lifecycle below) |
## The change lifecycle
### 1. Branch
Branch from `master` (the main branch) using `<topic>-<version>`:
```bash
git checkout master && git pull
git checkout -b my-topic-1.9.16
```
Live examples in `git branch -a`: `ai-slop-1.9.4`, `bugfixes-1.9.5`,
`discussions-fix-1.9.14`. Never delete `backup/unbloat-*` branches.
They are the recovery points for past deletion campaigns
(`backup/unbloat-20260328` is how the 2026-03-28 over-deletion was
undone).
### 2. Local gates before committing
```bash
make lint # ruff format + ruff check --fix + bandit
make typecheck # per-plugin strict mypy (all plugins)
make test # per-plugin pytest via scripts/run-plugin-tests.sh
make validate-all # plugin structure validation
```
Plugin tests MUST run per plugin (`make <plugin>-test` or
`make -C plugins/<plugin> test`). Root pytest excludes `plugins/*` to
avoid import-path collisions.
### 3. The pre-commit gauntlet
`git commit` runs `.pre-commit-config.yaml` hooks in this order
(verified 2026-07-02):
1. Suppression guards: `check-noqa` (blocks bare inline lint
suppressions), `check-docstring-quality`, `check-json-utils-drift`,
`check-per-file-ignores`.
2. Hook registration: `check-hook-registrations`,
`check-plugin-hooks`.
3. Code gates: `run-plugin-typecheck --all` (strict mypy on every
plugin, not just changed ones), `run-plugin-tests --changed`.
4. Skill and plugin validation: `validate-skill-descriptions`, one
`validate-<plugin>-plugin` hook per plugin,
`check-context-optimization`, `validate-description-budget`,
`check-markdown-links`, `capabilities-sync-check`,
`check-skill-graph-drift`, `check-skill-exit-criteria-drift`.
5. Standard file hygiene (trailing whitespace, YAML/TOML/JSON syntax,
merge conflicts, debug statements).
6. `bandit` security scan.
7. `ruff-format`, `ruff-fix`, `ruff-check`.
8. Pin freshness: `check-ruff-version`, `check-pinned-versions`.
The typecheck gate runs `--all` deliberately. It used to run
`--changed`, and a global mirrors-mypy hook silently disabled 13 error
codes. Both were fixed in 1.9.12 (CHANGELOG). Do not weaken either
setting.
### 4. PR flow
Run in this order (all are sanctum slash commands):
1. `/sanctum:prepare-pr` updates docs, runs tests, drafts the PR.
2. `/sanctum:pr-review` reviews scope, requirements, and code.
3. `/sanctum:validate-pr` builds and executes a diff-derived test
plan, and proves revert-tests are genuine guards.
4. `/sanctum:fix-pr` and `/sanctum:resolve-threads` handle feedback.
For plugin-touching changes, add `abstract:plugin-review` at the
matching tier:
| Tier | When | Scope | Time |
|------|------|-------|------|
| branch | Default during work | Affected and related plugins | ~2 min |
| pr | Before merge | Affected and related plugins | ~5 min |
| release | Before version bump | Every plugin | ~15 min |
### 5. Release
1. Bump the ecosystem version. `.claude-plugin/marketplace.json` is
the source of truth; the bumper fans it out to every plugin's
`plugin.json`, `metadata.json`, `openpackage.yml`, `pyproject.toml`,
and `__init__.py`:
```bash
python3 plugins/sanctum/scripts/update_versions.py 1.9.16
```
Or use the `sanctum:version-updates` skill, which runs a
`git-workspace-review` preflight first.
2. Move `[Unreleased]` entries in `CHANGELOG.md` into a dated version
section (Keep a Changelog 1.1.0, SemVer). Never rewrite or de-slop
historical entries.
3. Update the docs of record: `docs/api-overview.md` version
reference, plugin READMEs, and the generated capabilities reference
via `/sanctum:sync-capabilities`.
4. Run `abstract:plugin-review --tier release`.
5. `/sanctum:create-tag` pushes a v-prefixed tag. The tag matching
`v*` triggers `.github/workflows/cross-framework-publish.yml`
(semver validation, cross-framework build, tarballs, GitHub
release). Pushes to `master` separately trigger
`trust-attestation.yml` (full test run plus SLSA attestation).
## Landing a change: checklist
| Step | Action | Gate satisfied |
|------|--------|----------------|
| Classify | Match the change against the classification table | Rule 2, amendment process |
| Branch | `<topic>-<version>` off master | Convention |
| Test first | Failing test before implementation | Rule 3 (Iron Law) |
| Local gates | `make lint && make typecheck && make test` | Rule 6 |
| Commit | Plain commit, no bypass flags, honest attribution | Rules 1 and 6 |
| PR | prepare-pr, pr-review, validate-pr; disclose AI involvement | Rule 1 |
| Plugin review | `abstract:plugin-review` at branch or pr tier | Plugin quality |
| Merge | All CI checks green, review threads resolved | CI |
## Non-negotiables
Each row is a settled battle. Re-litigating one requires new evidence
stronger than the incident that settled it.
| Non-negotiable | Rationale | Incident | Evidence |
|----------------|-----------|----------|----------|
| Never bypass or weaken a gate | A green gate that skips checks is worse than no gate: it certifies broken code | mirrors-mypy silently disabled 13 error codes; typecheck ran changed-only; bulk ruff ignores hid 73 real violations | CHANGELOG 1.9.12; commit `06b9b1db` |
| No swallowed errors, ever | catch-and-continue in a scanner drops findings silently and reports clean | Scanners B1-B4 returned clean results on malformed input for months | commit `666171c3` (PR #521, issue #575) |
| Deletion campaigns need a backup branch and a markdown-reference scan | Python import graphs miss scripts referenced only from skills and commands | Tier-3 unbloat deleted 182 files (66K lines); skill-referenced scripts had to be restored | commits `a3f11323` (delete), `3f280334` (restore); branch `backup/unbloat-20260328` |
| No DRY consolidation across plugin boundaries | Plugins are independent deployables, and shared code couples their release cycles | tasks_manager consolidated to a shared script, reverted, then differentiated per plugin | commits `054e2679`, `29961cd2`, `d89a55c7` |
| No speculative infrastructure | Unused abstraction is pure carrying cost | LSP proxy landed without a consumer and was reverted in PR #193 review | commit `bc318947` |
| Identity leaks are an automatic revert | One leaked phrase proves unreviewed AI text shipped | Constitution rule 4 | `CONSTITUTION.md` |
| Historical CHANGELOG entries are never edited | The changelog is a record, not prose to polish | Codified as an anti-goal in the slop rules | `.claude/rules/slop-scan-for-docs.md` (anti-goals) |
## When NOT to use
- A gate is failing and you need to diagnose why: use
`night-market-debugging-playbook`.
- You want the full story behind an incident named above: use
`night-market-failure-archaeology`.
- You need the mechanics of running tests, lint, or the release
scripts (flags, artifacts, environments): use
`night-market-operations`.
- You are judging whether a design fits the architecture: use
`night-market-architecture-contract`.
- You are deciding what evidence a test must provide: use
`night-market-validation-and-qa`.
## Exit Criteria
- [ ] The change is classified against the classification table, and
any over-200-line AI diff has a spec, ADR, or plan doc committed
before the implementation.
- [ ] `make lint`, `make typecheck`, and `make test` pass locally, and
no bypass flag (`--no-verify`, `SKIP=`, force push) appears in
the branch history.
- [ ] The branch name matches `<topic>-<version>` and is based on
`master`.
- [ ] The PR description discloses AI involvement (authored,
co-authored, or reviewed).
- [ ] For a release: `marketplace.json`, the dated `CHANGELOG.md`
section, and the pushed `v*` tag all carry the same version.
- [ ] Any constitution change is in a PR titled
`constitution: amend rule N` with repo-owner sign-off.
## Provenance and maintenance
Compiled 2026-07-02 against repo v1.9.15 (10 constitution rules, 8
project rules, 17 ADRs). Re-verify volatile facts before relying on
them:
```bash
rg -c '^### [0-9]' CONSTITUTION.md # expect 10
ls .claude/rules/ | wc -l # expect 8
ls docs/adr/ | wc -l # expect 17
rg -n '"version"' .claude-plugin/marketplace.json | head -1
rg -n ' - id:' .pre-commit-config.yaml # current gate order
rg -n 'v\*' .github/workflows/cross-framework-publish.yml
rg -n 'amend rule' CONSTITUTION.md # amendment title convention
```
Commit hashes cited above were verified with `git log --oneline -1
<hash>` on 2026-07-02. Unverified/candidate: the exact count of files
restored after the unbloat incident (commit subjects confirm the
delete and restore, not the restored-file count), and whether
`docs/api-overview.md` holds a version table or a single version
reference (one version mention verified).
Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!