Assess whether an existing paint system may be stripped from a space-hardware part and what may go back on it. Use when a full strip is proposed rather than a local touch-up: resolve the standing of the stripping method against the substrate as permitted, conditional or prohibited, accumulate the substrate loss this strip adds to what earlier strips already took, compare it with the wall the drawing keeps, count the further strips the part will still carry, land the stripped surface in the ro...
Scanned 9/27/2026
Install to Claude Code
npx -y skills add ashfordeOU/aero-agent-skills --skill q7031-stripping-and-repainting --agent claude-codeInstalls into .claude/skills of the current project.
Are you the author of Q7031 Stripping And Repainting?
Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/ashfordeou-q7031-stripping-and-repainting)More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page.
---
name: q7031-stripping-and-repainting
description: "Assess whether an existing paint system may be stripped from a space-hardware part and what may go back on it. Use when a full strip is proposed rather than a local touch-up: resolve the standing of the stripping method against the substrate as permitted, conditional or prohibited, accumulate the substrate loss this strip adds to what earlier strips already took, compare it with the wall the drawing keeps, count the further strips the part will still carry, land the stripped surface in the roughness window the new primer needs, and test primer, topcoat and substrate for compatibility. Trigger: ecss, q-st-70-31c-painting-scope, paint-stripping-method-substrate-compatibility, coating-strip-cycle-budget, stripped-surface-roughness-window, repaint-primer-topcoat-compatibility, substrate-material-loss-per-strip."
license: Apache-2.0
compliance: STANDARDS-REF
standards:
- id: ecss
reference-only: true
gated: false
domain: space-systems
pack: space-systems
compatibility: "agentskills.io SKILL.md; any SKILL.md host (Claude Code, Hermes, OpenClaw)"
metadata:
domain: space-systems
subdomain: ecss
tags: [ecss, q-st-70-31c-painting-scope, q7031-stripping-and-repainting, paint-stripping-method-substrate-compatibility, coating-strip-cycle-budget, stripped-surface-roughness-window, repaint-primer-topcoat-compatibility, substrate-material-loss-per-strip]
version: 0.1.0
author: Aero Agent Skills
---
# ECSS Painting — Stripping and Re-Painting (space-systems/ecss/q7031-stripping-and-repainting)
Use when the task is the strip-and-repaint rule of ECSS-Q-ST-70-31C: a coating
system is coming off a part rather than being repaired locally, and the
questions are whether the removal method may be pointed at that substrate,
what the part has left after it, and what is allowed to go back on.
## Domain quick reference
- A strip is a hardware operation. Every method removes some substrate or
changes its surface, so the method is chosen against the material, not
against whichever booth is free.
- Method standing comes in three states, and the middle one is the one that
gets lost. Permitted means the qualified procedure covers it; prohibited
means the method attacks the substrate and is refused outright; conditional
means it is usable only under an approved procedure with a witness coupon,
which is not the same as allowed.
- The hazards are material-specific. Alkaline chemistry attacks aluminium and
magnesium. Abrasive blast breaks fibres in a composite laminate long before
it looks damaged. Solvent strippers attack a polymer matrix. Magnesium is
restrictive on nearly every route.
- Substrate loss is cumulative across the life of the part. Each strip takes
its per-cycle loss, earlier strips already took theirs, and the wall the
drawing keeps is the difference between the nominal and the minimum
thickness. A part whose margin is consumed is refused, not stripped
carefully.
- How many further strips the part will carry is a whole number: a part cannot
be stripped a fraction of a time, and a margin landing on a whole number of
cycles is credited with that number rather than losing one to rounding.
- The stripped surface has to land inside a roughness window, not above a
floor. Too smooth and the primer has nothing to key into; too rough and the
film cannot cover the peaks at its specified thickness.
- The system going back on is two compatibilities, not one. The primer has to
bond to that substrate, and the topcoat has to be one that primer will
carry. Either half failing is an incompatible system.
## Workflow
1. Normalize the substrate and the proposed method, then take the method
standing from the pair. Refuse a prohibited method and hold a conditional
one until an approved procedure exists.
2. Accumulate the substrate loss: this strip's cycles times the per-cycle
loss, added to what earlier strips already removed.
3. Compute the wall margin between the stripped part and its minimum
thickness, and raise a consumed margin as a refusal.
4. Count the whole further strip cycles the remaining margin will carry, so
the next rework decision starts from a number.
5. Put the stripped surface roughness against its window, treating both edges
as inside and a missing measurement as an unverified finding.
6. Test the primer against the substrate and the topcoat against the primer,
raising each half independently.
7. Confirm the residual coating was actually removed, then disposition the
job -- approved, refused on a hard incompatibility or a consumed wall, or
conditions outstanding -- and aggregate across the campaign.
## Pitfalls
- Reading conditional as permitted, which is how a composite panel ends up
media-blasted with no approved procedure and no witness coupon behind it.
- Sizing the strip against this event only, so a part on its fourth strip is
assessed as if it were on its first.
- Treating a wall margin of zero as acceptable because nothing has gone below
the minimum yet; the next strip has nowhere to go.
- Chasing a mirror finish after stripping, which takes the surface below the
roughness the primer needs to key into.
- Checking the primer against the substrate and assuming the topcoat follows,
when the primer and topcoat pairing is its own compatibility.
- Calling a part stripped on appearance, with residual film left in fillets
and fastener recesses under the new system.
## Behavior contract (gate 3)
The method standing matrix, cumulative substrate loss, wall margin and whole
remaining strip cycles, roughness window, primer and topcoat compatibility and
the job and campaign dispositions are exercised by the gate 3 contract test:
scripts/test_q7031_stripping_and_repainting.py against
scripts/q7031_stripping_and_repainting_logic.py (stdlib unittest, offline).
Run: python3 scripts/test_q7031_stripping_and_repainting.py
## Compliance
- ECSS standards are freely downloadable (ESA); cite the source and
paraphrase per standards-map.yaml.
- compliance: STANDARDS-REF, gated: false.
Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!