Skills DirectorySkills Directory
SkillsLearnSecurityCategoriesDocsCommunityBlog
Sign InSubmit Skill
Skills Directory

Security-tested agent skills for Claude, coding agents, and AI workflows.

Directory

  • Browse Skills
  • All Skills A–Z
  • Claude Skills
  • Claude Code Skills
  • Agent Skills
  • Categories
  • Authors
  • Submit a Skill

Learn

  • Learn Hub
  • Install Claude Skills
  • Write SKILL.md
  • Skills vs MCP
  • Directories Compared

Security

  • Security
  • Methodology
  • Secure Claude Skills
  • Security Badges

Company

  • About
  • Community
  • Blog
  • API Docs
  • Advertise

2026 Skills Directory. All rights reserved.

ProTermsPrivacyRefunds
Back to skills

Q7021 Acceptance Criteria

ASecurity

Evaluate a flammability screening run against the burn-length and dripping limits the application of the material carries under ECSS-Q-ST-70-21C. Use when a specimen set has been burned and somebody has to say whether the material is screened in for that installation, from a vented equipment bay to a volume the crew occupies. Grades every specimen, counts a value sitting exactly on a limit as compliant through a named tolerance, fails the whole set on one failing specimen, reports a set small...

2 stars
0 votes
0 copies
0 views
Added 9/27/2026
ai-agentspythongo

Works with

claude code

Security Analysis

A100/100

Scanned 9/27/2026

Install to Claude Code

$npx -y skills add ashfordeOU/aero-agent-skills --skill q7021-acceptance-criteria --agent claude-code

Installs into .claude/skills of the current project.

Are you the author of Q7021 Acceptance Criteria?

Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.

Security grade badge for Q7021 Acceptance Criteria
[![Security: A — Skills Directory](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/api/skills/ashfordeou-q7021-acceptance-criteria/badge)](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/ashfordeou-q7021-acceptance-criteria)

More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page.

Download with Pro
Files
SKILL.md
---
name: q7021-acceptance-criteria
description: "Evaluate a flammability screening run against the burn-length and dripping limits the application of the material carries under ECSS-Q-ST-70-21C. Use when a specimen set has been burned and somebody has to say whether the material is screened in for that installation, from a vented equipment bay to a volume the crew occupies. Grades every specimen, counts a value sitting exactly on a limit as compliant through a named tolerance, fails the whole set on one failing specimen, reports a set smaller than the class minimum as inconclusive rather than passing it, and carries the worst-case burn length and its margin. Trigger: ecss, q-st-70-21, flammability-burn-length-limit, flaming-drip-acceptance, flammability-application-class, specimen-set-size-rule, self-extinguishing-criterion, worst-case-burn-length-margin."
license: Apache-2.0
compliance: STANDARDS-REF
standards:
  - id: ecss
    reference-only: true
gated: false
domain: space-systems
pack: space-systems
compatibility: "agentskills.io SKILL.md; any SKILL.md host (Claude Code, Hermes, OpenClaw)"
metadata:
  domain: space-systems
  subdomain: ecss
  tags: [ecss, q-st-70-21-flammability-screening-scope, q7021-acceptance-criteria, flammability-burn-length-limit, flaming-drip-acceptance, flammability-application-class, specimen-set-size-rule, worst-case-burn-length-margin]
  version: 0.1.0
  author: Aero Agent Skills
---

# ECSS Flammability Screening — Acceptance Criteria (space-systems/ecss/q7021-acceptance-criteria)

Use when the task is the acceptance step of the ECSS-Q-ST-70-21C
flammability screening test — deciding whether a burned specimen set
clears the burn length, the dripping behaviour and the after-flame the
material's intended installation allows.

## Domain quick reference

- The limits belong to the installation, not to the material. The same
  tape is comfortably inside the band for a vented equipment bay and
  outside it for a volume the crew occupies, and well outside it where
  the atmosphere is oxygen enriched, so a screening result cannot be
  graded until the destination is named.
- A screening run is a set, not a specimen. Flammability scatters with
  thickness, weave direction and the exact ignition geometry, so one
  clean specimen says very little; the verdict is driven by the worst
  of the set, and one failing specimen fails it.
- A set smaller than the class minimum is inconclusive, and that is a
  different answer from a pass. Reporting two good specimens as a pass
  for a class that needs five turns a sampling shortfall into a
  clearance, and the shortfall is invisible in the verdict afterwards.
- Dripping is a separate hazard from burn length. A short burn that
  sheds flaming material moves the fire somewhere the specimen never
  reached, so a drip that ignites the indicator below is a failure in
  every class, including the ones that tolerate drips that do not
  ignite anything.
- Complete consumption is not a long burn length. A specimen burned
  end to end never demonstrated that it self-extinguishes; its burn
  length merely ran out of specimen, and grading it on that number
  reads a failure as a result inside the limit.
- The reported margin is against the worst specimen. A margin quoted
  from the set average describes a specimen that was never burned.

## Workflow

1. Resolve the application class and read its burn-length limit,
   after-flame limit, dripping allowance and minimum specimen count.
2. Validate each burned specimen: refuse a burn length longer than the
   exposed specimen length, a negative after-flame time, a fractional
   drip count, and an ignited indicator with no drip behind it.
3. Grade the burn length and the after-flame against their limits,
   absorbing floating-point representation error at a bound with a
   named tolerance rather than by relaxing the bound.
4. Fail a fully consumed specimen regardless of its recorded burn
   length, naming the absent self-extinguishing behaviour as the reason.
5. Fail any specimen whose drip ignited the indicator, and fail a
   dripping specimen in a class that allows no drips at all.
6. Refuse a duplicate specimen identifier in the set, since it means two
   different burns are being carried under one record.
7. Take the longest burn of the set as the worst case and report its
   margin to the limit.
8. Assign the set verdict: fail on any failing specimen, inconclusive
   when the set is clean but smaller than the class minimum, pass only
   when it is both clean and large enough.

## Pitfalls

- Grading a materials list against one set of limits. The list spans
  installations, and a single pass clears tape destined for a crew
  volume on equipment-bay numbers.
- Reading a short set as a pass. Below the class minimum the run has no
  statistical standing, and the honest verdict is inconclusive.
- Quoting the average burn length as the result. The set exists because
  the property scatters; the average hides the specimen that decided it.
- Treating a fully consumed specimen as an ordinary long burn. The
  number is bounded by the specimen, not by the material, and the
  failure it represents is qualitative.
- Tolerating a drip that ignited the indicator because the burn length
  was short. The drip carried the fire off the specimen, which is the
  hazard the criterion exists for.
- Widening a limit so a value on the boundary passes. Equality at the
  limit is a representation question, handled by the tolerance inside
  the comparison; the limit itself stays as specified.

## Behavior contract (gate 3)

The class-limit lookup, specimen validation, burn-length and
after-flame comparison with tolerance, full-consumption rule,
drip-ignition rule, worst-case margin and set-size verdict are
exercised by the gate 3 contract test:
scripts/test_q7021_acceptance_criteria.py against
scripts/q7021_acceptance_criteria_logic.py (stdlib unittest, offline).
Run: python3 scripts/test_q7021_acceptance_criteria.py

## Compliance

- ECSS standards are freely downloadable (ESA); cite the source and
  paraphrase per standards-map.yaml.
- compliance: STANDARDS-REF, gated: false.

Attribution

ashfordeOUashfordeOU
View sourceMore from ashfordeOU →
SSkills DirectorySkills Directory

Know which skills are safe — weekly.

Best new skills + every skill we flagged as malicious. From the team that scanned 103,619.

Join free

Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.

Comments (0)

No comments yet. Be the first to comment!

SSkills DirectorySkills Directory

Know which skills are safe — weekly.

Best new skills + every skill we flagged as malicious. From the team that scanned 103,619.

Join free

Related Skills

Caveman

Ultra-compressed communication mode that cuts output tokens while keeping technical accuracy. Levels: lite, full, ultra and the wenyan variants. Use for /caveman, "caveman mode", "talk like caveman", "be brief" or "less tokens".

1074701 votes

Hyperplan

Adversarial multi-agent planning skill. Self-orchestrates 5 hostile category members (unspecified-low, unspecified-high, deep, ultrabrain, artistry) via team-mode for ruthless cross-critique debate, distills only the defensible insights, then MANDATORILY hands the distilled insight bundle to the `plan` agent for executable plan formalization. Use when planning needs maximum rigor and surfacing of weak assumptions, blind spots, and over-engineering. Triggers: 'hyperplan', 'hpp', '/hyperplan', ...

694821 votes

Mcp Code Execution

Routes multi-tool workflows through MCP servers for large datasets and pipelines. Use when Bash tool overhead is limiting throughput on data-heavy tasks.

3351 votes

catchup

Recovers the conversation and failed tool calls of a previous Codex, Claude Code, Antigravity, Cline, Copilot CLI, Cursor, DeepSeek Harness, Kimi, OpenCode, Pi Agent, or ZCode session. Use when the user says "catch up", "what did the last session do", "get me up to speed", "I switched agents", asks to recover/summarize a previous session before continuing, or asks to diagnose or report a catchup failure. Do NOT use for the current conversation, git history, or any non-agent log.

691 votes

math-skill

A comprehensive mathematical reasoning skill for AI assistants — handles arithmetic to research-level problems with rigorous step-by-step reasoning, systematic verification, and transparent uncertainty handling

381 votes
View all in ai-agents →