Use when a lowest assurance parts file has to be judged fit to keep. Audit whether the reduced document file kept for a class 3 commercial part activity is complete, custodied and reachable under ECSS-Q-ST-60-13C clause 6.7: refuse a document with no recognized type, identifier, issue, date or custody mode, name every minimum document the file never produced, list the documents kept above the minimum without letting them cover a shortfall, treat a minimum document the supplier holds with no a...
Scanned 9/27/2026
Install to Claude Code
npx -y skills add ashfordeOU/aero-agent-skills --skill q6013-class-3-documentation --agent claude-codeInstalls into .claude/skills of the current project.
Are you the author of Q6013 Class 3 Documentation?
Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/ashfordeou-q6013-class-3-documentation)More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page.
---
name: q6013-class-3-documentation
description: "Use when a lowest assurance parts file has to be judged fit to keep. Audit whether the reduced document file kept for a class 3 commercial part activity is complete, custodied and reachable under ECSS-Q-ST-60-13C clause 6.7: refuse a document with no recognized type, identifier, issue, date or custody mode, name every minimum document the file never produced, list the documents kept above the minimum without letting them cover a shortfall, treat a minimum document the supplier holds with no access commitment as one the project cannot produce, derive each retention end from the document date in whole years against the horizon the project has to reach, and report minimum-set completeness as a fraction judged at unity under a named tolerance. Trigger: ecss, q-st-60-13c-clause-6-7, class-3-parts-document-file, minimum-kept-document-set, supplier-held-document-access, class-3-retention-horizon, minimum-set-completeness-fraction."
license: Apache-2.0
compliance: STANDARDS-REF
standards:
- id: ecss
reference-only: true
gated: false
domain: space-systems
pack: space-systems
compatibility: "agentskills.io SKILL.md; any SKILL.md host (Claude Code, Hermes, OpenClaw)"
metadata:
domain: space-systems
subdomain: ecss
tags: [ecss, q-st-60-13-commercial-eee-scope, q6013-class-3-documentation, q-st-60-13c-clause-6-7, class-3-parts-document-file, minimum-kept-document-set, supplier-held-document-access, class-3-retention-horizon, minimum-set-completeness-fraction]
version: 0.1.0
author: Aero Agent Skills
---
# ECSS Class 3 Commercial Parts — Documentation (space-systems/ecss/q6013-class-3-documentation)
Use when the task is the documentation provision of ECSS-Q-ST-60-13C clause
6.7 — the short set of documents a commercial electrical, electronic and
electromechanical part activity keeps at the lowest assurance level, who
physically holds each one, and whether the project can still put its hands on
them when somebody asks.
## Domain quick reference
- The class 3 set is short on purpose. At the lowest assurance level the file
proves what was bought, what arrived, what went wrong and where the part
ended up — not that the part was evaluated, screened or lot-accepted,
because at this level it was not.
- A short set is not a soft set. Every one of the few documents kept is
load-bearing precisely because there is nothing else to fall back on, so a
single absent minimum document costs a fifth of the file rather than a
tenth.
- Custody is the class 3 question the higher levels rarely have to ask.
Catalogue procurement leaves much of the paper with the supplier, so where
a document lives, and whether the project has a written claim on it, decide
whether it is evidence or a rumour.
- A supplier holding a document with no access commitment is the same as no
document, for the only purpose that matters: producing it on request. The
file can be nominally full and effectively short at the same time, which is
why coverage is reported twice — as held, and as reachable.
- Documents above the minimum are welcome and never count. A file carrying a
voluntary evaluation report but no as-built parts list is short an as-built
parts list; generosity in one place does not settle a gap in another.
- Retention is two questions. How long the document is kept, and whether
keeping it that long reaches the date the project has to reach. Whole-year
calendar arithmetic answers both exactly and survives a leap-day document.
## Workflow
1. Validate the activity: the part number, the supplier it came from and the
project keeping the file.
2. Validate every document — type, identifier, issue, date, custody mode,
whole-year retention and the parts it covers — and reject a type declared
twice in one file.
3. Compare the class 3 minimum set with the types present, name each absent
minimum document, and list the above-minimum documents separately.
4. Judge custody: flag each minimum document the supplier holds with no
access commitment, and each supplier-access document with no reference to
the clause granting that access.
5. Derive each retention end from the document's own date and its whole-year
retention, compare the retention against the floor and the end against the
required horizon, and keep both findings when both apply.
6. Report held completeness and reachable completeness as separate fractions,
both judged at unity under a named tolerance, with a verdict carrying
every finding.
## Pitfalls
- Importing the class 1 record list. Demanding screening and lot-acceptance
reports from a class 3 activity manufactures findings against documents
nobody was ever asked to produce.
- Counting a document the supplier holds as held. It is only evidence if the
project can produce it, and the second fraction is what shows the
difference.
- Accepting a supplier-access claim with nothing behind it. An access promise
with no clause reference evaporates at exactly the moment it is needed.
- Letting an above-minimum document paper over an absent one. The sets are
scored separately for this reason.
- Reading a long retention as sufficient. Retention runs from the document's
own date, so an early document with a generous period can still expire
before a late one with a short period.
- Stopping at the first finding. The file owner needs the whole list to close
it in one pass rather than one pass per finding.
## Behavior contract (gate 3)
The activity validation, per-document validation, custody judgement,
retention-end derivation and horizon comparison, minimum-set coverage, the
held and reachable completeness fractions and the overall fit-to-keep verdict
are exercised by the gate 3 contract test:
scripts/test_q6013_class_3_documentation.py against
scripts/q6013_class_3_documentation_logic.py (stdlib unittest, offline).
Run: python3 scripts/test_q6013_class_3_documentation.py
## Compliance
- ECSS standards are freely downloadable (ESA); cite the source and
paraphrase per standards-map.yaml.
- compliance: STANDARDS-REF, gated: false.
Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!