Skills DirectorySkills Directory
SkillsLearnSecurityCategoriesDocsCommunityBlog
Sign InSubmit Skill
Skills Directory

Security-tested agent skills for Claude, coding agents, and AI workflows.

Directory

  • Browse Skills
  • All Skills A–Z
  • Claude Skills
  • Claude Code Skills
  • Agent Skills
  • Categories
  • Authors
  • Submit a Skill

Learn

  • Learn Hub
  • Install Claude Skills
  • Write SKILL.md
  • Skills vs MCP
  • Directories Compared

Security

  • Security
  • Methodology
  • Secure Claude Skills
  • Security Badges

Company

  • About
  • Community
  • Blog
  • API Docs
  • Advertise

2026 Skills Directory. All rights reserved.

ProTermsPrivacyRefunds
Back to skills

Pfci Screening

ASecurity

Use when identify the Potentially Fracture Critical Items (PFCIs) within a structural assembly or ground support equipment (GSE) set under ECSS-E-ST-32C clause 6.1: screen each item through the Figure 6-1 decision tree by checking structural role, worst-case failure effect, tensile-load presence, material fracture susceptibility, and minimum dimension threshold; determine whether each item is a PFCI requiring fracture control or a non-PFCI; and record the first gate where non-PFCI items are s...

2 stars
0 votes
0 copies
0 views
Added 9/27/2026
ai-agentspythongo

Works with

claude code

Security Analysis

A100/100

Scanned 9/27/2026

Install to Claude Code

$npx -y skills add ashfordeOU/aero-agent-skills --skill pfci-screening --agent claude-code

Installs into .claude/skills of the current project.

Are you the author of Pfci Screening?

Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.

Security grade badge for Pfci Screening
[![Security: A — Skills Directory](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/api/skills/ashfordeou-pfci-screening/badge)](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/ashfordeou-pfci-screening)

More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page.

Download with Pro
Files
SKILL.md
---
name: pfci-screening
description: "Use when identify the Potentially Fracture Critical Items (PFCIs) within a structural assembly or ground support equipment (GSE) set under ECSS-E-ST-32C clause 6.1: screen each item through the Figure 6-1 decision tree by checking structural role, worst-case failure effect, tensile-load presence, material fracture susceptibility, and minimum dimension threshold; determine whether each item is a PFCI requiring fracture control or a non-PFCI; and record the first gate where non-PFCI items are screened out. GSE items engaged in critical operations are included in the screening scope. Trigger: ecss, e-st-32-structures-scope, pfci, fracture-control, structural-screening, gse, fracture-critical, pfci-list."
license: Apache-2.0
compliance: STANDARDS-REF
standards:
  - id: ecss
    reference-only: true
gated: false
domain: space-systems
pack: space-systems
compatibility: "agentskills.io SKILL.md; any SKILL.md host (Claude Code, Hermes, OpenClaw)"
metadata:
  domain: space-systems
  subdomain: ecss
  tags: [ecss, e-st-32-structures-scope, pfci, fracture-control, structural-screening, gse, fracture-critical, figure-6-1]
  version: 0.1.0
  author: Aero Agent Skills
---

# ECSS Structural — PFCI Screening (space-systems/ecss/pfci-screening)

Use when the task is to identify which structural items and GSE must be
treated as Potentially Fracture Critical Items (PFCIs) under ECSS-E-ST-32C
clause 6.1, using the Figure 6-1 decision-tree to determine the PFCI or
non-PFCI status of each item before fracture control analysis begins.

## Domain quick reference

- An item becomes a PFCI when all five conditions are satisfied: it
  performs a structural function, its failure would be catastrophic or
  critical, it carries tensile loads, it is made of a material susceptible
  to fracture, and its minimum cross-section meets the dimension threshold.
  The first condition that fails screens the item out as non-PFCI; that
  gate is recorded as the disqualifying gate.
- GSE is in scope provided the GSE item is engaged in a critical
  operation — one whose failure could cause loss of flight hardware or a
  crew safety hazard. GSE not engaged during a critical operation is
  excluded from fracture control scope before the five-gate check is
  applied. The GSE pre-check is auditable and distinct from Gate 1.
- The minimum dimension threshold (programme default: 1.27 cm²) is the
  cross-sectional area below which an item is too small to sustain a
  fatigue-initiating flaw of consequence. Programmes may apply a tighter
  threshold; the default applies when no programme-level override is
  specified.
- Material susceptibility covers all metallic alloys, composites,
  ceramics, and glass. A highly ductile material may be declared
  non-susceptible only when supported by approved fracture-toughness data
  and authorised by the fracture control authority.

## Workflow

1. Collect the item inventory: assemble the full list of candidate
   structural items and GSE, each identified by a unique item ID, name,
   structural role flag, worst-case failure-effect category (catastrophic,
   critical, marginal, negligible), tensile-load flag, material
   susceptibility flag, minimum cross-section area (cm²), and — for GSE
   — whether it is engaged in a critical operation.
2. Apply the GSE pre-check: for each GSE item, confirm it supports a
   critical operation. Exclude it as non-PFCI (gate: GSE-CRITICAL-OPERATION)
   if it does not; carry it forward otherwise.
3. Apply Gate 1 — Structural role: exclude items that perform no
   load-bearing structural function (gate: GATE-1-STRUCTURAL).
4. Apply Gate 2 — Failure effect: exclude items whose worst-case failure
   effect is marginal or negligible (gate: GATE-2-FAILURE-EFFECT).
5. Apply Gate 3 — Tensile-load presence: exclude compression-only or
   unloaded items that carry no tensile stress component capable of driving
   crack growth (gate: GATE-3-TENSILE-LOAD).
6. Apply Gate 4 — Material susceptibility: exclude items whose material
   holds an approved non-susceptibility declaration (gate: GATE-4-MATERIAL).
7. Apply Gate 5 — Minimum dimension: exclude items whose minimum
   cross-section is below the threshold (gate: GATE-5-DIMENSION).
8. Items that survive all five gates are PFCI. Compile the PFCI list and
   the per-item gate trail for handover to fracture control analysis.

## Pitfalls

- Omitting GSE from the screening inventory: GSE items that interface
  with flight hardware during critical operations (lifting, transport,
  mechanical test fixtures) must enter the screening process; their
  absence silently understates the fracture control programme scope.
- Recording a non-PFCI outcome without a disqualifying gate: the gate
  trail is auditable evidence; an item screened out without a recorded
  gate cannot be verified during fracture control reviews.
- Applying the minimum-dimension gate before the failure-effect or
  tensile-load gates: the five-gate order is not arbitrary — applying
  Gate 5 first can incorrectly exclude an item that would have been
  screened in at Gate 2 by a programme-level override.
- Conflating "no catastrophic failure mode" with "no fracture concern at
  all": an item with a critical (non-catastrophic) failure mode still
  satisfies Gate 2 and must proceed through the remaining gates.
- Allowing a GSE item to inherit its critical-operation status from its
  parent assembly: each GSE item is assessed individually on whether its
  own failure during the operation could cause the critical outcome.

## Behavior contract (gate 3)

The GSE pre-check, all five screening gates, batch-screening aggregation,
and input-validation error paths are exercised by the gate 3 contract
test: scripts/test_pfci_screening.py against scripts/pfci_screening_logic.py
(stdlib unittest, offline). Run:
python3 scripts/test_pfci_screening.py

## Compliance

- ECSS standards are freely downloadable (ESA); cite the source and
  paraphrase per standards-map.yaml.
- compliance: STANDARDS-REF, gated: false.

Attribution

ashfordeOUashfordeOU
View sourceMore from ashfordeOU →
SSkills DirectorySkills Directory

Know which skills are safe — weekly.

Best new skills + every skill we flagged as malicious. From the team that scanned 103,619.

Join free

Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.

Comments (0)

No comments yet. Be the first to comment!

SSkills DirectorySkills Directory

Know which skills are safe — weekly.

Best new skills + every skill we flagged as malicious. From the team that scanned 103,619.

Join free

Related Skills

Caveman

Ultra-compressed communication mode that cuts output tokens while keeping technical accuracy. Levels: lite, full, ultra and the wenyan variants. Use for /caveman, "caveman mode", "talk like caveman", "be brief" or "less tokens".

1074701 votes

Hyperplan

Adversarial multi-agent planning skill. Self-orchestrates 5 hostile category members (unspecified-low, unspecified-high, deep, ultrabrain, artistry) via team-mode for ruthless cross-critique debate, distills only the defensible insights, then MANDATORILY hands the distilled insight bundle to the `plan` agent for executable plan formalization. Use when planning needs maximum rigor and surfacing of weak assumptions, blind spots, and over-engineering. Triggers: 'hyperplan', 'hpp', '/hyperplan', ...

694821 votes

Mcp Code Execution

Routes multi-tool workflows through MCP servers for large datasets and pipelines. Use when Bash tool overhead is limiting throughput on data-heavy tasks.

3351 votes

catchup

Recovers the conversation and failed tool calls of a previous Codex, Claude Code, Antigravity, Cline, Copilot CLI, Cursor, DeepSeek Harness, Kimi, OpenCode, Pi Agent, or ZCode session. Use when the user says "catch up", "what did the last session do", "get me up to speed", "I switched agents", asks to recover/summarize a previous session before continuing, or asks to diagnose or report a catchup failure. Do NOT use for the current conversation, git history, or any non-agent log.

691 votes

math-skill

A comprehensive mathematical reasoning skill for AI assistants — handles arithmetic to research-level problems with rigorous step-by-step reasoning, systematic verification, and transparent uncertainty handling

381 votes
View all in ai-agents →