Skills DirectorySkills Directory
SkillsLearnSecurityCategoriesDocsCommunityBlog
Sign InSubmit Skill
Skills Directory

Security-tested agent skills for Claude, coding agents, and AI workflows.

Directory

  • Browse Skills
  • All Skills A–Z
  • Claude Skills
  • Claude Code Skills
  • Agent Skills
  • Categories
  • Authors
  • Submit a Skill

Learn

  • Learn Hub
  • Install Claude Skills
  • Write SKILL.md
  • Skills vs MCP
  • Directories Compared

Security

  • Security
  • Methodology
  • Secure Claude Skills
  • Security Badges

Company

  • About
  • Community
  • Blog
  • API Docs
  • Advertise

2026 Skills Directory. All rights reserved.

ProTermsPrivacyRefunds
Back to skills

Environmental Qualification

ASecurity

Use when planning or reviewing DO-160 environmental qualification of airborne equipment: map equipment categories to applicable test-condition sections (temperature, altitude, humidity, vibration, EMC, lightning, and others), verify that the planned test matrix covers every required section, and check operating-temperature ranges per equipment category. Section names and typical category temperature ranges are provided as reference data, with category-specific exclusions to be confirmed again...

2 stars
0 votes
0 copies
0 views
Added 9/27/2026
ai-agentspythongo

Works with

claude code

Security Analysis

A100/100

Scanned 9/27/2026

Install to Claude Code

$npx -y skills add ashfordeOU/aero-agent-skills --skill environmental-qualification --agent claude-code

Installs into .claude/skills of the current project.

Are you the author of Environmental Qualification?

Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.

Security grade badge for Environmental Qualification
[![Security: A — Skills Directory](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/api/skills/ashfordeou-environmental-qualification/badge)](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/ashfordeou-environmental-qualification)

More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page.

Download with Pro
Files
SKILL.md
---
name: environmental-qualification
description: "Use when planning or reviewing DO-160 environmental qualification of airborne equipment: map equipment categories to applicable test-condition sections (temperature, altitude, humidity, vibration, EMC, lightning, and others), verify that the planned test matrix covers every required section, and check operating-temperature ranges per equipment category. Section names and typical category temperature ranges are provided as reference data, with category-specific exclusions to be confirmed against the current revision; all logic is deterministic, offline stdlib. Trigger: DO-160, environmental qualification, test conditions, temperature, altitude, vibration, EMC, lightning, humidity, equipment category."
license: Apache-2.0
compliance: STANDARDS-REF
standards:
  - id: do-160
    reference-only: true
gated: false
domain: avionics
pack: avionics
compatibility: "agentskills.io SKILL.md; any SKILL.md host (Claude Code, Hermes, OpenClaw)"
metadata:
  domain: avionics
  subdomain: do160
  tags: [do-160, environmental-qualification, test-conditions, temperature, altitude, vibration, emc, lightning, humidity, equipment-category]
  version: 0.1.0
  author: Aero Agent Skills
---

# DO-160 Environmental Qualification (avionics/do160/environmental-qualification)

Use when the task is DO-160 environmental qualification of airborne
equipment: scoping the applicable test-condition sections, checking
the planned test matrix for completeness, and validating
operating-temperature ranges per equipment category.

## Domain quick reference

- DO-160G (RTCA, EUROCAE twin ED-14G) defines environmental test
  conditions and procedures for airborne equipment, organized by
  numbered sections.
- Core sections include: 4 Temperature and altitude, 5 Temperature
  variation, 6 Humidity, 7 Operational shocks and crash safety,
  8 Vibration, 9 Explosion proofness, 10 Waterproofness, 11 Fluids
  susceptibility, 16 Power input, 19 Induced signal susceptibility,
  20 Radio frequency susceptibility, 21 Emission of radio frequency
  energy, 22 Lightning induced transient susceptibility,
  23 Lightning direct effects, 24 Icing, 25 Electrostatic discharge.
- Equipment categories (e.g. A1, B2) carry typical operating
  temperature ranges; category-specific section exclusions must be
  confirmed against the current revision.
- The qualification test matrix should cover every applicable
  section for the equipment category.

## Workflow

1. Confirm the applicable DO-160 revision and the equipment category.
2. Map the category to the required test-condition sections.
3. Compare the planned test matrix against the required sections and
   list what is missing.
4. Validate the operating-temperature range for the category.
5. Confirm category-specific exclusions against the current
   revision before freezing the matrix.

## Pitfalls

- Planning a matrix without section 22 (lightning induced transient
  susceptibility) or section 8 (vibration) for equipment that needs
  them.
- Relying on typical temperature ranges without checking the current
  revision's category table.
- Assuming every section applies to every category (exclusions
  exist; confirm them).
- Confusing section numbers (power input is 16, ESD is 25).

## Behavior contract (gate 3)

The logic is exercised by the gate 3 contract test:
scripts/test_environmental_qualification.py against
scripts/environmental_qualification_logic.py (stdlib unittest,
offline). Run: python3 scripts/test_environmental_qualification.py

## Compliance

- Standards referenced, not reproduced: DO-160 text is proprietary
  (RTCA); summary-only per standards-map.yaml and brief 06.
- Section names and temperature ranges are typical reference data;
  verify against the current revision (e.g. DO-160G) before use.
- compliance: STANDARDS-REF, gated: false.

Attribution

ashfordeOUashfordeOU
View sourceMore from ashfordeOU →
SSkills DirectorySkills Directory

Know which skills are safe — weekly.

Best new skills + every skill we flagged as malicious. From the team that scanned 103,619.

Join free

Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.

Comments (0)

No comments yet. Be the first to comment!

SSkills DirectorySkills Directory

Know which skills are safe — weekly.

Best new skills + every skill we flagged as malicious. From the team that scanned 103,619.

Join free

Related Skills

Caveman

Ultra-compressed communication mode that cuts output tokens while keeping technical accuracy. Levels: lite, full, ultra and the wenyan variants. Use for /caveman, "caveman mode", "talk like caveman", "be brief" or "less tokens".

1074701 votes

Hyperplan

Adversarial multi-agent planning skill. Self-orchestrates 5 hostile category members (unspecified-low, unspecified-high, deep, ultrabrain, artistry) via team-mode for ruthless cross-critique debate, distills only the defensible insights, then MANDATORILY hands the distilled insight bundle to the `plan` agent for executable plan formalization. Use when planning needs maximum rigor and surfacing of weak assumptions, blind spots, and over-engineering. Triggers: 'hyperplan', 'hpp', '/hyperplan', ...

694821 votes

Mcp Code Execution

Routes multi-tool workflows through MCP servers for large datasets and pipelines. Use when Bash tool overhead is limiting throughput on data-heavy tasks.

3351 votes

catchup

Recovers the conversation and failed tool calls of a previous Codex, Claude Code, Antigravity, Cline, Copilot CLI, Cursor, DeepSeek Harness, Kimi, OpenCode, Pi Agent, or ZCode session. Use when the user says "catch up", "what did the last session do", "get me up to speed", "I switched agents", asks to recover/summarize a previous session before continuing, or asks to diagnose or report a catchup failure. Do NOT use for the current conversation, git history, or any non-agent log.

691 votes

math-skill

A comprehensive mathematical reasoning skill for AI assistants — handles arithmetic to research-level problems with rigorous step-by-step reasoning, systematic verification, and transparent uncertainty handling

381 votes
View all in ai-agents →