Plan the downlink of one large message under ECSS-E-ST-70-41C clause 6.13.3.3: split it into a first part, the intermediate parts and a last part, number them from one, verify the plan covers the message contiguously with no oversized part, open the transaction identifier against the active set, and produce the truncated part run and abort report when the transfer fails part way. Use when a service 13 downlink part run, its part numbering, its coverage or its abort behaviour is being designed...
Scanned 9/27/2026
Install to Claude Code
npx -y skills add ashfordeOU/aero-agent-skills --skill e7041-downlink-process --agent claude-codeInstalls into .claude/skills of the current project.
Are you the author of E7041 Downlink Process?
Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/ashfordeou-e7041-downlink-process)More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page.
---
name: e7041-downlink-process
description: "Plan the downlink of one large message under ECSS-E-ST-70-41C clause 6.13.3.3: split it into a first part, the intermediate parts and a last part, number them from one, verify the plan covers the message contiguously with no oversized part, open the transaction identifier against the active set, and produce the truncated part run and abort report when the transfer fails part way. Use when a service 13 downlink part run, its part numbering, its coverage or its abort behaviour is being designed or reviewed. Refuses a message that fits one part and an unnamed abort reason. Trigger: ecss, e-st-70-41c, pus-service-13, large-message-downlink-process, first-intermediate-last-part, part-sequence-numbering, downlink-abort-report, transaction-identifier-reuse."
license: Apache-2.0
compliance: STANDARDS-REF
standards:
- id: ecss
reference-only: true
gated: false
domain: space-systems
pack: space-systems
compatibility: "agentskills.io SKILL.md; any SKILL.md host (Claude Code, Hermes, OpenClaw)"
metadata:
domain: space-systems
subdomain: ecss
tags: [ecss, e-st-70-41c, pus-service-13, e7041-downlink-process, large-message-downlink-process, first-intermediate-last-part, part-sequence-numbering, downlink-abort-report, transaction-identifier-reuse]
version: 0.1.0
author: Aero Agent Skills
---
# ECSS Large Packet Transfer — Downlink Process (space-systems/ecss/e7041-downlink-process)
Use when the task is the downlink process of ECSS-E-ST-70-41C clause 6.13.3.3
— turning one large message into the ordered run of first, intermediate and
last part reports the subservice sends, checking that the run really covers
the message, and defining what the subservice emits when the transfer has to
be abandoned before its last part.
## Domain quick reference
- A downlink transaction has exactly three part roles and only one shape: one
first part, zero or more intermediate parts, one last part. The role is not
cosmetic; the receiving end uses it to open its reassembly, to continue it
and to close it, so a run with two firsts or no last is not a transfer.
- Part numbers run from one and increase by one with no gaps. A gap is
indistinguishable at the receiver from a lost part, so a numbering scheme
that skips a value turns a healthy downlink into an apparent failure.
- Only the last part is allowed to be short. Every earlier part carries the
full part size, because a short intermediate part is how the receiver
detects truncation, and a process that emits one deliberately spends that
detector.
- A message that fits inside a single part has no first and last to send. It
is a plain report, and the downlink process refuses it rather than
manufacturing a degenerate two-part run.
- An abort is a real outcome, not an error return. The parts already sent
stay sent, the run stops where it stopped, and the subservice emits an
abort report naming the transaction and the reason so the ground can
distinguish an abandoned transfer from a silent one.
- The transaction identifier is what ties the run together. Reusing one that
is still open merges two messages at the receiver, so the identifier is
claimed when the first part is generated and released only at the last part
or at the abort.
## Workflow
1. Validate the message size and the part size as whole positive octet
counts, and refuse a message that does not exceed one part.
2. Compute the part count by ceiling division and lay out the run: sequence
one is the first part, the final sequence is the last part, everything
between is an intermediate part, each with its offset into the message.
3. Give every part its octet count: the part size for all but the final one,
the remainder for the last.
4. Verify the laid-out run independently of how it was built: one first at
sequence one, one last at the final sequence, contiguous numbering,
contiguous offsets, no part above the part size, no short intermediate
part, and octets summing to the message size.
5. Claim the transaction identifier against the set already open, refusing a
reuse while the earlier transfer is still in progress.
6. When the transfer fails, truncate the run before the failing sequence and
build the abort report from the transaction identifier, the sequence the
process stopped at and a named reason drawn from the recognised set.
7. Report the part run, the per-role report counts, the abort outcome when
there is one, and every finding raised by the verification.
## Pitfalls
- Numbering the parts from zero. The first part is part one, and an
off-by-one at the sender makes every part number disagree with the
receiver's expectation for the whole transfer.
- Padding the last part to the full part size. The receiver sizes the
reassembled message from the octets it was given, so padding either
corrupts the message or forces a length field the transfer does not carry.
- Emitting a short intermediate part to align the run to a convenient
boundary. That is exactly the signature of a truncated transfer and the
receiver is entitled to treat it as one.
- Treating an abort as a discard. The parts already sent are already on the
downlink; the ground needs the abort report to know why the rest never
arrived, and a silent stop leaves a half message with no explanation.
- Releasing the transaction identifier when the last part is queued rather
than when the transfer ends. An identifier reused a moment early is
attached to two different messages at the receiver.
## Behavior contract (gate 3)
The message validation, part run layout, role assignment, independent run
verification, identifier claim, abort truncation and the assembled downlink
assessment are exercised by the gate 3 contract test:
scripts/test_e7041_downlink_process.py against
scripts/e7041_downlink_process_logic.py (stdlib unittest, offline). Run:
python3 scripts/test_e7041_downlink_process.py
## Compliance
- ECSS standards are freely downloadable (ESA); cite the source and
paraphrase per standards-map.yaml.
- compliance: STANDARDS-REF, gated: false.
Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!