Skills DirectorySkills Directory
SkillsLearnSecurityCategoriesDocsCommunityBlog
Sign InSubmit Skill
Skills Directory

Security-tested agent skills for Claude, coding agents, and AI workflows.

Directory

  • Browse Skills
  • All Skills A–Z
  • Claude Skills
  • Claude Code Skills
  • Agent Skills
  • Categories
  • Authors
  • Submit a Skill

Learn

  • Learn Hub
  • Install Claude Skills
  • Write SKILL.md
  • Skills vs MCP
  • Directories Compared

Security

  • Security
  • Methodology
  • Secure Claude Skills
  • Security Badges

Company

  • About
  • Community
  • Blog
  • API Docs
  • Advertise

2026 Skills Directory. All rights reserved.

ProTermsPrivacyRefunds
Back to skills

E50 Activities

ASecurity

Assess the activity set a communication system engineering step actually declares against ECSS-E-ST-50C clause 5.2.1.2, which fixes the activities of the step rather than leaving them to whatever the schedule allowed. Grade a plan on three properties at once: every required activity is declared by somebody, every declared activity both consumes an input and produces an output, and every input consumed is either available to the step or produced by a peer activity. Report coverage as a fractio...

2 stars
0 votes
0 copies
0 views
Added 9/27/2026
ai-agentspythongoaws

Works with

claude code

Security Analysis

A100/100

Scanned 9/27/2026

Install to Claude Code

$npx -y skills add ashfordeOU/aero-agent-skills --skill e50-activities --agent claude-code

Installs into .claude/skills of the current project.

Are you the author of E50 Activities?

Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.

Security grade badge for E50 Activities
[![Security: A — Skills Directory](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/api/skills/ashfordeou-e50-activities/badge)](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/ashfordeou-e50-activities)

More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page.

Download with Pro
Files
SKILL.md
---
name: e50-activities
description: "Assess the activity set a communication system engineering step actually declares against ECSS-E-ST-50C clause 5.2.1.2, which fixes the activities of the step rather than leaving them to whatever the schedule allowed. Grade a plan on three properties at once: every required activity is declared by somebody, every declared activity both consumes an input and produces an output, and every input consumed is either available to the step or produced by a peer activity. Report coverage as a fraction with the orphans and the unsatisfiable inputs named. Use when planning or reviewing a communication system engineering process. Trigger: ecss, e-st-50-communications, communication-system-engineering-activities, communication-process-activity-coverage, activity-input-traceability, orphan-process-activity, communication-design-process-audit."
license: Apache-2.0
compliance: STANDARDS-REF
standards:
  - id: ecss
    reference-only: true
gated: false
domain: space-systems
pack: space-systems
compatibility: "agentskills.io SKILL.md; any SKILL.md host (Claude Code, Hermes, OpenClaw)"
clauses:
  - standard: ECSS-E-ST-50C Rev.2
    clause: 5.2.1.2
    items: [a]
    relation: verifies
metadata:
  domain: space-systems
  subdomain: ecss
  tags: [ecss, e-st-50-communications, e50-activities, communication-system-engineering-activities, communication-process-activity-coverage, activity-input-traceability, orphan-process-activity, communication-design-process-audit]
  version: 0.1.0
  author: Aero Agent Skills
---

# ECSS Communications — Engineering Process Activities (space-systems/ecss/e50-activities)

Use when the question is what a communication system engineering step is
required to do, per ECSS-E-ST-50C clause 5.2.1.2 — and whether the plan in
front of you actually declares it.

## Domain quick reference

- The clause fixes the activities of the step. They are not a menu a
  project draws from according to how much time it has; a step that
  skips one has not done the step, whatever its schedule says.
- A declared activity is a name plus what it consumes and what it
  produces. A name on its own is a heading in a plan, and headings are
  what a review slides past.
- Three properties have to hold together, and a plan can satisfy any one
  while failing the others. Coverage: every required activity is
  declared. Connection: each declared activity consumes something and
  produces something. Satisfiability: each input consumed is either an
  input to the step or an output of a peer activity.
- Coverage without connection is the common failure. Every required
  name appears, none of them is wired to anything, and the step's
  outputs turn out to have been written by whoever had the file open.
- Satisfiability is what catches ordering. An activity whose input no
  peer produces and the step does not hold cannot start, which is a
  scheduling fact the plan is asserting without noticing.

## Workflow

1. Write down the required activity set for the step before looking at
   the plan. In communication system requirements engineering that set
   falls to the customer and holds three: working through what the
   mission's top-level specifications demand, settling which
   requirements are the space communication system's own and putting
   them in writing, and composing the communication system requirements
   no other mission document already yields. Reading the plan first
   anchors the review on what is there rather than on what is owed.
2. Normalise each declared activity into name, inputs and outputs, and
   reject anything that does not carry all three — the missing field is
   usually where the gap is.
3. Reject a duplicate activity name outright. Two entries under one name
   mean two teams believe they own it, which is indistinguishable from
   nobody owning it.
4. Take coverage as a fraction of the required set written down in step
   1, so the fraction states how many of the three owed by the customer
   the plan actually declares, and keep the extra activities separate.
   Extras are not credit; a plan with four invented activities and one
   required one is one third covered, not more.
5. Flag every activity that consumes nothing or produces nothing, with
   the reason stated — one cannot be started from the step's inputs, the
   other cannot reach the step's outputs.
6. Resolve each consumed input against the step's available inputs and
   the peers' outputs, and name every one that resolves to neither.
7. Report all three together. A plan is conformant only when nothing is
   missing, nothing is disconnected, and nothing is unsatisfiable.

## Obligations

| Item | Step |
|---|---|
| ECSS-E-ST-50C Rev.2 5.2.1.2a | 4 |

## Pitfalls

- Grading coverage alone and calling the step planned. It is the cheapest
  of the three checks and the one a plan is most easily written to pass.
- Counting additional activities toward coverage. They may be good work;
  they are not the work the clause names, and mixing them in hides the
  gap the fraction exists to expose.
- Accepting an activity with no declared output. It will be defended as
  "analysis", and analysis that produces nothing cannot be reviewed,
  reused, or shown to have happened.
- Resolving inputs by name against a document list rather than against
  peer outputs. The document exists somewhere in the project, which is
  not the same as this step being able to obtain it.
- Treating a duplicate name as a formatting issue and merging the two
  entries. The duplication is the finding: two owners, one activity.

## Behavior contract (gate 3)

Activity normalisation, duplicate rejection, the coverage fraction with
extras held separate, the disconnected-activity findings and the
unsatisfied-input resolution against peer outputs are exercised by the
gate 3 contract test:
scripts/test_e50_activities.py against
scripts/e50_activities_logic.py (stdlib unittest, offline).
Run:
python3 scripts/test_e50_activities.py

## Compliance

- ECSS standards are freely downloadable (ESA); cite the source and
  paraphrase per standards-map.yaml.
- compliance: STANDARDS-REF, gated: false.

Attribution

ashfordeOUashfordeOU
View sourceMore from ashfordeOU →
SSkills DirectorySkills Directory

Know which skills are safe — weekly.

Best new skills + every skill we flagged as malicious. From the team that scanned 103,619.

Join free

Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.

Comments (0)

No comments yet. Be the first to comment!

SSkills DirectorySkills Directory

Know which skills are safe — weekly.

Best new skills + every skill we flagged as malicious. From the team that scanned 103,619.

Join free

Related Skills

Caveman

Ultra-compressed communication mode that cuts output tokens while keeping technical accuracy. Levels: lite, full, ultra and the wenyan variants. Use for /caveman, "caveman mode", "talk like caveman", "be brief" or "less tokens".

1074701 votes

Hyperplan

Adversarial multi-agent planning skill. Self-orchestrates 5 hostile category members (unspecified-low, unspecified-high, deep, ultrabrain, artistry) via team-mode for ruthless cross-critique debate, distills only the defensible insights, then MANDATORILY hands the distilled insight bundle to the `plan` agent for executable plan formalization. Use when planning needs maximum rigor and surfacing of weak assumptions, blind spots, and over-engineering. Triggers: 'hyperplan', 'hpp', '/hyperplan', ...

694821 votes

Mcp Code Execution

Routes multi-tool workflows through MCP servers for large datasets and pipelines. Use when Bash tool overhead is limiting throughput on data-heavy tasks.

3351 votes

catchup

Recovers the conversation and failed tool calls of a previous Codex, Claude Code, Antigravity, Cline, Copilot CLI, Cursor, DeepSeek Harness, Kimi, OpenCode, Pi Agent, or ZCode session. Use when the user says "catch up", "what did the last session do", "get me up to speed", "I switched agents", asks to recover/summarize a previous session before continuing, or asks to diagnose or report a catchup failure. Do NOT use for the current conversation, git history, or any non-agent log.

691 votes

math-skill

A comprehensive mathematical reasoning skill for AI assistants — handles arithmetic to research-level problems with rigorous step-by-step reasoning, systematic verification, and transparent uncertainty handling

381 votes
View all in ai-agents →