Manage the transport, facility, handling and storage controls an explosive item is owed under ECSS-E-ST-33-11C clause 4.15. Use when the task is deciding whether a magazine, a handling bay or a shipment is actually safe: grouping stored items by compatibility group and reporting every pair that must not share a magazine, aggregating the net explosive quantity against the licensed holding, deriving the quantity-distance separation from the cube-root scaling law and grading real distances to ex...
Scanned 9/27/2026
Install to Claude Code
npx -y skills add ashfordeOU/aero-agent-skills --skill e3311-transport-facilities-handling-storage --agent claude-codeInstalls into .claude/skills of the current project.
Are you the author of E3311 Transport Facilities Handling Storage?
Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/ashfordeou-e3311-transport-facilities-handling-storage)More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page.
---
name: e3311-transport-facilities-handling-storage
description: "Manage the transport, facility, handling and storage controls an explosive item is owed under ECSS-E-ST-33-11C clause 4.15. Use when the task is deciding whether a magazine, a handling bay or a shipment is actually safe: grouping stored items by compatibility group and reporting every pair that must not share a magazine, aggregating the net explosive quantity against the licensed holding, deriving the quantity-distance separation from the cube-root scaling law and grading real distances to exposed sites, checking the storage temperature and humidity envelope, and grading bonding, personnel limits, radio-frequency exclusion and the safing device. Trigger: ecss, e-st-33-11-explosive-subsystem-scope, explosive-compatibility-group-segregation, net-explosive-quantity-licence, quantity-distance-cube-root, explosive-storage-envelope, explosive-handling-rf-exclusion, explosive-shipment-safing."
license: Apache-2.0
compliance: STANDARDS-REF
standards:
- id: ecss
reference-only: true
gated: false
domain: space-systems
pack: space-systems
compatibility: "agentskills.io SKILL.md; any SKILL.md host (Claude Code, Hermes, OpenClaw)"
metadata:
domain: space-systems
subdomain: ecss
tags: [ecss, e-st-33-11-explosive-subsystem-scope, e3311-transport-facilities-handling-storage, explosive-compatibility-group-segregation, net-explosive-quantity-licence, quantity-distance-cube-root, explosive-storage-envelope, explosive-handling-rf-exclusion, explosive-shipment-safing]
version: 0.1.0
author: Aero Agent Skills
---
# ECSS Explosive Subsystems — Transport, Facilities, Handling and Storage (space-systems/ecss/e3311-transport-facilities-handling-storage)
Use when the task is the transport, facility, handling and storage
requirement of ECSS-E-ST-33-11C Rev.1 clause 4.15 -- the period of an
explosive item's life where nothing is being verified and everything
can still go wrong, from the magazine it sits in to the van it leaves
in.
## Domain quick reference
- Compatibility grouping decides what may share a building. Items whose
group requires isolation share a magazine with nothing but their own
kind; items packaged so their effects stay inside the package mix
with almost anything; the ordinary transport-device groups mix with
each other. A store is graded pairwise, because one added item can
break a store that was compliant an hour earlier.
- Quantity-distance is a cube-root law. The separation a store owes an
exposed site scales with the cube root of the net explosive quantity,
so eight times the quantity needs twice the distance, not eight
times. The consequence people get wrong is the other direction:
halving a distance needs the quantity cut by a factor of eight.
- Net explosive quantity is the aggregate actually present, counted
over units, not the figure on the licence and not the figure on the
last stock sheet. A store goes over its licence by receiving a
delivery, which is the moment nobody recomputes it.
- The storage envelope is a shelf-life instrument. Explosives age
faster warm and absorb water damp, so an excursion is a finding even
when the item still looks serviceable, because its remaining life has
been spent rather than its function lost.
- Handling controls exist to keep the item inert while people are
within its effect radius: a bonded handling point so no electrostatic
path builds, a personnel limit so an event injures as few people as
possible, a radio-frequency exclusion so no transmitter couples into
the initiation circuit, and the safing device physically fitted.
- A shipment is a store that moves. It owes the same compatibility
segregation inside the load, a container qualified for the item, the
safing device fitted, and a declared quantity that matches what is
actually packed -- the declaration is what the emergency responder
will act on.
## Workflow
1. Walk the stored items pairwise and report every compatibility
conflict by both item names and both groups, so the reader can see
which item to move.
2. Aggregate the net explosive quantity over units and counts, and
grade it against the licensed holding.
3. Derive the required separation for that aggregate from the
cube-root law and the site's scaling factor, then grade each exposed
site's real distance against it, naming the site in the finding.
4. Grade the measured storage temperature and humidity against the
item's envelope, reporting a low-temperature excursion as readily as
a high one.
5. Grade each handling operation on bonding, personnel count, radio
exclusion distance and the safing device, and report every control
that is open rather than stopping at the first.
6. Grade each shipment on its container, its safed state, the match
between declared and packed quantity, and the compatibility of the
load with itself.
7. Snap a cube root to an exact integer root where one exists, and
absorb representation error at every distance comparison, so a
site sitting exactly on its required distance is not failed by the
last bit of a power.
## Pitfalls
- Grading a store by its largest item instead of pairwise. The conflict
is between two specific items; a store holding one isolation-group
item and twenty compatible ones is non-compliant because of the one.
- Scaling separation linearly with quantity. The cube-root law is what
makes a small increase in holding cheap and a large one expensive,
and a linear estimate is wrong in both directions depending on which
side of the reference point it is taken from.
- Trusting the declared net explosive quantity. It is a copied number;
the aggregate is a computed one, and a mismatch between them is the
finding, not a rounding difference to be reconciled quietly.
- Treating a storage excursion as recoverable because the item still
functions. The envelope protects remaining life, not present
function, so a passed post-excursion test does not close it.
- Leaving the safing device off during a handling operation because the
item is "only being moved". Movement is when it is dropped.
- Failing a site that sits exactly on its required distance. Equality
at the boundary is a representation question, absorbed by the
tolerance inside the comparison; the required distance stays as
derived.
## Behavior contract (gate 3)
The pairwise compatibility grouping, net-explosive-quantity aggregation,
licensed-holding check, cube-root quantity-distance derivation, storage
envelope grading, handling-control grading and shipment grading are
exercised by the gate 3 contract test:
scripts/test_e3311_transport_facilities_handling_storage.py against
scripts/e3311_transport_facilities_handling_storage_logic.py (stdlib
unittest, offline). Run:
python3 scripts/test_e3311_transport_facilities_handling_storage.py
## Compliance
- ECSS standards are freely downloadable (ESA); cite the source and
paraphrase per standards-map.yaml.
- compliance: STANDARDS-REF, gated: false.
Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!