Verify the mechanical clearances of a mechanism against ECSS-E-ST-33-01C clauses 4.7.5.4.8 and 4.7.5.4.9. Use when moving parts, adjacent static parts and multi-layer insulation must be shown never to touch: combining each interface tolerance stack as an arithmetic worst case or a root-sum-square, subtracting thermal distortion, load deflection and mechanism excursion from the nominal gap, raising the MLI requirement to the inflated blanket envelope plus its standoff rather than the compresse...
Scanned 9/27/2026
Install to Claude Code
npx -y skills add ashfordeOU/aero-agent-skills --skill e3301-mechanical-mli-clearances --agent claude-codeInstalls into .claude/skills of the current project.
Are you the author of E3301 Mechanical Mli Clearances?
Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/ashfordeou-e3301-mechanical-mli-clearances)More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page.
---
name: e3301-mechanical-mli-clearances
description: "Verify the mechanical clearances of a mechanism against ECSS-E-ST-33-01C clauses 4.7.5.4.8 and 4.7.5.4.9. Use when moving parts, adjacent static parts and multi-layer insulation must be shown never to touch: combining each interface tolerance stack as an arithmetic worst case or a root-sum-square, subtracting thermal distortion, load deflection and mechanism excursion from the nominal gap, raising the MLI requirement to the inflated blanket envelope plus its standoff rather than the compressed thickness, and naming the governing interface. Trigger: ecss, e-st-33-01-mechanisms-scope, mechanism-moving-part-clearance, mli-blanket-clearance, mli-ballooning-envelope, clearance-tolerance-stack, mechanism-excursion-closure, governing-clearance-interface."
license: Apache-2.0
compliance: STANDARDS-REF
standards:
- id: ecss
reference-only: true
gated: false
domain: space-systems
pack: space-systems
compatibility: "agentskills.io SKILL.md; any SKILL.md host (Claude Code, Hermes, OpenClaw)"
metadata:
domain: space-systems
subdomain: ecss
tags: [ecss, e-st-33-01-mechanisms-scope, e3301-mechanical-mli-clearances, mechanism-moving-part-clearance, mli-blanket-clearance, mli-ballooning-envelope, clearance-tolerance-stack, mechanism-excursion-closure, governing-clearance-interface]
version: 0.1.0
author: Aero Agent Skills
---
# ECSS Mechanisms — Mechanical and MLI Clearances (space-systems/ecss/e3301-mechanical-mli-clearances)
Use when the task is the clearance case of ECSS-E-ST-33-01C clauses
4.7.5.4.8 and 4.7.5.4.9 -- proving that nothing in a mechanism touches
anything it is not meant to touch, across the tolerance stack, the
thermal distortion, the load deflection and the full travel of the
moving parts, with the separate and larger rule that applies wherever
multi-layer insulation is one of the two surfaces.
## Domain quick reference
- A clearance is not the drawing gap. It is the drawing gap less
everything that closes it: the manufacturing and assembly tolerance
stack, the thermal distortion between the two parts, the deflection
each sees under its load case, and the excursion the mechanism
actually travels through.
- The tolerance stack may be taken arithmetically or as a root-sum-square,
and the choice is a justification, not a preference. A
root-sum-square is a statistical statement about independent
contributions; with only one or two contributors it is not a statistic
at all, it is an arithmetic stack with an unearned reduction applied.
- A moving-to-static pair and a static-to-static adjacent pair do not
carry the same floor. The moving pair has to survive every position of
the travel, every repeat of it, and any overtravel the stops allow, so
its floor is the larger of the two.
- MLI is the special case, and it is special because the blanket that is
measured on the bench is not the blanket that flies. Trapped gas
leaves during ascent and the layers separate, so the blanket inflates
well beyond its compressed thickness. The clearance is held against
that inflated envelope plus a standoff, never against the thickness a
caliper reads.
- Every interface is declared, including the ones that look obviously
generous. An interface nobody wrote down is an interface nobody
checked, and the governing case is frequently one that was assumed
comfortable.
- A negative worst-case clearance is contact, and contact is reported as
contact rather than as a large negative margin -- the two lead to
different corrective actions.
## Workflow
1. Enumerate every interface of the mechanism and give each a name, a
kind -- moving, adjacent, or MLI -- and a nominal gap. Refuse a set
that declares no interface, and refuse duplicate names, because a
duplicate silently overwrites a real interface in any report built
from the set.
2. For each interface, combine the tolerance contributions by the
declared method, rejecting a root-sum-square that does not have
enough independent contributions to justify it.
3. Subtract the tolerance, the thermal distortion, the deflection and
the mechanism excursion from the nominal gap. A moving interface must
state its excursion explicitly, even when it is zero, so that a
forgotten travel cannot read as no travel.
4. Derive the required clearance from the kind. For an MLI interface,
inflate the blanket thickness by the ballooning factor and add the
standoff; for the others, take the floor of that kind unless a
project-specific value overrides it.
5. Take the margin as the worst-case clearance less the requirement,
absorbing representation error at zero with a named tolerance rather
than by relaxing the floor.
6. Report every interface with its margin, name the governing one, and
separate the contact findings from the insufficient-margin findings.
## Pitfalls
- Holding the clearance against the compressed MLI thickness. The
blanket inflates on ascent; a gap sized on bench thickness is closed
before the mechanism has been commanded once.
- Using a root-sum-square stack to recover a failing margin. It is only
valid where the contributions are genuinely independent and numerous
enough, and switching methods to pass is a finding rather than a fix.
- Checking clearance at the stowed position only. The governing position
is somewhere in the travel, often at an overtravel stop, and the
stowed gap says nothing about it.
- Omitting thermal distortion because both parts are the same material.
They are rarely at the same temperature, and a gradient across an
assembly closes gaps just as a material mismatch does.
- Reporting a negative clearance as a margin. Contact is a different
finding with a different disposition, and burying it in a margin
column loses that distinction.
- Leaving an interface undeclared because it looks generous. The set is
only as complete as the enumeration, and an interface that was never
listed has never been assessed at any margin.
## Behavior contract (gate 3)
The interface validation, tolerance-stack combination and its
root-sum-square guard, gap-closure arithmetic, MLI inflated-envelope
requirement, per-kind clearance floors, margin comparison, contact
detection and governing-interface selection are exercised by the gate 3
contract test: scripts/test_e3301_mechanical_mli_clearances.py against
scripts/e3301_mechanical_mli_clearances_logic.py (stdlib unittest,
offline). Run:
python3 scripts/test_e3301_mechanical_mli_clearances.py
## Compliance
- ECSS standards are freely downloadable (ESA); cite the source and
paraphrase per standards-map.yaml.
- compliance: STANDARDS-REF, gated: false.
Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!