Skills DirectorySkills Directory
SkillsLearnSecurityCategoriesDocsCommunityBlog
Sign InSubmit Skill
Skills Directory

Security-tested agent skills for Claude, coding agents, and AI workflows.

Directory

  • Browse Skills
  • All Skills A–Z
  • Claude Skills
  • Claude Code Skills
  • Agent Skills
  • Categories
  • Authors
  • Submit a Skill

Learn

  • Learn Hub
  • Install Claude Skills
  • Write SKILL.md
  • Skills vs MCP
  • Directories Compared

Security

  • Security
  • Methodology
  • Secure Claude Skills
  • Security Badges

Company

  • About
  • Community
  • Blog
  • API Docs
  • Advertise

2026 Skills Directory. All rights reserved.

ProTermsPrivacyRefunds
Back to skills

E2007 Tested Unit Bonding

ASecurity

Use when verify that a tested unit is bonded to the test reference-plane only through the bonding provisions built into its own design, as ECSS-E-ST-20-07C clause 5.2.6.2 requires: categorize each bond path as design-provided or test-added, raise every test-added jumper as a setup non-conformance, compute the series strap-and-contact resistance of each design-provided path and the parallel effective bonding-resistance of the set, compare it with the declared bonding-resistance requirement, ch...

2 stars
0 votes
0 copies
0 views
Added 9/27/2026
ai-agentspythongodocumentation

Works with

claude code

Security Analysis

A100/100

Scanned 9/27/2026

Install to Claude Code

$npx -y skills add ashfordeOU/aero-agent-skills --skill e2007-tested-unit-bonding --agent claude-code

Installs into .claude/skills of the current project.

Are you the author of E2007 Tested Unit Bonding?

Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.

Security grade badge for E2007 Tested Unit Bonding
[![Security: A — Skills Directory](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/api/skills/ashfordeou-e2007-tested-unit-bonding/badge)](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/ashfordeou-e2007-tested-unit-bonding)

More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page.

Download with Pro
Files
SKILL.md
---
name: e2007-tested-unit-bonding
description: "Use when verify that a tested unit is bonded to the test reference-plane only through the bonding provisions built into its own design, as ECSS-E-ST-20-07C clause 5.2.6.2 requires: categorize each bond path as design-provided or test-added, raise every test-added jumper as a setup non-conformance, compute the series strap-and-contact resistance of each design-provided path and the parallel effective bonding-resistance of the set, compare it with the declared bonding-resistance requirement, check each bond-strap length-to-width ratio against the low-inductance geometry rule, and reconcile the computed value with the bench reading. Trigger: ecss, e-st-20-electrical-scope, tested-unit-bonding, bonding-provisions, bonding-resistance, bond-strap-aspect-ratio, reference-plane-bonding, design-provided-bonding, test-added-jumper."
license: Apache-2.0
compliance: STANDARDS-REF
standards:
  - id: ecss
    reference-only: true
gated: false
domain: space-systems
pack: space-systems
compatibility: "agentskills.io SKILL.md; any SKILL.md host (Claude Code, Hermes, OpenClaw)"
metadata:
  domain: space-systems
  subdomain: ecss
  tags: [ecss, e-st-20-electrical-scope, e2007-tested-unit-bonding, bonding-provisions, bonding-resistance, bond-strap-aspect-ratio, reference-plane-bonding, design-provided-bonding]
  version: 0.1.0
  author: Aero Agent Skills
---

# ECSS Electrical Test Setup — Tested-Unit Bonding (space-systems/ecss/e2007-tested-unit-bonding)

Use when the task is the ECSS-E-ST-20-07C clause 5.2.6.2 restriction that
a tested unit is bonded to the test reference plane only by the bonding
means already built into its own design -- categorizing every bond path
by provenance, excluding test-added paths from the number, computing the
effective bonding resistance of the design-provided set, and reconciling
it with the bench measurement.

## Domain quick reference

- The bond between a unit and the reference plane is part of what the
  measurement characterizes, not part of the instrumentation. A strap the
  laboratory adds for convenience lowers the impedance the flight
  configuration will actually have, so the measurement then describes a
  unit that will never fly.
- Every bond path is categorized by provenance before any arithmetic:
  design-provided (the unit design, its interface documentation, its
  qualified mounting interface) or test-added (a setup jumper, an
  auxiliary laboratory strap). A provenance outside that set is a record
  defect and is rejected rather than assumed benign.
- A test-added path is a non-conformance on its own, independent of what
  it measures. Its resistance is never folded into the result, because
  a parallel path can only lower the combined value and would make an
  out-of-family bond look compliant.
- The direct-current resistance of one path is the strap or foot
  resistance -- material resistivity times length divided by the
  cross-section -- in series with the contact resistance of every joint
  along it. Joints usually dominate a short, thick foot.
- Paths energized together carry current in parallel, so the unit's
  effective bonding resistance is the parallel combination of the
  design-provided paths only, and it is always lower than the lowest
  single path.
- Direct current is not the whole requirement. At radio frequency the
  strap inductance dominates, and that is controlled geometrically by
  holding the strap length-to-width ratio at or below a stated maximum
  (commonly five to one).
- The computed value is finally reconciled with the bench reading. A
  relative disagreement beyond a stated fraction means either the model
  or a joint is wrong; it is reported, not averaged.

## Workflow

1. Categorize every bond path by provenance as design-provided or
   test-added. Reject an unrecognized provenance, a path without a name,
   or duplicate path names before computing anything.
2. Raise each test-added path as a setup non-conformance naming the path,
   and remove it from the resistance calculation entirely.
3. For each design-provided path, compute the strap resistance from the
   material resistivity, length and cross-section, and add the series
   contact resistance of every joint.
4. Combine the design-provided path resistances in parallel to get the
   effective bonding resistance, and compare it with the declared
   bonding-resistance requirement.
5. Check each design-provided strap's length-to-width ratio against the
   low-inductance maximum; a compliant direct-current resistance on a
   long, thin strap is still a radio-frequency finding.
6. Reconcile the computed effective resistance with the bench reading
   against a stated relative tolerance, and flag a missing bench reading
   as a finding in its own right.
7. Aggregate: the bonding is as designed only when no test-added path
   exists, the effective resistance is within requirement, every strap
   geometry passes, and the bench reading agrees.

## Pitfalls

- Adding a jumper because the bond "looked high" and re-measuring. That
  changes the configuration the clause exists to preserve; the correct
  move is to record the finding and restore the design bonding means.
- Folding a test-added path into the parallel combination. Parallel paths
  can only lower the result, so including the jumper turns a
  non-conformance into an apparent pass.
- Computing strap resistance and stopping there. The joints are in series
  with it and typically dominate a short, thick mounting foot by an order
  of magnitude.
- Accepting a compliant direct-current resistance on a long, thin strap.
  The resistance requirement and the length-to-width geometry rule are
  independent, and the geometry rule is the one that governs at radio
  frequency.
- Treating a missing bench measurement as a pass because the computed
  number is comfortable. The computation uses declared materials and
  nominal joints; the reading is the only evidence of the joint actually
  made.
- Reporting only the combined figure. A single bad joint can hide inside
  a parallel set, so each path resistance stays on the record beside the
  combined value.
- Letting a series sum that lands a few units in the last place above the
  requirement read as an exceedance. The logic absorbs representation
  error with a named tolerance far below any milliohm value; the
  requirement itself is never widened.

## Behavior contract (gate 3)

The provenance categorization, strap and contact resistance, parallel
combination, strap-geometry, requirement-comparison and bench
reconciliation logic is exercised by the gate 3 contract test:
`scripts/test_e2007_tested_unit_bonding.py` against
`scripts/e2007_tested_unit_bonding_logic.py` (stdlib unittest, offline).
Run: python3 scripts/test_e2007_tested_unit_bonding.py

## Compliance

- ECSS standards are freely downloadable (ESA); cite the source and
  paraphrase per standards-map.yaml.
- compliance: STANDARDS-REF, gated: false.

Attribution

ashfordeOUashfordeOU
View sourceMore from ashfordeOU →
SSkills DirectorySkills Directory

Know which skills are safe — weekly.

Best new skills + every skill we flagged as malicious. From the team that scanned 103,619.

Join free

Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.

Comments (0)

No comments yet. Be the first to comment!

SSkills DirectorySkills Directory

Know which skills are safe — weekly.

Best new skills + every skill we flagged as malicious. From the team that scanned 103,619.

Join free

Related Skills

Caveman

Ultra-compressed communication mode that cuts output tokens while keeping technical accuracy. Levels: lite, full, ultra and the wenyan variants. Use for /caveman, "caveman mode", "talk like caveman", "be brief" or "less tokens".

1074701 votes

Hyperplan

Adversarial multi-agent planning skill. Self-orchestrates 5 hostile category members (unspecified-low, unspecified-high, deep, ultrabrain, artistry) via team-mode for ruthless cross-critique debate, distills only the defensible insights, then MANDATORILY hands the distilled insight bundle to the `plan` agent for executable plan formalization. Use when planning needs maximum rigor and surfacing of weak assumptions, blind spots, and over-engineering. Triggers: 'hyperplan', 'hpp', '/hyperplan', ...

694821 votes

Mcp Code Execution

Routes multi-tool workflows through MCP servers for large datasets and pipelines. Use when Bash tool overhead is limiting throughput on data-heavy tasks.

3351 votes

catchup

Recovers the conversation and failed tool calls of a previous Codex, Claude Code, Antigravity, Cline, Copilot CLI, Cursor, DeepSeek Harness, Kimi, OpenCode, Pi Agent, or ZCode session. Use when the user says "catch up", "what did the last session do", "get me up to speed", "I switched agents", asks to recover/summarize a previous session before continuing, or asks to diagnose or report a catchup failure. Do NOT use for the current conversation, git history, or any non-agent log.

691 votes

math-skill

A comprehensive mathematical reasoning skill for AI assistants — handles arithmetic to research-level problems with rigorous step-by-step reasoning, systematic verification, and transparent uncertainty handling

381 votes
View all in ai-agents →