Determine which power-bus voltage extreme governs a conducted emission measurement, anchored at ECSS-E-ST-20-07C clause 5.2.12: align the sweeps recorded at the lower and the upper supply setting on one frequency grid, take the worst level at every frequency and the setting that produced it, rank the settings by the largest exceedance each reaches above the declared limit line, and refuse a campaign that exercised a single extreme, that ran at neither, or that reported a setting other than th...
Scanned 9/27/2026
Install to Claude Code
npx -y skills add ashfordeOU/aero-agent-skills --skill e2007-power-bus-voltage-setting --agent claude-codeInstalls into .claude/skills of the current project.
Are you the author of E2007 Power Bus Voltage Setting?
Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/ashfordeou-e2007-power-bus-voltage-setting)More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page.
---
name: e2007-power-bus-voltage-setting
description: "Determine which power-bus voltage extreme governs a conducted emission measurement, anchored at ECSS-E-ST-20-07C clause 5.2.12: align the sweeps recorded at the lower and the upper supply setting on one frequency grid, take the worst level at every frequency and the setting that produced it, rank the settings by the largest exceedance each reaches above the declared limit line, and refuse a campaign that exercised a single extreme, that ran at neither, or that reported a setting other than the governing one. Use when planning, auditing or accepting a conducted emission run. Trigger: ecss, e-st-20-07c, power-bus-voltage-setting, conducted-emission-voltage-extreme, worst-case-supply-setting, bus-voltage-emission-envelope, emission-limit-line-exceedance, emission-sweep-grid-alignment."
license: Apache-2.0
compliance: STANDARDS-REF
standards:
- id: ecss
reference-only: true
gated: false
domain: space-systems
pack: space-systems
compatibility: "agentskills.io SKILL.md; any SKILL.md host (Claude Code, Hermes, OpenClaw)"
metadata:
domain: space-systems
subdomain: ecss
tags: [ecss, e-st-20-electrical-scope, e-st-20-07c, e2007-power-bus-voltage-setting, conducted-emission-voltage-extreme, worst-case-supply-setting, bus-voltage-emission-envelope, emission-limit-line-exceedance, emission-sweep-grid-alignment]
version: 0.1.0
author: Aero Agent Skills
---
# ECSS Electrical — Power Bus Voltage Setting (space-systems/ecss/e2007-power-bus-voltage-setting)
Use when the task is the supply-setting rule of ECSS-E-ST-20-07C clause
5.2.12 -- a conducted emission measurement is performed at the bus
voltage extreme that produces the worst result, which means both
extremes have to be recorded before the governing one can be named.
## Domain quick reference
- The quantity that decides the setting is the emission, not the
voltage. A switching converter can emit more at the low extreme,
where it draws more current and its duty cycle lengthens, or at the
high extreme, where switching transitions are faster and harmonics
reach further up the band. Which one wins is a property of the unit
and is settled by measurement, not by assumption.
- Both extremes have to be exercised. A campaign that recorded one of
them has no basis on which to call it the worst, and a run held at
the nominal bus voltage is not a substitute for either.
- The comparison is point by point on one frequency grid. Two sweeps
taken on different grids cannot be compared without inventing values
between the points, so a grid mismatch is an input error and not
something to interpolate past.
- The envelope is the per-frequency worst level with the setting that
produced it attached. When one setting holds every point, that
setting governs and one run can be reported. When the settings cross,
no single run is the worst result and the reported spectrum is the
envelope of both.
- Ranking the settings against a limit line is not the same as ranking
them on absolute level. A limit that falls with frequency can make a
quieter run the closer one to the limit, and the setting that matters
is the one with the largest exceedance, not the largest amplitude.
- An exactly equal pair of levels is a tie, not a winner. Ties are
resolved on the lower voltage so two analysts reach the same answer,
and the decibel comparison absorbs representation error rather than
nudging a level.
## Workflow
1. Validate the declared supply extremes: both positive, and the upper
genuinely above the lower.
2. Normalize each run: the setting label, the bus voltage it was held
at, and its sweep. Reject an unknown key, a blank label, a
duplicated label, a sweep of fewer than two points and a sweep that
does not advance in frequency.
3. Establish the common frequency grid across the runs and refuse a
mismatch in point count or in any frequency.
4. Build the envelope: the worst level at every frequency, the setting
that produced it, and that setting's voltage, ties going to the
lower voltage.
5. Compute per run the largest absolute level, the largest exceedance
above the limit line when one is declared, and the number of
frequencies at which the run holds the envelope.
6. Rank the settings on exceedance, or on absolute level when no limit
line was declared, breaking ties on envelope coverage and then on
the lower voltage.
7. Report findings: an extreme never exercised, a run at neither
extreme, a governing setting that is not worst everywhere, a
reported setting other than the governing one, and any envelope
point above the limit.
## Pitfalls
- Deciding the extreme from the circuit rather than from the data.
Whether the low or the high extreme emits more depends on the
converter topology and the load, and the clause asks for the worst
measured result.
- Running the nominal bus voltage and treating it as a middle case that
covers the extremes. It bounds neither, and an emission peak at an
extreme can be tens of decibels above it.
- Comparing sweeps taken on different resolution grids by interpolating
one onto the other, which invents the very points a narrowband
emission hides between.
- Reporting the run with the highest absolute level when a sloping
limit line means the other setting is the one closest to breaching.
- Reporting a single setting when the two runs cross. The worst result
is then the envelope, and reporting either run alone understates the
emission somewhere in the band.
- Breaking a tie by whichever run was processed first. Ties are
resolved on the lower voltage so the selection is reproducible, and
the level comparison absorbs representation error instead of moving
the limit.
## Behavior contract (gate 3)
The extreme validation, sweep normalization, grid alignment, limit-line
interpolation, envelope construction, per-run statistics, governing
selection and campaign findings are exercised by the gate 3 contract
test: scripts/test_e2007_power_bus_voltage_setting.py against
scripts/e2007_power_bus_voltage_setting_logic.py (stdlib unittest,
offline). Run:
python3 scripts/test_e2007_power_bus_voltage_setting.py
## Compliance
- ECSS standards are freely downloadable (ESA); cite the source and
paraphrase per standards-map.yaml.
- compliance: STANDARDS-REF, gated: false.
Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!