Skills DirectorySkills Directory
SkillsLearnSecurityCategoriesDocsCommunityBlog
Sign InSubmit Skill
Skills Directory

Security-tested agent skills for Claude, coding agents, and AI workflows.

Directory

  • Browse Skills
  • All Skills A–Z
  • Claude Skills
  • Claude Code Skills
  • Agent Skills
  • Categories
  • Authors
  • Submit a Skill

Learn

  • Learn Hub
  • Install Claude Skills
  • Write SKILL.md
  • Skills vs MCP
  • Directories Compared

Security

  • Security
  • Methodology
  • Secure Claude Skills
  • Security Badges

Company

  • About
  • Community
  • Blog
  • API Docs
  • Advertise

2026 Skills Directory. All rights reserved.

ProTermsPrivacyRefunds
Back to skills

E2001 Analysis Level Two Requirements

ASecurity

Use when determine which radio-frequency equipment items escalate to the second multipactor-analysis-level of ECSS-E-ST-20-01C clause 5.3.2.3.1 instead of staying with the first-level susceptibility-chart lookup: categorize each item against its equipment-type profile, form the frequency-gap-product of its narrowest multipactor-gap and check the validated chart-band, evaluate the peak-to-mean field-uniformity-ratio, and read the first-level margin-outcome. Any driver - geometry no parallel-pl...

2 stars
0 votes
0 copies
0 views
Added 9/27/2026
ai-agentspythongo

Works with

claude code

Security Analysis

A100/100

Scanned 9/27/2026

Install to Claude Code

$npx -y skills add ashfordeOU/aero-agent-skills --skill e2001-analysis-level-two-requirements --agent claude-code

Installs into .claude/skills of the current project.

Are you the author of E2001 Analysis Level Two Requirements?

Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.

Security grade badge for E2001 Analysis Level Two Requirements
[![Security: A — Skills Directory](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/api/skills/ashfordeou-e2001-analysis-level-two-requirements/badge)](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/ashfordeou-e2001-analysis-level-two-requirements)

More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page.

Download with Pro
Files
SKILL.md
---
name: e2001-analysis-level-two-requirements
description: "Use when determine which radio-frequency equipment items escalate to the second multipactor-analysis-level of ECSS-E-ST-20-01C clause 5.3.2.3.1 instead of staying with the first-level susceptibility-chart lookup: categorize each item against its equipment-type profile, form the frequency-gap-product of its narrowest multipactor-gap and check the validated chart-band, evaluate the peak-to-mean field-uniformity-ratio, and read the first-level margin-outcome. Any driver - geometry no parallel-plate-chart represents, an out-of-band frequency-gap-product, field-non-uniformity above the uniformity-limit, a first-level margin-shortfall - escalates the item, while a dielectric-exposed equipment-type routes instead to a seeded multipactor-test because the tracked-electron model carries no surface-charging path. Trigger: ecss, e-st-20-electrical-scope, second-analysis-level, multipactor-analysis-level, frequency-gap-product, equipment-type-eligibility, parallel-plate-chart-band, field-uniformity-ratio."
license: Apache-2.0
compliance: STANDARDS-REF
standards:
  - id: ecss
    reference-only: true
gated: false
domain: space-systems
pack: space-systems
compatibility: "agentskills.io SKILL.md; any SKILL.md host (Claude Code, Hermes, OpenClaw)"
metadata:
  domain: space-systems
  subdomain: ecss
  tags: [ecss, e-st-20-electrical-scope, e2001-analysis-level-two-requirements, second-analysis-level, multipactor-analysis-level, frequency-gap-product, equipment-type-eligibility, field-uniformity-ratio]
  version: 0.1.0
  author: Aero Agent Skills
---

# ECSS Multipactor — Second-Analysis-Level Applicability (space-systems/ecss/e2001-analysis-level-two-requirements)

Use when the task is deciding, per radio-frequency equipment item, whether
the detailed second multipactor-analysis-level of ECSS-E-ST-20-01C clause
5.3.2.3.1 applies — which equipment-types are eligible for it, what
escalates an item off the first level, and what the second level needs on
record before it can start.

## Domain quick reference

- The standard offers two multipactor-analysis-levels. The first level maps
  the susceptible geometry onto an equivalent parallel-plate gap, forms the
  frequency-gap-product, and reads a breakdown-voltage off a validated
  susceptibility-chart. It is fast and deliberately conservative, but it is
  only meaningful where the real field distribution behaves like a uniform
  parallel-plate field and where the frequency-gap-product sits inside the
  chart's validated band.
- The second level replaces that lookup with a three-dimensional
  electromagnetic field model plus electron-trajectory tracking against
  measured secondary-emission data. It is more expensive and it is the route
  the standard reserves for geometries and operating points where the first
  level either cannot be applied or returns a shortfall that the designer
  believes is an artefact of its conservatism.
- Eligibility is a property of the equipment-type, not of the margin alone.
  A metal-walled guided-wave, planar, radiative or interface item is
  representable by the tracked-electron model of the second level. An item
  whose dielectric is exposed to the radio-frequency field is not: the
  dielectric accumulates surface charge, which the metal-wall tracking model
  does not carry, so such an item is escalated to a seeded multipactor-test
  rather than to the second level.
- The second level cannot start on geometry alone. It needs a
  secondary-emission dataset for the electrode material in its flight surface
  condition, an identified three-dimensional field model, and a validation
  reference for the electron-tracking solver. A missing one of those is a
  finding in its own right, not a silent assumption.

## Workflow

1. Categorize every multipactor-critical item by equipment-type and pull its
   profile: whether a parallel-plate-chart represents it, and whether the
   tracked-electron model of the second level is admissible for it. Reject an
   unrecognized equipment-type before it enters the assessment.
2. Form the frequency-gap-product from the operating frequency and the
   narrowest susceptible gap, and check it against the validated chart-band.
   Outside the band the first-level reading carries no credible value.
3. Compute the peak-to-mean field-uniformity-ratio across that gap from the
   field model. Above the uniformity-limit the single-equivalent-gap premise
   of the first level no longer holds.
4. Where the first level is applicable, read its margin-outcome against the
   required value. Treat an absent margin record as a driver, not as a pass.
5. Collect the drivers. No driver means the first level is sufficient. One or
   more drivers escalate the item: to the second level where the
   equipment-type admits the tracked-electron model, and to a seeded
   multipactor-test where it does not.
6. For every item escalated to the second level, confirm the three
   prerequisites are on record; raise a finding for each missing one and
   report the item as not yet ready.
7. Aggregate per item and roll up counts by route; the inventory is not clean
   until no item carries an open finding.

## Pitfalls

- Reading a first-level chart value for a geometry the chart does not
  represent, and treating the number as conservative. A chart lookup outside
  its premises is not conservative, it is undefined.
- Escalating on margin-shortfall alone and never checking the
  frequency-gap-product against the validated band — an out-of-band item can
  show a comfortable first-level margin that means nothing.
- Sending a dielectric-exposed item to the second level because it is "more
  detailed". The tracked-electron model has no surface-charging path, so the
  detailed run is silently optimistic; that item belongs on hardware.
- Declaring an item ready for the second level while its secondary-emission
  dataset, field model or solver-validation reference is unset. An unset
  prerequisite is an open finding, not a default.
- Comparing a decibel margin against its requirement with a bare inequality.
  A margin formed as a difference of logarithms can land a unit in the last
  place below an exactly compliant value; absorb the representation error in
  the comparison, never by relaxing the required value.

## Behavior contract (gate 3)

The equipment-type categorization, chart-band check, field-uniformity-ratio,
escalation routing and prerequisite logic are exercised by the gate 3
contract test: scripts/test_e2001_analysis_level_two_requirements.py against
scripts/e2001_analysis_level_two_requirements_logic.py (stdlib unittest,
offline). Run: python3 scripts/test_e2001_analysis_level_two_requirements.py

## Compliance

- ECSS standards are freely downloadable (ESA); cite the source and
  paraphrase per standards-map.yaml.
- compliance: STANDARDS-REF, gated: false.

Attribution

ashfordeOUashfordeOU
View sourceMore from ashfordeOU →
SSkills DirectorySkills Directory

Know which skills are safe — weekly.

Best new skills + every skill we flagged as malicious. From the team that scanned 103,619.

Join free

Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.

Comments (0)

No comments yet. Be the first to comment!

SSkills DirectorySkills Directory

Know which skills are safe — weekly.

Best new skills + every skill we flagged as malicious. From the team that scanned 103,619.

Join free

Related Skills

Caveman

Ultra-compressed communication mode that cuts output tokens while keeping technical accuracy. Levels: lite, full, ultra and the wenyan variants. Use for /caveman, "caveman mode", "talk like caveman", "be brief" or "less tokens".

1074701 votes

Hyperplan

Adversarial multi-agent planning skill. Self-orchestrates 5 hostile category members (unspecified-low, unspecified-high, deep, ultrabrain, artistry) via team-mode for ruthless cross-critique debate, distills only the defensible insights, then MANDATORILY hands the distilled insight bundle to the `plan` agent for executable plan formalization. Use when planning needs maximum rigor and surfacing of weak assumptions, blind spots, and over-engineering. Triggers: 'hyperplan', 'hpp', '/hyperplan', ...

694821 votes

Mcp Code Execution

Routes multi-tool workflows through MCP servers for large datasets and pipelines. Use when Bash tool overhead is limiting throughput on data-heavy tasks.

3351 votes

catchup

Recovers the conversation and failed tool calls of a previous Codex, Claude Code, Antigravity, Cline, Copilot CLI, Cursor, DeepSeek Harness, Kimi, OpenCode, Pi Agent, or ZCode session. Use when the user says "catch up", "what did the last session do", "get me up to speed", "I switched agents", asks to recover/summarize a previous session before continuing, or asks to diagnose or report a catchup failure. Do NOT use for the current conversation, git history, or any non-agent log.

691 votes

math-skill

A comprehensive mathematical reasoning skill for AI assistants — handles arithmetic to research-level problems with rigorous step-by-step reasoning, systematic verification, and transparent uncertainty handling

381 votes
View all in ai-agents →