Use when compute the dissipative loss, depolarisation and diffusivity of a reflecting or transmitting antenna surface under ECSS-E-ST-20C clause 7.2.2.2.2: categorize each surface as reflecting-surface (metal-reflector, mesh-reflector, grid-polariser) or transmitting-surface (dielectric-lens, radome-wall, dichroic-panel), derive conductor-loss from the surface-resistance at the operating frequency or dielectric-loss from wall-thickness, permittivity and loss-tangent, convert rms-surface-rough...
Scanned 9/27/2026
Install to Claude Code
npx -y skills add ashfordeOU/aero-agent-skills --skill e20-reflector-and-lens-antennas --agent claude-codeInstalls into .claude/skills of the current project.
Are you the author of E20 Reflector And Lens Antennas?
Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/ashfordeou-e20-reflector-and-lens-antennas)More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page.
---
name: e20-reflector-and-lens-antennas
description: "Use when compute the dissipative loss, depolarisation and diffusivity of a reflecting or transmitting antenna surface under ECSS-E-ST-20C clause 7.2.2.2.2: categorize each surface as reflecting-surface (metal-reflector, mesh-reflector, grid-polariser) or transmitting-surface (dielectric-lens, radome-wall, dichroic-panel), derive conductor-loss from the surface-resistance at the operating frequency or dielectric-loss from wall-thickness, permittivity and loss-tangent, convert rms-surface-roughness into a specular-efficiency and a diffuse-scattered fraction, combine depolarisation contributions into a cross-polar-discrimination and an axial-ratio, then check the summed surface-loss-budget, diffusivity and cross-polar-discrimination against the antenna requirement. Trigger: ecss, e-st-20-electrical-scope, reflector-and-lens-antennas, reflecting-surface, transmitting-surface, cross-polar-discrimination, diffuse-scattering, surface-roughness-efficiency, dielectric-loss-tangent, conductor-surface-resistance."
license: Apache-2.0
compliance: STANDARDS-REF
standards:
- id: ecss
reference-only: true
gated: false
domain: space-systems
pack: space-systems
compatibility: "agentskills.io SKILL.md; any SKILL.md host (Claude Code, Hermes, OpenClaw)"
metadata:
domain: space-systems
subdomain: ecss
tags: [ecss, e-st-20-electrical-scope, e20-reflector-and-lens-antennas, reflecting-surface, transmitting-surface, cross-polar-discrimination, diffuse-scattering, surface-roughness-efficiency]
version: 0.1.0
author: Aero Agent Skills
---
# ECSS Electrical — Reflector and Lens Antenna Surfaces (space-systems/ecss/e20-reflector-and-lens-antennas)
Use when the task is the surface-quality assessment of ECSS-E-ST-20C
clause 7.2.2.2.2 -- quantifying the loss, the depolarisation and the
diffusivity introduced by a reflecting or a transmitting antenna
surface, and rolling those three effects into the antenna's
radiation-performance budget.
## Domain quick reference
- Clause 7.2.2.2.2 separates an antenna surface into two families.
A reflecting-surface (solid metal-reflector, mesh-reflector,
grid-polariser, sub-reflector) returns the incident field; its
dissipative term is the conductor-loss set by the surface-resistance
Rs = sqrt(pi f mu0 / sigma), which rises as the square root of
frequency and falls as the square root of conductivity. A
transmitting-surface (dielectric-lens, radome-wall, dichroic-panel)
passes the field; its dissipative term is the dielectric-loss set by
the loss-tangent, the relative-permittivity and the refracted path
length through the wall, which is longer than the wall-thickness at
oblique incidence.
- Diffusivity is the fraction of incident power that leaves the
surface outside the specular direction because of rms-surface-
roughness. It is a phase-error efficiency, not a dissipation: the
power is scattered into the sidelobe-region and the wide-angle
pattern rather than absorbed, so it degrades on-axis directivity and
raises stray radiation at the same time. A reflecting-surface sees
the round-trip path error (a factor 4 pi sigma cos(theta) / lambda);
a transmitting-surface sees only the refractive-index excess
(a factor 2 pi (n - 1) sigma / lambda), so the identical roughness
costs a reflecting-surface far more.
- Depolarisation is the conversion of the wanted polarisation into the
orthogonal one by surface anisotropy -- mesh weave direction, grid
pitch error, lens birefringence, a non-symmetric curvature error.
Contributions combine in orthogonal power, not in decibels: each
contribution is converted to a cross-polar power ratio, the ratios
are summed, and the sum is converted back to a single
cross-polar-discrimination. The equivalent axial-ratio follows from
that discrimination and is the form a circular-polarisation
requirement is usually written in.
## Workflow
1. Categorize every surface in the radiating path as reflecting or
transmitting. Reject an unrecognized surface family before it
enters the budget -- the two families take different loss models
and different roughness sensitivities.
2. Compute the dissipative term. Reflecting: surface-resistance at the
operating frequency, absorptivity at the incidence angle, repeated
per bounce for a dual-reflector chain. Transmitting: attenuation
constant from loss-tangent and relative-permittivity times the
refracted path length through the wall.
3. Convert rms-surface-roughness into a specular-efficiency with the
family-appropriate phase-error factor, and read the complement as
the diffuse-scattered fraction; express it also as an equivalent
scatter-loss in decibels for the budget.
4. Convert each depolarisation contribution into a cross-polar power
ratio, sum the ratios, convert back to one cross-polar-
discrimination, and derive the equivalent axial-ratio.
5. Sum the dissipative and scatter terms into the surface-loss-budget
and compare budget, diffuse fraction and cross-polar-discrimination
against the antenna requirement. Absorb representation error at an
exact limit with a named tolerance -- never widen the limit itself.
6. Aggregate per surface; the radiating path is compliant only when
every surface's finding list is empty.
## Pitfalls
- Applying the reflecting-surface roughness factor to a lens or a
radome-wall. The transmitting phase error scales with the
refractive-index excess, not with a round trip, so reusing the
reflector factor overstates the diffuse fraction by a large margin.
- Adding depolarisation contributions in decibels. Cross-polar terms
add in power; summing decibels understates the combined cross-polar
level and passes a surface that is actually out of specification.
- Treating the diffuse-scattered fraction as dissipated. It leaves the
aperture as wide-angle radiation, so it belongs in both the
directivity budget and the stray-radiation case.
- Ignoring incidence angle on a transmitting-surface. At oblique
incidence the refracted path through the wall exceeds the
wall-thickness, and the dielectric-loss grows with it.
- Reading "no violation" from a surface whose requirement fields were
never populated -- an absent limit is an open requirement, which is
a finding, not a pass.
## Behavior contract (gate 3)
The surface-categorization, conductor-loss, dielectric-loss,
diffusivity and depolarisation logic is exercised by the gate 3
contract test: scripts/test_e20_reflector_and_lens_antennas.py against
scripts/e20_reflector_and_lens_antennas_logic.py (stdlib unittest,
offline). Run:
python3 scripts/test_e20_reflector_and_lens_antennas.py
## Compliance
- ECSS standards are freely downloadable (ESA); cite the source and
paraphrase per standards-map.yaml.
- compliance: STANDARDS-REF, gated: false.
Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!