Use when determine whether the ECSS-E-ST-20C clause 5.6.1 battery provisions reach a given on-board energy store: categorize every item as a secondary rechargeable electrochemical battery, a primary non-rechargeable electrochemical battery, an electrochemical converter that holds no internal reactants, or a non-electrochemical store; resolve the declared cell assembly into nominal voltage, ampere-hour capacity and stored energy; select the provision groups that follow from the category; and r...
Scanned 9/27/2026
Install to Claude Code
npx -y skills add ashfordeOU/aero-agent-skills --skill e20-battery-clause-applicability --agent claude-codeInstalls into .claude/skills of the current project.
Are you the author of E20 Battery Clause Applicability?
Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/ashfordeou-e20-battery-clause-applicability)More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page.
---
name: e20-battery-clause-applicability
description: "Use when determine whether the ECSS-E-ST-20C clause 5.6.1 battery provisions reach a given on-board energy store: categorize every item as a secondary rechargeable electrochemical battery, a primary non-rechargeable electrochemical battery, an electrochemical converter that holds no internal reactants, or a non-electrochemical store; resolve the declared cell assembly into nominal voltage, ampere-hour capacity and stored energy; select the provision groups that follow from the category; and reconcile the derived reach against the scope the electrical architecture declared. Trigger: ecss, e-st-20-electrical-scope, e20-battery-clause-applicability, battery-provision-applicability, electrochemical-energy-store, secondary-battery-chemistry, primary-battery-chemistry, cell-assembly-topology, battery-scope-boundary."
license: Apache-2.0
compliance: STANDARDS-REF
standards:
- id: ecss
reference-only: true
gated: false
domain: space-systems
pack: space-systems
compatibility: "agentskills.io SKILL.md; any SKILL.md host (Claude Code, Hermes, OpenClaw)"
metadata:
domain: space-systems
subdomain: ecss
tags: [ecss, e-st-20-electrical-scope, e20-battery-clause-applicability, battery-provision-applicability, electrochemical-energy-store, secondary-battery-chemistry, primary-battery-chemistry, cell-assembly-topology]
version: 0.1.0
author: Aero Agent Skills
---
# ECSS Electrical Engineering — Battery Clause Applicability (space-systems/ecss/e20-battery-clause-applicability)
Use when the task is deciding which entries of a spacecraft energy-storage
inventory are batteries in the sense of ECSS-E-ST-20C clause 5.6.1 -- an
electrochemical source that holds its own reactants and delivers electrical
energy through an assembly of cells -- and which provision groups therefore
reach each entry.
## Domain quick reference
- Clause 5.6.1 fixes two things at once: what counts as a battery, and how
far the battery provisions extend. The definition is electrochemical and
self-contained: reactants stored inside the cell, energy released by a
reversible or irreversible chemical reaction at the electrodes. A store
that converts rather than holds (a fuel cell fed from external tanks) and
a store that is not electrochemical at all (capacitor bank, flywheel,
array, radioisotope source) sit outside the clause even though both
deliver electrical energy.
- The categories that matter downstream are four. A secondary battery is
rechargeable, so charge management, cycling and energy-balance sizing all
reach it. A primary battery is single-discharge, so charge management does
not reach it while cell rating limits, safety management, storage and
handling, and telemetry still do. An electrochemical converter and a
non-electrochemical store take neither set and are governed elsewhere.
- A battery is an assembly, never a bare cell: the series count sets the
nominal terminal voltage from the per-cell nominal voltage of the
chemistry, the parallel count sets the ampere-hour capacity from the cell
capacity, and the product of the two gives the stored energy that the
power budget and the energy-balance case both consume. An in-scope item
whose assembly is not declared cannot be sized or rated and is therefore
an open item, not a pass.
- The reach decision is auditable in both directions. The architecture
declares which items it treats as batteries; the categorization derives
the same answer from chemistry. A disagreement is a finding: either a
rechargeable store escaped the battery provisions, or a non-battery store
is carrying requirements it cannot satisfy.
## Workflow
1. Take the energy-storage inventory and require a unique identifier and a
named chemistry on every entry. Reject a duplicate identifier and reject
a chemistry that is not on the recognized list before any reach decision
is made -- an unrecognized chemistry is an input defect, not a category.
2. Categorize each entry from its chemistry into exactly one of secondary
battery, primary battery, electrochemical converter, or non-electrochemical
store. Only the first two are in the reach of clause 5.6.1.
3. For each in-scope entry, resolve the declared assembly: series count,
parallel count and per-cell capacity together give nominal voltage,
ampere-hour capacity and stored energy. Treat a partially declared
assembly as an input defect and a wholly undeclared one as an open item
recorded against the entry.
4. Select the provision groups that follow from the category: charge
management, cell rating limits, energy-balance sizing, safety management,
storage and handling, and telemetry for a secondary battery; the same set
less charge management and energy-balance cycling for a primary battery;
none for the two out-of-scope categories.
5. Reconcile the derived reach against the declared reach on each entry and
record a finding wherever the two disagree. Record a further finding for
a secondary battery with no charge control identified, since the group
that most distinguishes it has no owner.
6. Aggregate per inventory: the applicability assessment is settled only
when every entry has a category, every in-scope entry has an assembly,
and the finding list is empty.
## Pitfalls
- Reading "delivers electrical energy from a chemical reaction" as enough
and pulling a fuel cell into the battery provisions -- the clause scopes a
store with internal reactants, and a converter fed from external tanks is
sized, rated and operated by a different set of requirements entirely.
- Applying the rechargeable provisions to a primary battery because both are
electrochemical -- charge current limits, charge temperature windows and
cycle-life energy balance have no meaning on a single-discharge store, and
imposing them produces requirements that can never be verified.
- Categorizing a battery and stopping there, leaving the series and parallel
counts undeclared -- without the assembly there is no nominal voltage and
no capacity, so every later clause that consumes those numbers inherits an
undeclared input.
- Trusting the architecture's own scope flag instead of deriving the
category -- the flag is the item under audit, so accepting it as the answer
makes the check circular and lets a mis-scoped store pass unexamined.
## Behavior contract (gate 3)
The categorization, assembly-resolution, provision-selection and declared-
versus-derived reconciliation logic is exercised by the gate 3 contract test:
scripts/test_e20_battery_clause_applicability.py against
scripts/e20_battery_clause_applicability_logic.py (stdlib unittest, offline).
Run: python3 scripts/test_e20_battery_clause_applicability.py
## Compliance
- ECSS standards are freely downloadable (ESA); cite the source and
paraphrase per standards-map.yaml.
- compliance: STANDARDS-REF, gated: false.
Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!