Skills DirectorySkills Directory
SkillsLearnSecurityCategoriesDocsCommunityBlog
Sign InSubmit Skill
Skills Directory

Security-tested agent skills for Claude, coding agents, and AI workflows.

Directory

  • Browse Skills
  • All Skills A–Z
  • Claude Skills
  • Claude Code Skills
  • Agent Skills
  • Categories
  • Authors
  • Submit a Skill

Learn

  • Learn Hub
  • Install Claude Skills
  • Write SKILL.md
  • Skills vs MCP
  • Directories Compared

Security

  • Security
  • Methodology
  • Secure Claude Skills
  • Security Badges

Company

  • About
  • Community
  • Blog
  • API Docs
  • Advertise

2026 Skills Directory. All rights reserved.

ProTermsPrivacyRefunds
Back to skills

E1011 Verif Test

ASecurity

Use when verify human factors engineering (HFE) requirements for a space system by ground tests and demonstrations per ECSS-E-ST-10-11C §4.11.3 and Annex D: identify each HFE requirement needing ground verification, assign a verification method (test, demonstration, analysis, or inspection), map each test or demonstration method to its Annex D event category, check that all mandatory Annex D ground events are covered, evaluate pre-event readiness criteria, and aggregate pass, fail, and pendin...

2 stars
0 votes
0 copies
0 views
Added 9/27/2026
ai-agentspythongotestingperformance

Works with

claude code

Security Analysis

A100/100

Scanned 9/27/2026

Install to Claude Code

$npx -y skills add ashfordeOU/aero-agent-skills --skill e1011-verif-test --agent claude-code

Installs into .claude/skills of the current project.

Are you the author of E1011 Verif Test?

Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.

Security grade badge for E1011 Verif Test
[![Security: A — Skills Directory](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/api/skills/ashfordeou-e1011-verif-test/badge)](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/ashfordeou-e1011-verif-test)

More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page.

Download with Pro
Files
SKILL.md
---
name: e1011-verif-test
description: "Use when verify human factors engineering (HFE) requirements for a space system by ground tests and demonstrations per ECSS-E-ST-10-11C §4.11.3 and Annex D: identify each HFE requirement needing ground verification, assign a verification method (test, demonstration, analysis, or inspection), map each test or demonstration method to its Annex D event category, check that all mandatory Annex D ground events are covered, evaluate pre-event readiness criteria, and aggregate pass, fail, and pending status across all requirements into an overall compliance determination. Trigger: ecss, e-st-10-system-scope, hfe, human-factors, ground-test, verification, annex-d, hfe-testing, ergonomics."
license: Apache-2.0
compliance: STANDARDS-REF
standards:
  - id: ecss
    reference-only: true
gated: false
domain: space-systems
pack: space-systems
compatibility: "agentskills.io SKILL.md; any SKILL.md host (Claude Code, Hermes, OpenClaw)"
metadata:
  domain: space-systems
  subdomain: ecss
  tags: [ecss, e-st-10-system-scope, hfe, human-factors, ground-test, verification, annex-d, hfe-testing, ergonomics]
  version: 0.1.0
  author: Aero Agent Skills
---

# ECSS HFE Ground Verification — Tests and Demonstrations (space-systems/ecss/e1011-verif-test)

Use when the task is to verify human factors engineering (HFE)
requirements for a crewed space system through ground tests and
demonstrations in accordance with ECSS-E-ST-10-11C §4.11.3 and its
Annex D ground-test protocol.

## Domain quick reference

- §4.11.3 requires that HFE requirements be verified through observable
  ground activities — tests (measured outcomes) or demonstrations
  (observed functional performance) — rather than analysis or inspection
  alone, when the requirement concerns crew interaction with hardware or
  software.
- Annex D defines the mandatory ground-test event categories that must
  each be covered by at least one test or demonstration before the
  verification programme is complete. The mandatory set includes:
  functional task performance, ergonomic and anthropometric assessment,
  cognitive workload measurement, display and control interface
  evaluation, and emergency procedure demonstration. Non-mandatory
  event categories (label and cue verification, maintenance task
  demonstration, environmental ergonomics) are addressed when in scope.
- Verification methods are coded T (test), D (demonstration),
  A (analysis), and I (inspection). Only T and D methods are considered
  observable and count toward covering an Annex D mandatory event; an A
  or I method alone is insufficient for requirements that require
  observable crew performance.
- Pre-event readiness criteria must be met before each Annex D event
  begins: procedures available and approved, any measurement tools or
  anthropometric fixtures calibrated, personnel qualified, and the
  relevant hardware or software version baselined.

## Workflow

1. Inventory every HFE requirement subject to ground verification and
   assign a verification method (T, D, A, or I). For each T or D
   assignment, identify the Annex D event category the activity will
   address.
2. Check structural validity of each requirement record: all mandatory
   fields present, method code recognised, and — for T or D — a valid
   Annex D event mapping present.
3. Check mandatory Annex D event coverage: confirm at least one T or D
   requirement maps to each mandatory event category. Flag every
   uncovered mandatory event as a gap finding.
4. Before each scheduled Annex D event, evaluate the readiness criteria
   checklist; record which criteria are unmet and defer the event until
   the checklist is clear.
5. Record the outcome of each event against its requirement (PASS,
   FAIL, or PENDING). A FAIL requires root-cause investigation and a
   re-test plan before the verification closure review.
6. Aggregate pass, fail, and pending counts across all requirements.
   The verification programme is compliant only when the total is
   non-zero, fail is zero, and pending is zero, and no mandatory Annex
   D event gap findings remain.

## Pitfalls

- Accepting an analysis or inspection record as coverage for a
  mandatory Annex D event — observable performance of the crew is the
  intent of §4.11.3; an A or I entry for a crew-interaction requirement
  is a gap, not a closure.
- Closing a PENDING requirement as PASS without a recorded test outcome
  — the status field must be set by an authorised event record, not by
  inference from related activities.
- Treating a partial Annex D event (executed but criteria unmet at
  start) as a valid test — readiness criteria are gate conditions;
  results obtained when the gate was not cleared are not accepted.
- Conflating coverage of non-mandatory Annex D events with mandatory
  ones — only the five mandatory event categories close the §4.11.3
  gap; additional events provide complementary evidence but do not
  substitute for missing mandatory coverage.

## Behavior contract (gate 3)

The verification-method parsing, structural validation, mandatory event
coverage check, readiness evaluation, compliance summary, and findings
aggregation logic is exercised by the gate 3 contract test:
scripts/test_e1011_verif_test.py against
scripts/e1011_verif_test_logic.py (stdlib unittest, offline). Run:
python3 scripts/test_e1011_verif_test.py

## Compliance

- ECSS standards are freely downloadable (ESA); cite the source and
  paraphrase per standards-map.yaml.
- compliance: STANDARDS-REF, gated: false.

Attribution

ashfordeOUashfordeOU
View sourceMore from ashfordeOU →
SSkills DirectorySkills Directory

Know which skills are safe — weekly.

Best new skills + every skill we flagged as malicious. From the team that scanned 103,619.

Join free

Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.

Comments (0)

No comments yet. Be the first to comment!

SSkills DirectorySkills Directory

Know which skills are safe — weekly.

Best new skills + every skill we flagged as malicious. From the team that scanned 103,619.

Join free

Related Skills

Caveman

Ultra-compressed communication mode that cuts output tokens while keeping technical accuracy. Levels: lite, full, ultra and the wenyan variants. Use for /caveman, "caveman mode", "talk like caveman", "be brief" or "less tokens".

1074701 votes

Hyperplan

Adversarial multi-agent planning skill. Self-orchestrates 5 hostile category members (unspecified-low, unspecified-high, deep, ultrabrain, artistry) via team-mode for ruthless cross-critique debate, distills only the defensible insights, then MANDATORILY hands the distilled insight bundle to the `plan` agent for executable plan formalization. Use when planning needs maximum rigor and surfacing of weak assumptions, blind spots, and over-engineering. Triggers: 'hyperplan', 'hpp', '/hyperplan', ...

694821 votes

Mcp Code Execution

Routes multi-tool workflows through MCP servers for large datasets and pipelines. Use when Bash tool overhead is limiting throughput on data-heavy tasks.

3351 votes

catchup

Recovers the conversation and failed tool calls of a previous Codex, Claude Code, Antigravity, Cline, Copilot CLI, Cursor, DeepSeek Harness, Kimi, OpenCode, Pi Agent, or ZCode session. Use when the user says "catch up", "what did the last session do", "get me up to speed", "I switched agents", asks to recover/summarize a previous session before continuing, or asks to diagnose or report a catchup failure. Do NOT use for the current conversation, git history, or any non-agent log.

691 votes

math-skill

A comprehensive mathematical reasoning skill for AI assistants — handles arithmetic to research-level problems with rigorous step-by-step reasoning, systematic verification, and transparent uncertainty handling

381 votes
View all in ai-agents →