Skills DirectorySkills Directory
SkillsLearnSecurityCategoriesDocsCommunityBlog
Sign InSubmit Skill
Skills Directory

Security-tested agent skills for Claude, coding agents, and AI workflows.

Directory

  • Browse Skills
  • All Skills A–Z
  • Claude Skills
  • Claude Code Skills
  • Agent Skills
  • Categories
  • Authors
  • Submit a Skill

Learn

  • Learn Hub
  • Install Claude Skills
  • Write SKILL.md
  • Skills vs MCP
  • Directories Compared

Security

  • Security
  • Methodology
  • Secure Claude Skills
  • Security Badges

Company

  • About
  • Community
  • Blog
  • API Docs
  • Advertise

2026 Skills Directory. All rights reserved.

ProTermsPrivacyRefunds
Back to skills

E1003 Test Docs

ASecurity

Use when producing the test documentation set required by ECSS-E-ST-10C §4.3.3: draft the Assembly, Integration and Test (AIT) plan, the Test Specification (TSPE), the Test Procedure (TPRO), and the Test Report; verify each document carries the mandatory control fields (type, issue number, date, approval status); confirm the TSPE and TPRO trace every item to a recorded test requirement; check that document sequencing is respected (AIT plan approved before TSPE is released, TSPE approved befor...

2 stars
0 votes
0 copies
0 views
Added 9/27/2026
ai-agentspythongodocumentation

Works with

claude code

Security Analysis

A100/100

Scanned 9/27/2026

Install to Claude Code

$npx -y skills add ashfordeOU/aero-agent-skills --skill e1003-test-docs --agent claude-code

Installs into .claude/skills of the current project.

Are you the author of E1003 Test Docs?

Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.

Security grade badge for E1003 Test Docs
[![Security: A — Skills Directory](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/api/skills/ashfordeou-e1003-test-docs/badge)](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/ashfordeou-e1003-test-docs)

More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page.

Download with Pro
Files
SKILL.md
---
name: e1003-test-docs
description: "Use when producing the test documentation set required by ECSS-E-ST-10C §4.3.3: draft the Assembly, Integration and Test (AIT) plan, the Test Specification (TSPE), the Test Procedure (TPRO), and the Test Report; verify each document carries the mandatory control fields (type, issue number, date, approval status); confirm the TSPE and TPRO trace every item to a recorded test requirement; check that document sequencing is respected (AIT plan approved before TSPE is released, TSPE approved before TPRO is released, TPRO approved before the Test Report is issued); and flag any missing document, broken traceability link, or sequence violation before the test campaign proceeds. Trigger: ecss, e-st-10-system-scope, test-documentation, ait-plan, tspe, tpro, test-report, document-control, traceability."
license: Apache-2.0
compliance: STANDARDS-REF
standards:
  - id: ecss
    reference-only: true
gated: false
domain: space-systems
pack: space-systems
compatibility: "agentskills.io SKILL.md; any SKILL.md host (Claude Code, Hermes, OpenClaw)"
metadata:
  domain: space-systems
  subdomain: ecss
  tags: [ecss, e-st-10-system-scope, test-documentation, ait-plan, tspe, tpro, test-report, document-control, traceability]
  version: 0.1.0
  author: Aero Agent Skills
---

# ECSS E-ST-10C — Test Documentation Set (space-systems/ecss/e1003-test-docs)

Use when the task is to produce and control the test documentation set
required by ECSS-E-ST-10C §4.3.3 — defining the AIT plan, the Test
Specification (TSPE), the Test Procedure (TPRO), and the Test Report,
and verifying that the set is complete, traceable, and sequenced before
the test campaign begins.

## Domain quick reference

- §4.3.3 mandates four document types for any test campaign: the AIT
  plan (schedules and resources the campaign), the TSPE (specifies what
  to test and the pass/fail criteria), the TPRO (step-by-step execution
  instructions), and the Test Report (records results and dispositions).
  Each document type belongs to exactly one category within the set;
  a set that omits any of the four is incomplete.
- Every document must carry document-control fields: a type identifier,
  an issue number (positive integer), an issue date, and an approval
  status drawn from DRAFT, APPROVED, RELEASED, or SUPERSEDED. A
  document without a valid issue number or date has not entered
  configuration control and cannot gate a test campaign.
- Traceability is required for the TSPE and TPRO: each must reference
  at least one recorded test requirement by identifier. The AIT plan
  and Test Report are not required to carry forward requirement traces,
  but the TSPE must establish them and the TPRO must inherit them.
  A TSPE or TPRO with no trace entries is a traceability gap.
- Document sequencing follows the campaign lifecycle: the AIT plan must
  reach APPROVED status before the TSPE is released; the TSPE must
  reach APPROVED before the TPRO is released; the TPRO must reach
  APPROVED before the Test Report is issued. Releasing a downstream
  document while its predecessor is still in DRAFT is a sequence
  violation, not merely an advisory.

## Workflow

1. Inventory the planned test campaign and confirm which of the four
   document types (AIT_PLAN, TSPE, TPRO, TEST_REPORT) are present in
   the documentation set. Record any type that is absent; the set is
   not ready for the sequence check until all four are accounted for.
2. For each document, verify the document-control fields: confirm the
   type identifier matches a recognized value, the issue number is a
   positive integer, the date is populated, and the status is one of
   DRAFT, APPROVED, RELEASED, or SUPERSEDED. Flag any document that
   fails these checks before proceeding.
3. Check traceability for the TSPE and TPRO: each must list at least
   one requirement identifier, and every listed identifier must appear
   in the approved test-requirements register. Flag a document with an
   empty trace list or with a trace pointing to an unregistered
   identifier.
4. Evaluate document sequencing: confirm the AIT plan is at APPROVED
   or later before the TSPE is at RELEASED or later; confirm the TSPE
   is at APPROVED or later before the TPRO is at RELEASED or later;
   confirm the TPRO is at APPROVED or later before the Test Report is
   at RELEASED or later. Record any predecessor-not-ready violation.
5. Aggregate all findings by document type. A test documentation set
   is compliant only when the missing-document list is empty, every
   document passes its field and traceability checks, and no sequence
   violation is recorded.

## Pitfalls

- Treating an incomplete set as ready because the available documents
  are individually valid — a campaign cannot start without all four
  document types, regardless of the status of those already present.
- Accepting a TSPE or TPRO with trace entries that do not appear in the
  registered test-requirements list — a dangling trace is as problematic
  as no trace because it cannot be verified against a recorded
  requirement.
- Reading "no sequence violation" as compliant when a predecessor
  document is absent entirely — if the AIT plan does not exist, the
  TSPE cannot be sequenced against it, and the absence is itself a
  finding.
- Treating DRAFT status as equivalent to APPROVED for sequencing
  purposes — a predecessor in DRAFT has not been formally reviewed and
  cannot gate the release of a downstream document.

## Behavior contract (gate 3)

The document-completeness, field-validation, traceability, and
sequence-readiness logic is exercised by the gate 3 contract test:
scripts/test_e1003_test_docs.py against
scripts/e1003_test_docs_logic.py (stdlib unittest, offline). Run:
python3 scripts/test_e1003_test_docs.py

## Compliance

- ECSS standards are freely downloadable (ESA); cite the source and
  paraphrase per standards-map.yaml.
- compliance: STANDARDS-REF, gated: false.

Attribution

ashfordeOUashfordeOU
View sourceMore from ashfordeOU →
SSkills DirectorySkills Directory

Know which skills are safe — weekly.

Best new skills + every skill we flagged as malicious. From the team that scanned 103,619.

Join free

Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.

Comments (0)

No comments yet. Be the first to comment!

SSkills DirectorySkills Directory

Know which skills are safe — weekly.

Best new skills + every skill we flagged as malicious. From the team that scanned 103,619.

Join free

Related Skills

Caveman

Ultra-compressed communication mode that cuts output tokens while keeping technical accuracy. Levels: lite, full, ultra and the wenyan variants. Use for /caveman, "caveman mode", "talk like caveman", "be brief" or "less tokens".

1074701 votes

Hyperplan

Adversarial multi-agent planning skill. Self-orchestrates 5 hostile category members (unspecified-low, unspecified-high, deep, ultrabrain, artistry) via team-mode for ruthless cross-critique debate, distills only the defensible insights, then MANDATORILY hands the distilled insight bundle to the `plan` agent for executable plan formalization. Use when planning needs maximum rigor and surfacing of weak assumptions, blind spots, and over-engineering. Triggers: 'hyperplan', 'hpp', '/hyperplan', ...

694821 votes

Mcp Code Execution

Routes multi-tool workflows through MCP servers for large datasets and pipelines. Use when Bash tool overhead is limiting throughput on data-heavy tasks.

3351 votes

catchup

Recovers the conversation and failed tool calls of a previous Codex, Claude Code, Antigravity, Cline, Copilot CLI, Cursor, DeepSeek Harness, Kimi, OpenCode, Pi Agent, or ZCode session. Use when the user says "catch up", "what did the last session do", "get me up to speed", "I switched agents", asks to recover/summarize a previous session before continuing, or asks to diagnose or report a catchup failure. Do NOT use for the current conversation, git history, or any non-agent log.

691 votes

math-skill

A comprehensive mathematical reasoning skill for AI assistants — handles arithmetic to research-level problems with rigorous step-by-step reasoning, systematic verification, and transparent uncertainty handling

381 votes
View all in ai-agents →