Use when define the element protoflight test baseline under ECSS-E-ST-10-03C §6.4: decide whether a space element must follow the protoflight test approach (one hardware model demonstrating both design qualification and flight acceptance, with no separate dedicated qualification model), and derive, for each required test type, the protoflight test level from the Table 6-5 qualification severities and the protoflight test duration from the Table 6-6 acceptance durations. Also flag any protofli...
Scanned 9/27/2026
Install to Claude Code
npx -y skills add ashfordeOU/aero-agent-skills --skill e1003-el-protoflight --agent claude-codeInstalls into .claude/skills of the current project.
Are you the author of E1003 El Protoflight?
Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/ashfordeou-e1003-el-protoflight)More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page.
---
name: e1003-el-protoflight
description: "Use when define the element protoflight test baseline under ECSS-E-ST-10-03C §6.4: decide whether a space element must follow the protoflight test approach (one hardware model demonstrating both design qualification and flight acceptance, with no separate dedicated qualification model), and derive, for each required test type, the protoflight test level from the Table 6-5 qualification severities and the protoflight test duration from the Table 6-6 acceptance durations. Also flag any protoflight baseline entry whose level or duration deviates from the standard qualification-level/acceptance-duration rule without a documented engineering deviation. Trigger: ecss, e-st-10-system-scope, protoflight, element-testing, test-levels, test-durations, Table-6-5, Table-6-6, qualification-baseline, acceptance-baseline."
license: Apache-2.0
compliance: STANDARDS-REF
standards:
- id: ecss
reference-only: true
gated: false
domain: space-systems
pack: space-systems
compatibility: "agentskills.io SKILL.md; any SKILL.md host (Claude Code, Hermes, OpenClaw)"
metadata:
domain: space-systems
subdomain: ecss
tags: [ecss, e-st-10-system-scope, protoflight, element-testing, test-levels, test-durations, qualification-baseline]
version: 0.1.0
author: Aero Agent Skills
---
# ECSS Element Protoflight Test Baseline (space-systems/ecss/e1003-el-protoflight)
Use when the task is defining the element protoflight test baseline
under ECSS-E-ST-10-03C §6.4: deciding which test approach a space
element follows, and deriving the protoflight test level and duration
for each applicable test type ahead of test specification and test
procedure drafting.
## Domain quick reference
- ECSS-E-ST-10-03C §6.4 defines the protoflight test approach at the
element level: when a single element model must serve as both the
design qualification article and the flight article (no separate,
dedicated qualification model is produced), that element follows a
protoflight test baseline instead of running a full qualification
campaign on one model and a separate acceptance campaign on another.
- Table 6-5 tabulates, per test type (for example mechanical vibration,
thermal vacuum, thermal cycling, shock, EMC), the qualification-level
and acceptance-level test severities: the qualification level carries
more margin above the predicted flight environment than the
acceptance level.
- Table 6-6 tabulates, per test type, the associated qualification and
acceptance test durations or cycle counts: the qualification duration
is longer than the acceptance duration.
- The protoflight baseline rule combines the two tables: the
protoflight test level for a test type is set at the qualification
level, while the protoflight test duration is set at the (shorter)
acceptance duration. This demonstrates qualification-level design
margin without exposing the flight element to the full qualification
duration, which would induce excess wear-out or fatigue on an article
that still has to fly.
- A protoflight baseline entry that departs from this level/duration
combination is a deviation and requires a documented engineering
rationale — it cannot be substituted silently. An element with a
dedicated qualification model does not use the protoflight baseline
at all; it keeps separate qualification and acceptance campaigns.
## Workflow
1. For each element, determine its test approach: protoflight when no
dedicated qualification model exists (the same hardware demonstrates
qualification and then flies), otherwise qualification-and-acceptance
(separate models, standard campaigns).
2. For each applicable test type on a protoflight element, capture its
Table 6-5 qualification level and acceptance level, and its Table
6-6 qualification duration and acceptance duration. Reject a spec
where the qualification level is below the acceptance level or the
qualification duration is below the acceptance duration —
qualification must carry more margin and more exposure than
acceptance, not less.
3. Derive the protoflight baseline for the test type: level =
qualification level, duration = acceptance duration.
4. Build the full baseline matrix across every required test type for
the element; reject a duplicate test type entry and report any
required test type still missing from the matrix.
5. When a proposed baseline entry is supplied from elsewhere (for
example a test specification already in draft), compare it against
the standard-rule baseline derived from the same spec; flag any
entry whose level or duration does not match unless the test type
already has a recorded, approved deviation.
6. Before declaring an element ready for protoflight testing, confirm
it is categorized as following the protoflight approach and that its
baseline matrix has no missing required test types.
## Pitfalls
- Applying the protoflight baseline (qualification level, acceptance
duration) to an element that actually has a dedicated qualification
model — that element should run separate qualification and acceptance
campaigns, not a blended baseline.
- Accepting a test spec where the qualification severity or duration is
weaker than the acceptance one — that inverts the margin relationship
the baseline rule depends on.
- Silently substituting a different level or duration than the standard
rule produces instead of flagging it as a deviation needing documented
justification.
- Declaring an element ready for protoflight testing while a required
test type is still missing from its baseline matrix.
## Behavior contract (gate 3)
The approach-determination, spec-validation, baseline-derivation,
matrix-completeness, and deviation-flagging logic is exercised by the
gate 3 contract test: scripts/test_e1003_el_protoflight.py against
scripts/e1003_el_protoflight_logic.py (stdlib unittest, offline). Run:
python3 scripts/test_e1003_el_protoflight.py
## Compliance
- ECSS standards are freely downloadable (ESA); cite the source and
paraphrase per standards-map.yaml.
- compliance: STANDARDS-REF, gated: false.
Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!