Use when maintaining ECSS-E-ST-10C requirements under configuration control (clause 5.2.3.8): determine whether a requirement's lifecycle state transition (draft, proposed, baselined, obsolete) is allowed, verify that a change to a baselined requirement carries an approved change request before it is applied, assess the change's impact on derived requirements found via the parent-child traceability link and on verification items linked to the requirement, and confirm the impact assessment and...
Scanned 9/27/2026
Install to Claude Code
npx -y skills add ashfordeOU/aero-agent-skills --skill e10-req-maintenance --agent claude-codeInstalls into .claude/skills of the current project.
Are you the author of E10 Req Maintenance?
Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/ashfordeou-e10-req-maintenance)More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page.
---
name: e10-req-maintenance
description: "Use when maintaining ECSS-E-ST-10C requirements under configuration control (clause 5.2.3.8): determine whether a requirement's lifecycle state transition (draft, proposed, baselined, obsolete) is allowed, verify that a change to a baselined requirement carries an approved change request before it is applied, assess the change's impact on derived requirements found via the parent-child traceability link and on verification items linked to the requirement, and confirm the impact assessment and a maintenance record are captured before the change is closed. Trigger: ecss, e-st-10c, requirement maintenance, configuration control, change impact assessment, derived requirements, verification impact, baseline change request."
license: Apache-2.0
compliance: STANDARDS-REF
standards:
- id: ecss
reference-only: true
gated: false
domain: space-systems
pack: space-systems
compatibility: "agentskills.io SKILL.md; any SKILL.md host (Claude Code, Hermes, OpenClaw)"
metadata:
domain: space-systems
subdomain: ecss
tags: [ecss, e-st-10c, requirement-maintenance, configuration-control, change-impact-assessment, traceability, verification-impact]
version: 0.1.0
author: Aero Agent Skills
---
# ECSS System Engineering — Requirement Maintenance (space-systems/ecss/e10-req-maintenance)
Use when the task is maintaining requirements under configuration
control per ECSS-E-ST-10C clause 5.2.3.8 -- checking that a
requirement's lifecycle state transition is allowed, that a change to
a baselined requirement is backed by an approved change request, and
that the change's impact on derived requirements and linked
verification items has been assessed and recorded before the change
is closed.
## Domain quick reference
- A requirement moves through four lifecycle states: draft (freely
editable), proposed (under review), baselined (under configuration
control), and obsolete (terminal, superseded or withdrawn). Only
specific transitions are allowed: draft -> proposed or obsolete;
proposed -> draft (rejected back to authoring), baselined, or
obsolete; baselined -> obsolete; obsolete has no outgoing
transition. Any other pair is a disallowed transition.
- Configuration control applies once a requirement is baselined: a
baselined requirement's content may only be modified alongside an
approved change request. A draft or proposed requirement is not yet
under configuration control and can be edited directly.
- A requirement change has two possible ripple effects that must be
traced before the change is closed: derived requirements (children
linked to the changed requirement through the parent-child
traceability record) that may need re-derivation or re-review, and
verification items (test, analysis, review, or inspection activities
linked to the requirement) that may need re-verification. Either
list can be empty for a given requirement, but a nonempty list means
the impact is real and must be assessed, not just discovered.
- A closed change on a baselined requirement leaves two records: the
impact assessment (what was checked, evaluated against the
traceability and verification links) and the maintenance record
(the change history entry itself). Both are separate from the
approved-change-request gate that authorizes touching the baseline
in the first place.
## Workflow
1. Confirm the requirement's current lifecycle state is a recognized
one (draft, proposed, baselined, obsolete) and that the intended
target state is reachable by an allowed transition; reject a
transition that is not on the allowed list.
2. If the requirement is being modified and its current state is
baselined, confirm an approved change request is on record before
proceeding; flag the change if the requirement is baselined and
under modification without one.
3. Look up the requirement's derived requirements via the parent-child
traceability link and its linked verification items; this is the
change impact assessment for the requirement.
4. If either the derived-requirement list or the verification-item
list is nonempty, confirm the change record documents that the
impact was assessed; flag a missing impact assessment when there is
real impact but no assessment recorded.
5. If the requirement is baselined and being modified, confirm a
maintenance record (change history entry) exists; flag its absence.
6. Aggregate the configuration-control, impact-assessment, and
maintenance-record findings; the change is not maintenance-compliant
until all three lists are empty.
## Pitfalls
- Allowing an edit to a baselined requirement because "it's a small
change" without an approved change request -- clause 5.2.3.8 gates
on configuration-control status, not change size; baselined always
requires the change request.
- Treating an empty derived-requirements list as proof no impact
assessment is needed on the verification side, or vice versa --
the two impact channels are independent; a requirement can have
linked verification items with no derived children, or the reverse.
- Recording the change history entry and calling the change complete
without a documented impact assessment -- the maintenance record and
the impact assessment are separate artifacts; having one does not
imply the other was done.
- Skipping the lifecycle transition check for a requirement moving
straight from draft to baselined, or from obsolete back to any other
state -- both are disallowed transitions under this leaf's model and
must be rejected before any configuration-control or impact logic
runs.
## Behavior contract (gate 3)
The lifecycle-transition, configuration-control, change-impact-
assessment, and maintenance-record logic is exercised by the gate 3
contract test: scripts/test_e10_req_maintenance.py against
scripts/e10_req_maintenance_logic.py (stdlib unittest, offline). Run:
python3 scripts/test_e10_req_maintenance.py
## Compliance
- ECSS standards are freely downloadable (ESA); cite the source and
paraphrase per standards-map.yaml.
- compliance: STANDARDS-REF, gated: false.
Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!