Skills DirectorySkills Directory
SkillsLearnSecurityCategoriesDocsCommunityBlog
Sign InSubmit Skill
Skills Directory

Security-tested agent skills for Claude, coding agents, and AI workflows.

Directory

  • Browse Skills
  • All Skills A–Z
  • Claude Skills
  • Claude Code Skills
  • Agent Skills
  • Categories
  • Authors
  • Submit a Skill

Learn

  • Learn Hub
  • Install Claude Skills
  • Write SKILL.md
  • Skills vs MCP
  • Directories Compared

Security

  • Security
  • Methodology
  • Secure Claude Skills
  • Security Badges

Company

  • About
  • Community
  • Blog
  • API Docs
  • Advertise

2026 Skills Directory. All rights reserved.

ProTermsPrivacyRefunds
Back to skills

E10 Delivery Per Review

ASecurity

Use when planning or checking which systems-engineering documents a space project must deliver or re-baseline at each review milestone per ECSS-E-ST-10C Annex A (informative): build the document-by-review delivery schedule, verify a given review's deliveries against it (missing and unplanned deliveries), and roll up readiness across the whole review sequence. Trigger: delivery schedule, document delivery per review, Annex A, review deliverables, MDR PRR SRR PDR CDR QR AR FRR CRR ER documents,...

2 stars
0 votes
0 copies
0 views
Added 9/27/2026
ai-agentspythongit

Works with

claude code

Security Analysis

A100/100

Scanned 9/27/2026

Install to Claude Code

$npx -y skills add ashfordeOU/aero-agent-skills --skill e10-delivery-per-review --agent claude-code

Installs into .claude/skills of the current project.

Are you the author of E10 Delivery Per Review?

Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.

Security grade badge for E10 Delivery Per Review
[![Security: A — Skills Directory](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/api/skills/ashfordeou-e10-delivery-per-review/badge)](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/ashfordeou-e10-delivery-per-review)

More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page.

Download with Pro
Files
SKILL.md
---
name: e10-delivery-per-review
description: "Use when planning or checking which systems-engineering documents a space project must deliver or re-baseline at each review milestone per ECSS-E-ST-10C Annex A (informative): build the document-by-review delivery schedule, verify a given review's deliveries against it (missing and unplanned deliveries), and roll up readiness across the whole review sequence. Trigger: delivery schedule, document delivery per review, Annex A, review deliverables, MDR PRR SRR PDR CDR QR AR FRR CRR ER documents, ECSS-E-ST-10C Annex A."
license: Apache-2.0
compliance: STANDARDS-REF
standards:
  - id: ecss
    reference-only: true
gated: false
domain: space-systems
pack: space-systems
compatibility: "agentskills.io SKILL.md; any SKILL.md host (Claude Code, Hermes, OpenClaw)"
metadata:
  domain: space-systems
  subdomain: ecss
  tags: [ecss, e-st-10c, annex-a, delivery-schedule, review, document-management]
  version: 0.1.0
  author: Aero Agent Skills
---

# ECSS SE Document Delivery Per Review (space-systems/ecss/e10-delivery-per-review)

Use when the task is planning or checking the systems-engineering (SE)
document delivery schedule for a space project under ECSS-E-ST-10C
Annex A (informative): which SE documents must be delivered or
re-baselined at which review milestone, and whether an actual review's
deliveries satisfy that schedule.

## Domain quick reference

- ECSS-E-ST-10C Annex A is an informative table mapping SE documents
  (e.g. mission description, SEP, specification tree, technical
  specifications, interface control documents, verification/technical
  budget reports) to the review milestones at which each is due,
  either as a first delivery or a re-baseline/update.
- The review milestones follow the sibling systems-engineering leaf's
  phase-gate sequence: MDR, PRR, SRR, PDR, CDR, QR, AR, FRR, CRR, ER.
- Being informative, Annex A is guidance for tailoring a project's own
  document delivery schedule, not a fixed mandatory checklist -- a
  project's schedule is the authoritative record this leaf checks
  against, not the Annex A table itself.
- A document can be due at more than one review (first issue at one
  gate, re-baseline at later gates); the schedule is a document x
  review applicability matrix, not a one-to-one mapping.

## Workflow

1. Build the project's delivery schedule: for each SE document, record
   the set of review milestones at which it must be delivered or
   re-baselined (tailored from Annex A, agreed with the customer).
2. Before a given review, list the documents the schedule requires for
   that review.
3. Compare against the documents actually delivered for that review:
   - missing deliveries: scheduled for the review but not delivered.
   - unplanned deliveries: delivered for the review but not scheduled
     (flag for review -- may be a legitimate addition or a schedule
     gap).
4. A review's delivery is complete only when there are no missing
   deliveries (unplanned deliveries do not block completeness but
   must be reconciled into the schedule).
5. Roll up across the full review sequence: report which reviews are
   complete and which still have missing deliveries, to see delivery
   readiness across the whole program.

## Pitfalls

- Treating Annex A's informative table as a mandatory universal
  checklist instead of tailoring it into the project's own schedule.
- Missing that a document is due again as a re-baseline at a later
  review, not just once at its first-issue review.
- Blocking a review on an unplanned (extra) delivery instead of only
  on missing scheduled deliveries.
- Confusing this leaf's document-delivery check with the sibling
  systems-engineering leaf's review-gate/phase-exit readiness, which
  checks that reviews themselves are completed, not that documents
  were delivered on schedule.

## Behavior contract (gate 3)

The delivery-schedule and review-readiness logic is exercised by the
gate 3 contract test: scripts/test_e10_delivery_per_review.py against
scripts/e10_delivery_per_review_logic.py (stdlib unittest, offline).
Run:
python3 scripts/test_e10_delivery_per_review.py

## Compliance

- ECSS standards are freely downloadable (ESA); cite the source and
  paraphrase per standards-map.yaml.
- compliance: STANDARDS-REF, gated: false.

Attribution

ashfordeOUashfordeOU
View sourceMore from ashfordeOU →
SSkills DirectorySkills Directory

Know which skills are safe — weekly.

Best new skills + every skill we flagged as malicious. From the team that scanned 103,619.

Join free

Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.

Comments (0)

No comments yet. Be the first to comment!

SSkills DirectorySkills Directory

Know which skills are safe — weekly.

Best new skills + every skill we flagged as malicious. From the team that scanned 103,619.

Join free

Related Skills

Caveman

Ultra-compressed communication mode that cuts output tokens while keeping technical accuracy. Levels: lite, full, ultra and the wenyan variants. Use for /caveman, "caveman mode", "talk like caveman", "be brief" or "less tokens".

1074701 votes

Hyperplan

Adversarial multi-agent planning skill. Self-orchestrates 5 hostile category members (unspecified-low, unspecified-high, deep, ultrabrain, artistry) via team-mode for ruthless cross-critique debate, distills only the defensible insights, then MANDATORILY hands the distilled insight bundle to the `plan` agent for executable plan formalization. Use when planning needs maximum rigor and surfacing of weak assumptions, blind spots, and over-engineering. Triggers: 'hyperplan', 'hpp', '/hyperplan', ...

694821 votes

Mcp Code Execution

Routes multi-tool workflows through MCP servers for large datasets and pipelines. Use when Bash tool overhead is limiting throughput on data-heavy tasks.

3351 votes

catchup

Recovers the conversation and failed tool calls of a previous Codex, Claude Code, Antigravity, Cline, Copilot CLI, Cursor, DeepSeek Harness, Kimi, OpenCode, Pi Agent, or ZCode session. Use when the user says "catch up", "what did the last session do", "get me up to speed", "I switched agents", asks to recover/summarize a previous session before continuing, or asks to diagnose or report a catchup failure. Do NOT use for the current conversation, git history, or any non-agent log.

691 votes

math-skill

A comprehensive mathematical reasoning skill for AI assistants — handles arithmetic to research-level problems with rigorous step-by-step reasoning, systematic verification, and transparent uncertainty handling

381 votes
View all in ai-agents →