Skills DirectorySkills Directory
SkillsLearnSecurityCategoriesDocsCommunityBlog
Sign InSubmit Skill
Skills Directory

Security-tested agent skills for Claude, coding agents, and AI workflows.

Directory

  • Browse Skills
  • All Skills A–Z
  • Claude Skills
  • Claude Code Skills
  • Agent Skills
  • Categories
  • Authors
  • Submit a Skill

Learn

  • Learn Hub
  • Install Claude Skills
  • Write SKILL.md
  • Skills vs MCP
  • Directories Compared

Security

  • Security
  • Methodology
  • Secure Claude Skills
  • Security Badges

Company

  • About
  • Community
  • Blog
  • API Docs
  • Advertise

2026 Skills Directory. All rights reserved.

ProTermsPrivacyRefunds
Back to skills

E10 Config Baselines

ASecurity

Use when establishing the functional, allocated, or product configuration baseline for a space system under ECSS-E-ST-10C clause 5.4.2.2: classify the baseline type, confirm every earlier baseline in the functional-then-allocated-then-product sequence is already established, verify the gating milestone review (SRR for functional, PDR for allocated, CDR for product) has passed, check that the baseline's required configuration-management artifacts are on record, and aggregate the findings per b...

2 stars
0 votes
0 copies
0 views
Added 9/27/2026
ai-agentspythongitdocumentation

Works with

claude code

Security Analysis

A100/100

Scanned 9/27/2026

Install to Claude Code

$npx -y skills add ashfordeOU/aero-agent-skills --skill e10-config-baselines --agent claude-code

Installs into .claude/skills of the current project.

Are you the author of E10 Config Baselines?

Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.

Security grade badge for E10 Config Baselines
[![Security: A — Skills Directory](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/api/skills/ashfordeou-e10-config-baselines/badge)](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/ashfordeou-e10-config-baselines)

More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page.

Download with Pro
Files
SKILL.md
---
name: e10-config-baselines
description: "Use when establishing the functional, allocated, or product configuration baseline for a space system under ECSS-E-ST-10C clause 5.4.2.2: classify the baseline type, confirm every earlier baseline in the functional-then-allocated-then-product sequence is already established, verify the gating milestone review (SRR for functional, PDR for allocated, CDR for product) has passed, check that the baseline's required configuration-management artifacts are on record, and aggregate the findings per baseline type so a program-level compliance status can be derived. Trigger: ecss, e-st-10-system-scope, configuration baseline, functional baseline, allocated baseline, product baseline, m-st-40, srr, pdr, cdr, configuration management milestones."
license: Apache-2.0
compliance: STANDARDS-REF
standards:
  - id: ecss
    reference-only: true
gated: false
domain: space-systems
pack: space-systems
compatibility: "agentskills.io SKILL.md; any SKILL.md host (Claude Code, Hermes, OpenClaw)"
metadata:
  domain: space-systems
  subdomain: ecss
  tags: [ecss, e-st-10-system-scope, configuration-baseline, functional-baseline, allocated-baseline, product-baseline, m-st-40]
  version: 0.1.0
  author: Aero Agent Skills
---

# ECSS System Engineering — Configuration Baselines (space-systems/ecss/e10-config-baselines)

Use when the task is establishing a configuration baseline under
ECSS-E-ST-10C clause 5.4.2.2 -- determining whether the functional,
allocated, or product baseline for a space system can be established
at its correct program milestone, in the correct sequence, with the
configuration-management record it requires.

## Domain quick reference

- Clause 5.4.2.2 defines three configuration baselines established in
  a fixed sequence, each capturing a successively more detailed layer
  of the system definition: functional (the top-level requirements and
  functional interfaces), allocated (those requirements allocated down
  to each configuration item, plus the interfaces between them), and
  product (the build-to design and as-built record for each
  configuration item). A baseline may only be established once every
  earlier baseline in the sequence already exists -- there is no
  allocated baseline without a functional one, and no product baseline
  without both.
- Each baseline is gated by a program milestone review: the functional
  baseline by the system requirements review (SRR), the allocated
  baseline by the preliminary design review (PDR), and the product
  baseline by the critical design review (CDR). Establishing a
  baseline before its gating review has passed is out of sequence with
  the milestone plan under M-ST-40, regardless of whether the
  supporting documents exist.
- Each baseline also carries a minimum configuration-management record
  it must hold before it can be considered established: the functional
  baseline needs the top-level requirements document and the
  functional interface specification; the allocated baseline needs the
  per-configuration-item requirements and the interface control
  documents; the product baseline needs the build-to documentation,
  the as-built configuration list, and the verification close-out
  record. A baseline with its milestone passed but a document missing
  is not yet established -- the review flags the specific gap rather
  than treating "milestone passed" as sufficient.

## Workflow

1. Identify the baseline type under review (functional, allocated, or
   product). Reject a type outside this set before assessing it
   further.
2. Check sequence: confirm every baseline earlier than this one is
   already established. Flag the specific missing prior baseline(s)
   rather than a generic "not ready".
3. Check the milestone gate: confirm the baseline's required review
   (SRR / PDR / CDR) has passed. Flag the baseline against its
   specific required milestone when it has not.
4. Check the artifact record: confirm every required
   configuration-management artifact for this baseline type is on
   file. Flag the specific missing artifact ids.
5. Aggregate the three checks per baseline type; a baseline is ready
   to establish only when all three checks return no findings.
6. Across the program, evaluate all three baseline types together --
   an early-program state should show findings only on the baselines
   whose turn has not yet come, not spurious findings on a baseline
   that is already legitimately established.

## Pitfalls

- Treating a passed milestone review as sufficient on its own --
   clause 5.4.2.2 also requires the artifact record and the sequence
   position; a baseline with a passed CDR but no as-built configuration
   list is not yet an established product baseline.
- Allowing a later baseline to be established out of sequence because
   its own milestone has passed (e.g. PDR passed but SRR was skipped) --
   the allocated baseline cannot exist without the functional baseline
   underneath it, independent of which reviews happened to occur.
- Confusing the milestone that gates a baseline with the milestone
   that confirms it -- SRR/PDR/CDR gate the functional/allocated/
   product baselines respectively; downstream reviews (e.g. QR, AR)
   confirm readiness for later program stages and are out of scope for
   this leaf's gate check.
- Reading an empty missing-artifacts list as "fully compliant" when the
   sequence or milestone check already failed -- all three checks are
   independent findings and must all be clear, not just the last one
   evaluated.

## Behavior contract (gate 3)

The baseline-type validation, sequence, milestone-gate, and artifact
logic is exercised by the gate 3 contract test:
scripts/test_e10_config_baselines.py against
scripts/e10_config_baselines_logic.py (stdlib unittest, offline). Run:
python3 scripts/test_e10_config_baselines.py

## Compliance

- ECSS standards are freely downloadable (ESA); cite the source and
  paraphrase per standards-map.yaml.
- compliance: STANDARDS-REF, gated: false.

Attribution

ashfordeOUashfordeOU
View sourceMore from ashfordeOU →
SSkills DirectorySkills Directory

Know which skills are safe — weekly.

Best new skills + every skill we flagged as malicious. From the team that scanned 103,619.

Join free

Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.

Comments (0)

No comments yet. Be the first to comment!

SSkills DirectorySkills Directory

Know which skills are safe — weekly.

Best new skills + every skill we flagged as malicious. From the team that scanned 103,619.

Join free

Related Skills

Caveman

Ultra-compressed communication mode that cuts output tokens while keeping technical accuracy. Levels: lite, full, ultra and the wenyan variants. Use for /caveman, "caveman mode", "talk like caveman", "be brief" or "less tokens".

1074701 votes

Hyperplan

Adversarial multi-agent planning skill. Self-orchestrates 5 hostile category members (unspecified-low, unspecified-high, deep, ultrabrain, artistry) via team-mode for ruthless cross-critique debate, distills only the defensible insights, then MANDATORILY hands the distilled insight bundle to the `plan` agent for executable plan formalization. Use when planning needs maximum rigor and surfacing of weak assumptions, blind spots, and over-engineering. Triggers: 'hyperplan', 'hpp', '/hyperplan', ...

694821 votes

Mcp Code Execution

Routes multi-tool workflows through MCP servers for large datasets and pipelines. Use when Bash tool overhead is limiting throughput on data-heavy tasks.

3351 votes

catchup

Recovers the conversation and failed tool calls of a previous Codex, Claude Code, Antigravity, Cline, Copilot CLI, Cursor, DeepSeek Harness, Kimi, OpenCode, Pi Agent, or ZCode session. Use when the user says "catch up", "what did the last session do", "get me up to speed", "I switched agents", asks to recover/summarize a previous session before continuing, or asks to diagnose or report a catchup failure. Do NOT use for the current conversation, git history, or any non-agent log.

691 votes

math-skill

A comprehensive mathematical reasoning skill for AI assistants — handles arithmetic to research-level problems with rigorous step-by-step reasoning, systematic verification, and transparent uncertainty handling

381 votes
View all in ai-agents →