Use when establishing the functional, allocated, or product configuration baseline for a space system under ECSS-E-ST-10C clause 5.4.2.2: classify the baseline type, confirm every earlier baseline in the functional-then-allocated-then-product sequence is already established, verify the gating milestone review (SRR for functional, PDR for allocated, CDR for product) has passed, check that the baseline's required configuration-management artifacts are on record, and aggregate the findings per b...
Scanned 9/27/2026
Install to Claude Code
npx -y skills add ashfordeOU/aero-agent-skills --skill e10-config-baselines --agent claude-codeInstalls into .claude/skills of the current project.
Are you the author of E10 Config Baselines?
Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/ashfordeou-e10-config-baselines)More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page.
---
name: e10-config-baselines
description: "Use when establishing the functional, allocated, or product configuration baseline for a space system under ECSS-E-ST-10C clause 5.4.2.2: classify the baseline type, confirm every earlier baseline in the functional-then-allocated-then-product sequence is already established, verify the gating milestone review (SRR for functional, PDR for allocated, CDR for product) has passed, check that the baseline's required configuration-management artifacts are on record, and aggregate the findings per baseline type so a program-level compliance status can be derived. Trigger: ecss, e-st-10-system-scope, configuration baseline, functional baseline, allocated baseline, product baseline, m-st-40, srr, pdr, cdr, configuration management milestones."
license: Apache-2.0
compliance: STANDARDS-REF
standards:
- id: ecss
reference-only: true
gated: false
domain: space-systems
pack: space-systems
compatibility: "agentskills.io SKILL.md; any SKILL.md host (Claude Code, Hermes, OpenClaw)"
metadata:
domain: space-systems
subdomain: ecss
tags: [ecss, e-st-10-system-scope, configuration-baseline, functional-baseline, allocated-baseline, product-baseline, m-st-40]
version: 0.1.0
author: Aero Agent Skills
---
# ECSS System Engineering — Configuration Baselines (space-systems/ecss/e10-config-baselines)
Use when the task is establishing a configuration baseline under
ECSS-E-ST-10C clause 5.4.2.2 -- determining whether the functional,
allocated, or product baseline for a space system can be established
at its correct program milestone, in the correct sequence, with the
configuration-management record it requires.
## Domain quick reference
- Clause 5.4.2.2 defines three configuration baselines established in
a fixed sequence, each capturing a successively more detailed layer
of the system definition: functional (the top-level requirements and
functional interfaces), allocated (those requirements allocated down
to each configuration item, plus the interfaces between them), and
product (the build-to design and as-built record for each
configuration item). A baseline may only be established once every
earlier baseline in the sequence already exists -- there is no
allocated baseline without a functional one, and no product baseline
without both.
- Each baseline is gated by a program milestone review: the functional
baseline by the system requirements review (SRR), the allocated
baseline by the preliminary design review (PDR), and the product
baseline by the critical design review (CDR). Establishing a
baseline before its gating review has passed is out of sequence with
the milestone plan under M-ST-40, regardless of whether the
supporting documents exist.
- Each baseline also carries a minimum configuration-management record
it must hold before it can be considered established: the functional
baseline needs the top-level requirements document and the
functional interface specification; the allocated baseline needs the
per-configuration-item requirements and the interface control
documents; the product baseline needs the build-to documentation,
the as-built configuration list, and the verification close-out
record. A baseline with its milestone passed but a document missing
is not yet established -- the review flags the specific gap rather
than treating "milestone passed" as sufficient.
## Workflow
1. Identify the baseline type under review (functional, allocated, or
product). Reject a type outside this set before assessing it
further.
2. Check sequence: confirm every baseline earlier than this one is
already established. Flag the specific missing prior baseline(s)
rather than a generic "not ready".
3. Check the milestone gate: confirm the baseline's required review
(SRR / PDR / CDR) has passed. Flag the baseline against its
specific required milestone when it has not.
4. Check the artifact record: confirm every required
configuration-management artifact for this baseline type is on
file. Flag the specific missing artifact ids.
5. Aggregate the three checks per baseline type; a baseline is ready
to establish only when all three checks return no findings.
6. Across the program, evaluate all three baseline types together --
an early-program state should show findings only on the baselines
whose turn has not yet come, not spurious findings on a baseline
that is already legitimately established.
## Pitfalls
- Treating a passed milestone review as sufficient on its own --
clause 5.4.2.2 also requires the artifact record and the sequence
position; a baseline with a passed CDR but no as-built configuration
list is not yet an established product baseline.
- Allowing a later baseline to be established out of sequence because
its own milestone has passed (e.g. PDR passed but SRR was skipped) --
the allocated baseline cannot exist without the functional baseline
underneath it, independent of which reviews happened to occur.
- Confusing the milestone that gates a baseline with the milestone
that confirms it -- SRR/PDR/CDR gate the functional/allocated/
product baselines respectively; downstream reviews (e.g. QR, AR)
confirm readiness for later program stages and are out of scope for
this leaf's gate check.
- Reading an empty missing-artifacts list as "fully compliant" when the
sequence or milestone check already failed -- all three checks are
independent findings and must all be clear, not just the last one
evaluated.
## Behavior contract (gate 3)
The baseline-type validation, sequence, milestone-gate, and artifact
logic is exercised by the gate 3 contract test:
scripts/test_e10_config_baselines.py against
scripts/e10_config_baselines_logic.py (stdlib unittest, offline). Run:
python3 scripts/test_e10_config_baselines.py
## Compliance
- ECSS standards are freely downloadable (ESA); cite the source and
paraphrase per standards-map.yaml.
- compliance: STANDARDS-REF, gated: false.
Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!