Skills DirectorySkills Directory
SkillsLearnSecurityCategoriesDocsCommunityBlog
Sign InSubmit Skill
Skills Directory

Security-tested agent skills for Claude, coding agents, and AI workflows.

Directory

  • Browse Skills
  • All Skills A–Z
  • Claude Skills
  • Claude Code Skills
  • Agent Skills
  • Categories
  • Authors
  • Submit a Skill

Learn

  • Learn Hub
  • Install Claude Skills
  • Write SKILL.md
  • Skills vs MCP
  • Directories Compared

Security

  • Security
  • Methodology
  • Secure Claude Skills
  • Security Badges

Company

  • About
  • Community
  • Blog
  • API Docs
  • Advertise

2026 Skills Directory. All rights reserved.

ProTermsPrivacyRefunds
Back to skills

Deep Stall Analysis

ASecurity

Use when you must assess whether a T-tail or aft-fuselage-mounted-tail airplane can enter a deep stall, a self-sustaining high-angle-of-attack trim beyond the stall sometimes called alpha lock, and whether the elevator retains pitch-down authority to recover. Compute the viscous stall angle from the wing lift slope, model the loss of horizontal-tail effectiveness in the wing or fuselage wake with a tail blanking factor, add the separated-flow wing-body pitch-up that rises after the stall and ...

2 stars
0 votes
0 copies
0 views
Added 9/27/2026
ai-agentspythongotestinggit

Works with

claude code

Security Analysis

A100/100

Scanned 9/27/2026

Install to Claude Code

$npx -y skills add ashfordeOU/aero-agent-skills --skill deep-stall-analysis --agent claude-code

Installs into .claude/skills of the current project.

Are you the author of Deep Stall Analysis?

Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.

Security grade badge for Deep Stall Analysis
[![Security: A — Skills Directory](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/api/skills/ashfordeou-deep-stall-analysis/badge)](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/ashfordeou-deep-stall-analysis)

More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page.

Download with Pro
Files
SKILL.md
---
name: deep-stall-analysis
description: "Use when you must assess whether a T-tail or aft-fuselage-mounted-tail airplane can enter a deep stall, a self-sustaining high-angle-of-attack trim beyond the stall sometimes called alpha lock, and whether the elevator retains pitch-down authority to recover. Compute the viscous stall angle from the wing lift slope, model the loss of horizontal-tail effectiveness in the wing or fuselage wake with a tail blanking factor, add the separated-flow wing-body pitch-up that rises after the stall and fades at very high angle of attack, solve for the post-stall trim angle in the deep-stall band, and compare the elevator pitch-down moment with the pitch-up hump it must overcome. Produces the stall angle, blanking factor at the trim, lock depth, recovery margin, and the deep-stall and alpha-lock verdicts. Trigger: deep stall, T-tail blanking, alpha lock, post-stall trim, tail blanking factor, separated flow pitch-up, pitch-down recovery authority."
license: Apache-2.0
compliance: STANDARDS-REF
standards:
  - id: far-25
    reference-only: true
  - id: cs-25
    reference-only: true
gated: false
domain: flight-mechanics
pack: stability-control
compatibility: "agentskills.io SKILL.md; any SKILL.md host (Claude Code, Hermes, OpenClaw)"
metadata:
  domain: flight-mechanics
  subdomain: stability-control
  tags: [deep-stall-analysis, t-tail-blanking, alpha-lock, post-stall-trim, separated-flow-pitch-up, tail-blanking-factor, pitch-down-recovery-authority, wake-blanked-tail]
  version: 0.1.0
  author: Aero Agent Skills
---

# Deep Stall Analysis (flight-mechanics/stability-control/deep-stall-analysis)

Use when the task is to assess whether a T-tail or aft-fuselage-mounted
tail airplane can enter a deep stall, a self-sustaining high-angle-of-
attack trim beyond the stall sometimes called alpha lock, and whether
the elevator retains enough pitch-down authority to recover from it.
The model captures the loss of horizontal-tail effectiveness when the
tail enters the wing or fuselage wake at high angle of attack through a
tail blanking factor, adds a separated-flow wing-body pitch-up that
rises after the stall and fades at very high angle of attack, solves
for the post-stall trim point in the deep-stall band, and compares the
elevator pitch-down moment available at that trim with the pitch-up
moment hump the elevator must overcome to pitch back below the stall.
It pairs with flight-mechanics/stability-control/spin-recovery as the
departure and spinning neighbor and with
flight-mechanics/stability-control/longitudinal-stability as the tail
sizing and static stability neighbor. Deep stall here means the static
pitch trim at high alpha with a wake-blanked tail, not a spin entry;
developed spins and autorotation bands belong to spin-recovery, and
stall and post-stall flight test programs belong to
flight-test-operations stall-characteristics-testing and
high-angle-of-attack-testing. All wake and separation coefficients in
this model are documented typical engineering-model constants, not
standard values.

## Domain quick reference

- Stall angle: alpha_stall = (clmax / a_w) * R2D +
  VISC_STALL_SHIFT_DEG, with a viscous shift of 2.0 deg above the
  linear clmax/a slope.
- Tail blanking factor: 1.0 below the wake angle, linear ramp to
  eta_blank / eta_t0 across the next BLANK_DELTA_DEG = 10 deg, constant
  at eta_blank / eta_t0 above. The factor multiplies eta_t0, so the
  effective tail efficiency is eta = eta_t0 * factor. Setting
  eta_blank equal to eta_t0 gives factor 1.0 everywhere, a tail that is
  never blanked.
- Tail pitch contribution: Cm_t = -v_h * eta * a_t * (1 -
  d_eps_dalpha) * alpha (radians), from the tail volume coefficient
  v_h, tail lift slope a_t and downwash gradient d_eps_dalpha.
- Separated-flow pitch-up: rises linearly at slope sep_contrib over
  SEP_RISE_RAD = 0.6 rad beyond the stall, fades linearly back to zero
  over SEP_FADE_RAD = 0.4 rad, zero outside that band.
- Total moment: Cm = cm0_wb + cm_alpha_wb * alpha + Cm_sep + Cm_t.
  A positive Cm in the deep-stall band means the airplane pitches up
  into the post-stall region; a downward crossing of Cm through zero at
  high alpha is the stable deep-stall trim (alpha lock point).
- Recovery authority: max_down_moment = |cm_delta| * |delta_e_max|,
  compared with the maximum pitch-up moment hump between the stall and
  the locked trim. Positive recovery margin means full down elevator
  can pitch the nose back below the stall.
- FAR 25 and CS 25 frame the stall and controllability context; the
  relations above are standard engineering methodology, summary-only.

## Workflow

1. Gather the configuration: clmax, a_w, cm0_wb, cm_alpha_wb, v_h,
   a_t, eta_t0, eta_blank, alpha_wake_deg, d_eps_dalpha, sep_contrib,
   cm_delta and delta_e_max_deg into the inputs dict.
2. Compute the stall angle with stall_angle_deg(clmax, a_w) and the
   tail blanking factor across alpha with blanking_factor(alpha_deg,
   alpha_wake_deg, eta_blank / eta_t0).
3. Build the pitch moment curve with cm_total(alpha_deg, inputs) and
   check its sign at the stall with cm_at_stall(inputs). A negative
   Cm at the stall is the trimmed pre-stall state.
4. Solve for the post-stall trim with find_deep_stall_trim(inputs):
   it scans the band from stall + 5 deg up to hi_deg (default 60 deg)
   and returns the highest-angle Cm zero crossing, the stable
   high-alpha trim where the fading separated-flow pitch-up lets Cm
   fall back below zero. None means Cm never crosses in the band, so
   the tail keeps authority and no deep-stall trim exists.
5. Measure the lock with lock_depth_deg(alpha_lock_deg,
   alpha_stall_deg) and the blanking at the trim from
   blanking_factor at the lock angle.
6. Compute recovery_margin(inputs, alpha_lock_deg): the elevator
   pitch-down moment available over the pitch-up hump between the
   stall and the locked trim. Infinite when no lock exists.
7. Run analyze(inputs) for the verdict dict: deep_stall True when a
   post-stall trim sits at least 3 deg above the stall; alpha_lock
   True when the elevator cannot overcome the hump (negative
   recovery margin).
8. Confirm the deterministic checks with the contract test
   scripts/test_deep_stall_analysis.py.

## Worked example

T-tail transport-like airplane: clmax 1.5, a_w 5.7, cm0_wb 0.02,
cm_alpha_wb -0.6, v_h 0.9, a_t 4.2, eta_t0 0.9, eta_blank 0.25,
alpha_wake_deg 20.0, d_eps_dalpha 0.35, sep_contrib 3.0,
cm_delta -1.1, delta_e_max_deg -25.0.

- Stall angle: 1.5 / 5.7 * 57.29578 + 2.0 = 17.08 deg (module value
  17.077837).
- Blanking factor: 1.0 at 20 deg, 0.63889 at 25 deg, 0.27778 at 30 deg
  and above (eta 0.25, tail almost fully in the wake).
- At 45 deg (0.7854 rad): the tail is fully blanked so Cm_t =
  -0.9 * 0.25 * 4.2 * 0.65 * 0.7854 = -0.482; the separated-flow
  pitch-up, x = 0.4873 rad past the stall, adds 3.0 * 0.4873 = 1.462;
  wing-body Cm = 0.02 - 0.471 = -0.451. Total Cm = +0.528, positive,
  the pitch-up deep-stall band.
- find_deep_stall_trim returns 58.77 deg, in the [55, 60] deg band,
  deterministically (two calls agree to 1e-9). Lock depth 58.77 -
  17.08 = 41.69 deg.
- Recovery: max down moment = 1.1 * 25 * 0.0174533 = 0.480. The
  pitch-up hump peak between stall and lock is about 0.729, so the
  recovery margin is 0.480 - 0.729 = -0.249, negative. analyze
  verdict: "deep-stall alpha lock, elevator insufficient", with
  cm_at_stall -0.818 (pre-stall trim is stable) and blanking factor
  0.27778 at the lock.
- With the same airplane at eta_blank 0.9 (tail never blanked, blank
  ratio 1.0) the tail keeps authority, Cm stays negative at high
  alpha, find_deep_stall_trim returns None and the verdict is
  "no deep-stall trim" with recovery margin infinite.
- With cm_delta -1.6 and delta_e_max_deg -30.0 the down moment rises
  to 0.838, the margin turns positive (+0.109) and the verdict becomes
  "deep-stall trim, elevator recovers".

## Verification

- stall_angle_deg(1.5, 5.7) returns 17.077837 deg, within 1e-6 of the
  module contract value.
- blanking_factor(25.0, 20.0, 0.25 / 0.9) returns 0.638889 and
  blanking_factor(35.0, 20.0, 0.25 / 0.9) returns 0.277778.
- separation_pitch_up at 45 deg returns 1.4620 (rise branch);
  peak 1.8 at 0.6 rad past the stall; 0.9 at 0.8 rad; zero at and
  beyond 1.0 rad and below the stall.
- cm_total(45.0, inputs) returns +0.5283, positive in the deep-stall
  band; cm_at_stall(inputs) is -0.818, negative.
- find_deep_stall_trim returns 58.7701 deg deterministically; the
  eta_blank 0.9 sanity case returns None.
- analyze reports deep_stall True, alpha_lock True, lock depth 41.69
  deg and the alpha-lock verdict for the worked example.
- ValueError rejection: clmax <= 0, a_w <= 0, v_h <= 0, eta_t0 <= 0 or
  > 1, eta_blank < 0 or > eta_t0, alpha_wake_deg <= 0, d_eps_dalpha
  outside [0, 1], sep_contrib <= 0, cm_delta >= 0, delta_e_max_deg
  >= 0 and cm_alpha_wb >= 0 all raise ValueError.
- Run the contract test offline: python3
  scripts/test_deep_stall_analysis.py (35 tests, deterministic).

## Pitfalls

- Setting eta_blank above eta_t0: the blanking factor is eta_blank/eta_t0
  and eta_blank is validated in [0, eta_t0]; setting eta_blank equal to
  eta_t0 models a tail that is never blanked (factor 1.0), not 'more
  blanking'.
- Expecting a deep-stall trim from every T-tail: find_deep_stall_trim
  returns None when Cm never crosses zero in the post-stall band (tail keeps
  authority), and recovery_margin is infinite then - None is the 'no alpha
  lock' answer, not a failure.
- Reading a positive Cm in the deep-stall band as recovery: positive Cm at
  high alpha means the airplane pitches up into the post-stall region; the
  downward crossing through zero is the stable lock point, and alpha_lock
  True means the elevator cannot overcome the hump.
- Sign conventions on the elevator: cm_delta must be negative and
  delta_e_max_deg negative (down elevator); cm_alpha_wb must be negative;
  violations raise ValueError and a positive cm_delta would report recovery
  authority with the wrong sign.
- Quoting the wake and separation coefficients as standard values: the
  blanking ramp, separation rise (0.6 rad) and fade (0.4 rad) and slopes are
  documented typical engineering-model constants, not standard values.

## Related leaves

- flight-mechanics/stability-control/spin-recovery: the departure and
  spinning regime neighbor; developed spin modes and spin recovery
  control inputs are its claim, not this leaf.
- flight-mechanics/stability-control/longitudinal-stability: neutral
  point and static margin for the low-alpha stability context and the
  tail volume basis.
- flight-mechanics/stability-control/dynamic-stability: the short
  period and phugoid modes around the trimmed states.
- flight-test-operations/envelope/stall-characteristics-testing: the
  flight test program for stall characteristics, the testing boundary
  for this analysis.
- flight-test-operations/envelope/high-angle-of-attack-testing: the
  flight test program for the post-stall regime this model assesses.
- vehicle-design/sizing/tail-sizing: sizing the horizontal tail that
  sets v_h and the tail authority used here.

## Behavior contract (gate 3)

Run the deterministic contract test (stdlib unittest, offline):

    python3 scripts/test_deep_stall_analysis.py

The test covers the stall angle value and scaling, the blanking factor
ramp points, the separation pitch-up branches (rise, peak, fade,
zero), the positive Cm deep-stall band at 45 deg, the negative Cm at
the stall, the bisection root value in [55, 60] deg with
determinism, the no-root sanity case, lock depth, recovery margins
(negative, infinite, positive), the analyze verdict strings, the full
output dict, and ValueError rejection of every non-physical input in
the validation list.

## Compliance

- Standards referenced, not reproduced: FAR 25 and CS 25 frame the
  stall and controllability context (25.103 stall, 25.143
  controllability and 25.145 longitudinal control context,
  summary-only per standards-map.yaml). The wake blanking and
  separated-flow coefficients in this model are documented typical
  engineering-model constants, not values taken from the standards.
- compliance: STANDARDS-REF, gated: false.

Attribution

ashfordeOUashfordeOU
View sourceMore from ashfordeOU →
SSkills DirectorySkills Directory

Know which skills are safe — weekly.

Best new skills + every skill we flagged as malicious. From the team that scanned 103,619.

Join free

Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.

Comments (0)

No comments yet. Be the first to comment!

SSkills DirectorySkills Directory

Know which skills are safe — weekly.

Best new skills + every skill we flagged as malicious. From the team that scanned 103,619.

Join free

Related Skills

Caveman

Ultra-compressed communication mode that cuts output tokens while keeping technical accuracy. Levels: lite, full, ultra and the wenyan variants. Use for /caveman, "caveman mode", "talk like caveman", "be brief" or "less tokens".

1074701 votes

Hyperplan

Adversarial multi-agent planning skill. Self-orchestrates 5 hostile category members (unspecified-low, unspecified-high, deep, ultrabrain, artistry) via team-mode for ruthless cross-critique debate, distills only the defensible insights, then MANDATORILY hands the distilled insight bundle to the `plan` agent for executable plan formalization. Use when planning needs maximum rigor and surfacing of weak assumptions, blind spots, and over-engineering. Triggers: 'hyperplan', 'hpp', '/hyperplan', ...

694821 votes

Mcp Code Execution

Routes multi-tool workflows through MCP servers for large datasets and pipelines. Use when Bash tool overhead is limiting throughput on data-heavy tasks.

3351 votes

catchup

Recovers the conversation and failed tool calls of a previous Codex, Claude Code, Antigravity, Cline, Copilot CLI, Cursor, DeepSeek Harness, Kimi, OpenCode, Pi Agent, or ZCode session. Use when the user says "catch up", "what did the last session do", "get me up to speed", "I switched agents", asks to recover/summarize a previous session before continuing, or asks to diagnose or report a catchup failure. Do NOT use for the current conversation, git history, or any non-agent log.

691 votes

math-skill

A comprehensive mathematical reasoning skill for AI assistants — handles arithmetic to research-level problems with rigorous step-by-step reasoning, systematic verification, and transparent uncertainty handling

381 votes
View all in ai-agents →