Skills DirectorySkills Directory
SkillsLearnSecurityCategoriesDocsCommunityBlog
Sign InSubmit Skill
Skills Directory

Security-tested agent skills for Claude, coding agents, and AI workflows.

Directory

  • Browse Skills
  • All Skills A–Z
  • Claude Skills
  • Claude Code Skills
  • Agent Skills
  • Categories
  • Authors
  • Submit a Skill

Learn

  • Learn Hub
  • Install Claude Skills
  • Write SKILL.md
  • Skills vs MCP
  • Directories Compared

Security

  • Security
  • Methodology
  • Secure Claude Skills
  • Security Badges

Company

  • About
  • Community
  • Blog
  • API Docs
  • Advertise

2026 Skills Directory. All rights reserved.

ProTermsPrivacyRefunds
Back to skills

Boundary Layer Theory

ASecurity

Use when the task is boundary-layer thickness estimation, displacement or momentum thickness, skin-friction coefficient on a surface, Reynolds-number regime classification, or transition location on a smooth surface. Compute laminar and turbulent boundary-layer thicknesses for a smooth flat plate: estimate the 99-percent thickness, displacement thickness, and momentum thickness from the local Reynolds number with the Blasius and 1/7 power-law correlations, evaluate the local and average skin-...

2 stars
0 votes
0 copies
0 views
Added 9/27/2026
ai-agentspython

Works with

claude code

Security Analysis

A100/100

Scanned 9/27/2026

Install to Claude Code

$npx -y skills add ashfordeOU/aero-agent-skills --skill boundary-layer-theory --agent claude-code

Installs into .claude/skills of the current project.

Are you the author of Boundary Layer Theory?

Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.

Security grade badge for Boundary Layer Theory
[![Security: A — Skills Directory](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/api/skills/ashfordeou-boundary-layer-theory/badge)](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/ashfordeou-boundary-layer-theory)

More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page.

Download with Pro
Files
SKILL.md
---
name: boundary-layer-theory
description: "Use when the task is boundary-layer thickness estimation, displacement or momentum thickness, skin-friction coefficient on a surface, Reynolds-number regime classification, or transition location on a smooth surface. Compute laminar and turbulent boundary-layer thicknesses for a smooth flat plate: estimate the 99-percent thickness, displacement thickness, and momentum thickness from the local Reynolds number with the Blasius and 1/7 power-law correlations, evaluate the local and average skin-friction coefficients, and classify the flow into laminar or turbulent regimes by the transition Reynolds number. Trigger: boundary layer, displacement thickness, momentum thickness, skin friction, transition, Reynolds number, Blasius."
license: Apache-2.0
compliance: STANDARDS-REF
standards:
  - id: naca-tr-824
    reference-only: true
gated: false
domain: aerodynamics
pack: aerodynamics
compatibility: "agentskills.io SKILL.md; any SKILL.md host (Claude Code, Hermes, OpenClaw)"
metadata:
  domain: aerodynamics
  subdomain: boundary-layer
  tags: [boundary-layer, displacement-thickness, momentum-thickness, skin-friction, transition]
  version: 0.1.0
  author: Aero Agent Skills
---

# Boundary Layer Theory (aerodynamics/boundary-layer/boundary-layer-theory)

Use when the task is flat-plate boundary-layer estimation: thickness,
displacement and momentum thickness, skin friction, and the laminar to
turbulent transition.

## Domain quick reference

- The boundary layer is the thin viscous region next to a surface
  where the velocity rises from zero at the wall (no-slip) to the edge
  value U_e. The local Reynolds number Re_x = rho * U * x / mu =
  U * x / nu sets the flow regime at station x.
- Laminar flat plate (Blasius similarity solution, 1908): 99-percent
  thickness delta = 5.0 * x / sqrt(Re_x), displacement thickness
  delta* = 1.7208 * x / sqrt(Re_x), momentum thickness
  theta = 0.664 * x / sqrt(Re_x), shape factor H = delta* / theta =
  2.5916, local skin friction Cf = 0.664 / sqrt(Re_x), average Cf over
  one side = 1.328 / sqrt(Re_x).
- Turbulent flat plate (1/7 power law, Re_x up to about 1e7):
  delta = 0.37 * x / Re_x^(1/5), delta* = delta / 8,
  theta = 7 * delta / 72, H = 9 / 7 = 1.286,
  local Cf = 0.0592 / Re_x^(1/5), average Cf = 0.074 / Re_x^(1/5).
  Above about 1e7 prefer the fully turbulent log-law correlation
  Cf = 0.455 / (log10 Re_x)^2.58.
- Displacement thickness delta* = integral_0^inf (1 - u / U_e) dy is
  the mass deficit of the layer; the outer flow behaves as if the body
  were thickened by delta*. Momentum thickness theta =
  integral_0^inf (u / U_e) * (1 - u / U_e) dy is the momentum deficit.
- The von Karman momentum integral d(theta)/dx + (H + 2) *
  (theta / U_e) * dU_e/dx = Cf / 2 relates the thickness growth to the
  edge velocity gradient for pressure-gradient layers.
- Transition: the laminar layer destabilizes through Tollmien-
  Schlichting waves. On a smooth flat plate with low free-stream
  turbulence the transition Reynolds number is near Re_x = 5e5; values
  range from about 3e5 (rough surface, high turbulence) to 3e6 (very
  quiet flow). Favorable pressure gradients delay transition, adverse
  gradients advance it.
- Reynolds-number regimes (flat plate): laminar below the transition
  Reynolds number, turbulent above; a fully laminar boundary layer
  over a whole chord is rare at flight Reynolds numbers (typically 1e6
  to 1e8).

## Workflow

1. Establish the condition: speed U, density rho, dynamic viscosity mu,
   and the station x (or chord position).
2. Compute Re_x with reynolds_number; use kinematic_viscosity when
   only nu = mu / rho is available.
3. Pick the regime with classify_regime (default transition at
   Re_x = 5e5) and use the laminar or turbulent functions.
4. Estimate delta, delta*, theta with the Blasius or 1/7 power-law
   thickness functions; form the shape factor with shape_factor.
5. Evaluate local and average skin friction with the cf functions;
   switch to cf_turbulent_log_law above Re_x ~ 1e7.
6. State the transition assumption explicitly; recheck when the
   surface is rough or the free-stream turbulence is high.

## Pitfalls

- Using the Blasius laminar values beyond transition: the turbulent
  layer is several times thicker and draggier at the same Re_x.
- Quoting delta where delta* was meant: the displacement thickness is
  about one third of delta for laminar flow and one eighth for
  turbulent flow.
- Mixing the local Cf with the average (total-drag) Cf: the laminar
  pair differs by a factor of two (0.664 vs 1.328), the turbulent pair
  by about 25 percent (0.0592 vs 0.074).
- Using the freestream speed where the edge velocity U_e differs
  (wing suction side, curved bodies): the correlations then misstate
  the thicknesses.
- Treating the transition point as fixed: roughness, free-stream
  turbulence, and pressure gradient move it by orders of magnitude.
- Applying the 1/7 power law near the wall or at very high Re_x: the
  profile has an infinite wall gradient; use the log-law correlation
  for friction above Re_x ~ 1e7.
- Forgetting the two-sided factor when converting skin friction to
  total surface drag: delta and Cf are per side.
- Mixing the length scale: the delta correlations are keyed to the
  local Re_x at station x, not a global chord Reynolds number.

## Behavior contract (gate 3)

The boundary-layer logic is exercised by the gate 3 contract test:
scripts/test_boundary_layer_theory.py against
scripts/boundary_layer_theory_logic.py (stdlib unittest, offline).
Run:
python3 scripts/test_boundary_layer_theory.py

## Compliance

- The Blasius solution and the 1/7 power-law and log-law correlations
  are classical physics results (public-domain knowledge), paraphrased
  here. NACA Report 824 is cited as reference only for the
  aerodynamics validation context; no proprietary or copyrighted text
  is reproduced.
- compliance: STANDARDS-REF, gated: false.

Attribution

ashfordeOUashfordeOU
View sourceMore from ashfordeOU →
SSkills DirectorySkills Directory

Know which skills are safe — weekly.

Best new skills + every skill we flagged as malicious. From the team that scanned 103,619.

Join free

Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.

Comments (0)

No comments yet. Be the first to comment!

SSkills DirectorySkills Directory

Know which skills are safe — weekly.

Best new skills + every skill we flagged as malicious. From the team that scanned 103,619.

Join free

Related Skills

Caveman

Ultra-compressed communication mode that cuts output tokens while keeping technical accuracy. Levels: lite, full, ultra and the wenyan variants. Use for /caveman, "caveman mode", "talk like caveman", "be brief" or "less tokens".

1074701 votes

Hyperplan

Adversarial multi-agent planning skill. Self-orchestrates 5 hostile category members (unspecified-low, unspecified-high, deep, ultrabrain, artistry) via team-mode for ruthless cross-critique debate, distills only the defensible insights, then MANDATORILY hands the distilled insight bundle to the `plan` agent for executable plan formalization. Use when planning needs maximum rigor and surfacing of weak assumptions, blind spots, and over-engineering. Triggers: 'hyperplan', 'hpp', '/hyperplan', ...

694821 votes

Mcp Code Execution

Routes multi-tool workflows through MCP servers for large datasets and pipelines. Use when Bash tool overhead is limiting throughput on data-heavy tasks.

3351 votes

catchup

Recovers the conversation and failed tool calls of a previous Codex, Claude Code, Antigravity, Cline, Copilot CLI, Cursor, DeepSeek Harness, Kimi, OpenCode, Pi Agent, or ZCode session. Use when the user says "catch up", "what did the last session do", "get me up to speed", "I switched agents", asks to recover/summarize a previous session before continuing, or asks to diagnose or report a catchup failure. Do NOT use for the current conversation, git history, or any non-agent log.

691 votes

math-skill

A comprehensive mathematical reasoning skill for AI assistants — handles arithmetic to research-level problems with rigorous step-by-step reasoning, systematic verification, and transparent uncertainty handling

381 votes
View all in ai-agents →