Use when the task is bird strike impact analysis and certification of transport aeroplane structure per FAR 25.631 and CS-25: estimate the impact kinetic energy of a 4 pound or 8 pound bird at cruise velocity with impact_energy, convert the bird mass to kilograms with bird_mass_kg, compute the specific energy with specific_energy, and rate the strike against the component damage threshold with damage_severity_ratio, penetration_verdict, and residual_strength_fraction for the residual strength...
Scanned 9/27/2026
Install to Claude Code
npx -y skills add ashfordeOU/aero-agent-skills --skill bird-strike --agent claude-codeInstalls into .claude/skills of the current project.
Are you the author of Bird Strike?
Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/ashfordeou-bird-strike)More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page.
---
name: bird-strike
description: "Use when the task is bird strike impact analysis and certification of transport aeroplane structure per FAR 25.631 and CS-25: estimate the impact kinetic energy of a 4 pound or 8 pound bird at cruise velocity with impact_energy, convert the bird mass to kilograms with bird_mass_kg, compute the specific energy with specific_energy, and rate the strike against the component damage threshold with damage_severity_ratio, penetration_verdict, and residual_strength_fraction for the residual strength after impact. Covers leading edge, windshield, radome, and engine inlet damage modes, energy absorption, soft-body impact behavior, and test versus analysis compliance. Trigger: bird strike, birdstrike, bird-strike, soft body impact, soft-body-impact, impact energy, impact-energy, leading edge, leading-edge, 4 pound bird, 8 pound bird, FAR 25.631, windshield, radome, engine inlet."
license: Apache-2.0
compliance: STANDARDS-REF
standards:
- id: far-25
reference-only: true
- id: cs-25
reference-only: true
gated: false
domain: structures
pack: structures
compatibility: "agentskills.io SKILL.md; any SKILL.md host (Claude Code, Hermes, OpenClaw)"
metadata:
domain: structures
subdomain: damage-tolerance
tags: [bird-strike, birdstrike, soft-body-impact, impact-energy, leading-edge, energy-absorption, residual-strength, windshield-impact, radome-impact, engine-inlet]
version: 0.1.0
author: Aero Agent Skills
---
# Bird Strike (structures/damage-tolerance/bird-strike)
Use when the task is bird strike impact analysis for
damage-tolerant structure: impact kinetic energy, soft-body impact
damage severity, and residual strength after impact.
## Domain quick reference
- The impact kinetic energy E = 0.5 * m * v^2 is the governing
parameter for soft-body impact damage; m is the bird mass and v is
the velocity of the aeroplane relative to the bird along the flight
path.
- Bird mass classes: the 4 pound bird (about 1.81 kg) is the FAR
25.631 empennage impact case; the 8 pound bird (about 3.63 kg) is
the heavier class used for windshield, radome, and engine inlet
assessments. Convert with bird_mass_kg.
- Impact velocity: cruise speed of the aeroplane relative to the
bird, about 250 m/s for a transport at Mach 0.8 cruise. Anchors at
250 m/s: the 4 pound bird gives 56.6 kJ, the 8 pound bird gives
113.4 kJ (twice the energy, mass enters linearly), and the specific
energy is 31.25 kJ/kg.
- Soft-body impact behavior: the bird deforms on impact, so the
struck component sees an impact pulse rather than a rigid-body
collision; a softer, more compliant target stretches the pulse and
lowers the peak pressure, and the kinetic energy governs the damage
extent.
- Damage modes by component: leading edge skin and substructure
denting, tearing, and penetration; windshield glazing fracture and
crew protection; radome skin fracture and radar degradation; engine
inlet lip damage and fan blade ingestion risk.
- Energy absorption: stringers, frames, and crush zones absorb part
of the strike energy by deformation, so leading edge damage
resistance scales with skin gauge, stringer pitch, and absorbed
energy; the residual strength fraction after impact is rated by
comparing the strike energy with the component damage threshold.
- Certification compliance is normally test-based (a bird gun fires a
gel bird at representative components) with analysis used to show
equivalence for other masses, velocities, and impact positions.
The threshold comparison below is an analysis aid, not a test
substitute.
- Units (single convention, consistent across the logic module):
mass in kg, velocity in m/s, energy and threshold in joules.
Anchor: an 8 pound bird at 250 m/s against a 60 kJ leading edge
threshold gives severity ratio 1.89 (penetration) and residual
strength fraction about 0.05.
## Workflow
1. Identify the certification case: the component (leading edge,
windshield, radome, or engine inlet) and the bird class (4 or 8
pound).
2. Convert the bird mass with bird_mass_kg; take the impact velocity
as the aeroplane cruise speed relative to the bird.
3. Compute the impact kinetic energy with impact_energy and the
specific energy with specific_energy.
4. Compare the strike energy with the component damage threshold with
damage_severity_ratio and penetration_verdict.
5. Estimate the residual strength after impact with
residual_strength_fraction; feed the result into the continued
safe flight and landing assessment.
6. Position the result in the compliance argument: test evidence for
the critical case, analysis for the remaining conditions.
## Pitfalls
- Using the aeroplane ground speed instead of the velocity relative
to the bird along the flight path.
- Mixing units: a mass in pounds with a velocity in m/s shifts the
energy by the kg per pound factor; keep kg and m/s.
- Dropping the 0.5 factor in 0.5 * m * v^2.
- Sizing the component to the 4 pound bird when the strike case is
the 8 pound windshield, radome, or engine inlet case.
- Using momentum instead of kinetic energy: energy scales with v^2
and governs penetration damage, momentum does not.
- Treating the threshold comparison as certification evidence: the
severity and residual strength models are analysis aids, the
compliance basis is test plus similarity.
- Routing event probability questions here: bird strike probability
per flight and hazard classification belong to
particular-risk-analysis (ARP4761A).
- Routing fatigue crack questions here: crack growth and Paris law
belong to crack-growth, residual strength after a crack belongs to
residual-strength, and rainflow counting of the load spectrum
belongs to load-spectrum-counting.
## Behavior contract (gate 3)
The impact energy, severity, and residual strength logic is exercised
by the gate 3 contract test: scripts/test_bird_strike.py against
scripts/bird_strike_logic.py (stdlib unittest, offline). Run:
python3 scripts/test_bird_strike.py
## Compliance
- Standards referenced, not reproduced: FAR-25 is US government work
(public domain) and CS-25 is a free EASA download; bird strike
methodology is common soft-body impact knowledge, summary-only per
standards-map.yaml.
- compliance: STANDARDS-REF, gated: false.
Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!