Skills DirectorySkills Directory
SkillsLearnSecurityCategoriesDocsCommunityBlog
Sign InSubmit Skill
Skills Directory

Security-tested agent skills for Claude, coding agents, and AI workflows.

Directory

  • Browse Skills
  • All Skills A–Z
  • Claude Skills
  • Claude Code Skills
  • Agent Skills
  • Categories
  • Authors
  • Submit a Skill

Learn

  • Learn Hub
  • Install Claude Skills
  • Write SKILL.md
  • Skills vs MCP
  • Directories Compared

Security

  • Security
  • Methodology
  • Secure Claude Skills
  • Security Badges

Company

  • About
  • Community
  • Blog
  • API Docs
  • Advertise

2026 Skills Directory. All rights reserved.

ProTermsPrivacyRefunds
Back to skills

Alignment Geometry Checks

ASecurity

Use when verifying that structural components meet alignment accuracy, dimensional stability, and geometrical form requirements per ECSS-E-ST-32C clauses 4.6.3.19–4.6.3.21. Check each component's measured alignment (angular and translational) against its specified tolerance; assess dimensional change from baseline against the stability budget across thermal, hygroscopic, creep, and other drivers; verify geometrical form deviations (flatness, straightness, circularity, parallelism, perpendicul...

2 stars
0 votes
0 copies
0 views
Added 9/27/2026
ai-agentspythongoangular

Works with

claude code

Security Analysis

A100/100

Scanned 9/27/2026

Install to Claude Code

$npx -y skills add ashfordeOU/aero-agent-skills --skill alignment-geometry-checks --agent claude-code

Installs into .claude/skills of the current project.

Are you the author of Alignment Geometry Checks?

Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.

Security grade badge for Alignment Geometry Checks
[![Security: A — Skills Directory](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/api/skills/ashfordeou-alignment-geometry-checks/badge)](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/ashfordeou-alignment-geometry-checks)

More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page.

Download with Pro
Files
SKILL.md
---
name: alignment-geometry-checks
description: "Use when verifying that structural components meet alignment accuracy, dimensional stability, and geometrical form requirements per ECSS-E-ST-32C clauses 4.6.3.19–4.6.3.21. Check each component's measured alignment (angular and translational) against its specified tolerance; assess dimensional change from baseline against the stability budget across thermal, hygroscopic, creep, and other drivers; verify geometrical form deviations (flatness, straightness, circularity, parallelism, perpendicularity, angularity, runout) against interface control drawing allowables; and aggregate findings to determine overall compliance. Trigger: ecss, e-st-32-structures-scope, alignment-checks, dimensional-stability, geometrical-control, tolerance-verification, structural-geometry, interface-control."
license: Apache-2.0
compliance: STANDARDS-REF
standards:
  - id: ecss
    reference-only: true
gated: false
domain: space-systems
pack: space-systems
compatibility: "agentskills.io SKILL.md; any SKILL.md host (Claude Code, Hermes, OpenClaw)"
metadata:
  domain: space-systems
  subdomain: ecss
  tags: [ecss, e-st-32-structures-scope, alignment-checks, dimensional-stability, geometrical-control, tolerance-verification, structural-geometry, interface-control]
  version: 0.1.0
  author: Aero Agent Skills
---

# ECSS Structural Verification — Alignment and Geometry Checks (space-systems/ecss/alignment-geometry-checks)

Use when the task is to verify alignment accuracy, dimensional stability, and
geometrical form control of structural components under ECSS-E-ST-32C clauses
4.6.3.19–4.6.3.21. The checks cover three distinct but related disciplines:
angular and translational alignment of components against their specified
tolerances, dimensional change from a baseline measurement against a
stability budget, and form deviations (flatness, straightness, circularity,
and similar) against interface-control-drawing allowables. A component is
only fully compliant when all three checks pass.

## Domain quick reference

- Clause 4.6.3.19 governs alignment checks: every component with a pointing
  or positional requirement must have a measured alignment value (angular
  in arcseconds or translational in millimetres) compared against the
  signed tolerance band specified in the interface control document (ICD).
  The check is per axis (tip, tilt, roll, and three translational axes) and
  a deviation that exceeds the half-band on any single axis constitutes a
  non-conformance requiring disposition.
- Clause 4.6.3.20 governs dimensional stability: a component's baseline
  dimension is measured before the environmental cycle, and the post-cycle
  dimension is compared against the allowable change (the stability budget).
  The four recognised stability drivers are thermal (CTE-driven expansion or
  contraction), hygroscopic (moisture absorption or desorption in composites),
  creep (time-dependent plastic flow under sustained load), and other
  (catch-all for documented but non-standard drivers). Each driver is
  tracked separately to support root-cause disposition.
- Clause 4.6.3.21 governs geometrical control: the form of surfaces and
  features is compared against allowables stated in the ICD. Recognised form
  types are flatness, straightness, circularity, cylindricity, parallelism,
  perpendicularity, angularity, and runout. Deviations are always non-negative
  (magnitude of form error); an allowable of zero or below is an input error,
  not a compliant state.

## Workflow

1. Collect all alignment measurements for each component: component ID,
   axis, measured value, allowable tolerance (symmetric half-band), and unit.
   Reject any entry with a non-positive tolerance before it enters the
   comparison — a zero or negative tolerance is an input error that must be
   resolved against the ICD before proceeding.
2. For each alignment entry, compute the margin as (allowable − |measured|).
   A non-negative margin is a pass; a negative margin is a fail. Record the
   magnitude of exceedance for every fail so that the non-conformance report
   has a quantified delta.
3. Collect dimensional stability measurements: component ID, baseline
   dimension, post-environment dimension, stability budget, and driver.
   Validate that the driver is one of the four recognised types before
   computing the dimensional change. A non-positive stability budget is an
   input error.
4. For each stability entry, compute the absolute dimensional change from
   baseline and compare against the budget. Flag exceedances with the
   signed delta and the driver so the disposition team can target the correct
   physical mechanism.
5. Collect geometry control measurements: component ID, geometry type,
   measured deviation (non-negative), and allowable deviation. Reject any
   geometry type that is not in the set of eight recognised types — an
   unknown type indicates a missing ICD entry, not a new compliant state.
6. For each geometry entry, compute the margin as (allowable − measured).
   Non-negative margin is a pass; negative margin is a fail.
7. Aggregate all alignment, stability, and geometry results into a single
   compliance summary. The component assembly is compliant only when the
   total failure count is zero across all three check types.

## Pitfalls

- Applying the alignment tolerance as a full-band rather than a half-band
  (symmetric ±): the ICD tolerance is the half-band, so a measured value of
  +8 arcsec against a ±10 arcsec tolerance has 2 arcsec margin, not 18.
  Using the full band doubles the apparent margin and masks real exceedances.
- Omitting the driver field for dimensional stability and reporting a single
  aggregate change: thermal and hygroscopic mechanisms require different
  corrective actions, and lumping them prevents root-cause disposition.
- Treating a missing stability budget as a pass: an unrecorded budget means
  the stability requirement was never captured in the ICD, which is itself a
  finding, not a compliant condition.
- Accepting a negative measured deviation for a geometry check as meaning
  "within tolerance in the other direction": form deviations are magnitudes
  (non-negative by definition); a negative input is a data error that must
  be resolved before the check is run.
- Allowing an unrecognised geometry type to pass through as a default pass:
  a type not in the ICD-recognised set indicates an incomplete interface
  definition, not a compliant surface.

## Behavior contract (gate 3)

The alignment comparison, dimensional stability, and geometry control logic is
exercised by the gate 3 contract test:
scripts/test_alignment_geometry_checks.py against
scripts/alignment_geometry_checks_logic.py (stdlib unittest, offline). Run:
python3 scripts/test_alignment_geometry_checks.py

## Compliance

- ECSS standards are freely downloadable (ESA); cite the source and
  paraphrase per standards-map.yaml.
- compliance: STANDARDS-REF, gated: false.

Attribution

ashfordeOUashfordeOU
View sourceMore from ashfordeOU →
SSkills DirectorySkills Directory

Know which skills are safe — weekly.

Best new skills + every skill we flagged as malicious. From the team that scanned 103,619.

Join free

Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.

Comments (0)

No comments yet. Be the first to comment!

SSkills DirectorySkills Directory

Know which skills are safe — weekly.

Best new skills + every skill we flagged as malicious. From the team that scanned 103,619.

Join free

Related Skills

Caveman

Ultra-compressed communication mode that cuts output tokens while keeping technical accuracy. Levels: lite, full, ultra and the wenyan variants. Use for /caveman, "caveman mode", "talk like caveman", "be brief" or "less tokens".

1074701 votes

Hyperplan

Adversarial multi-agent planning skill. Self-orchestrates 5 hostile category members (unspecified-low, unspecified-high, deep, ultrabrain, artistry) via team-mode for ruthless cross-critique debate, distills only the defensible insights, then MANDATORILY hands the distilled insight bundle to the `plan` agent for executable plan formalization. Use when planning needs maximum rigor and surfacing of weak assumptions, blind spots, and over-engineering. Triggers: 'hyperplan', 'hpp', '/hyperplan', ...

694821 votes

Mcp Code Execution

Routes multi-tool workflows through MCP servers for large datasets and pipelines. Use when Bash tool overhead is limiting throughput on data-heavy tasks.

3351 votes

catchup

Recovers the conversation and failed tool calls of a previous Codex, Claude Code, Antigravity, Cline, Copilot CLI, Cursor, DeepSeek Harness, Kimi, OpenCode, Pi Agent, or ZCode session. Use when the user says "catch up", "what did the last session do", "get me up to speed", "I switched agents", asks to recover/summarize a previous session before continuing, or asks to diagnose or report a catchup failure. Do NOT use for the current conversation, git history, or any non-agent log.

691 votes

math-skill

A comprehensive mathematical reasoning skill for AI assistants — handles arithmetic to research-level problems with rigorous step-by-step reasoning, systematic verification, and transparent uncertainty handling

381 votes
View all in ai-agents →